Transfer rumours !

bwfc1874 wrote:Nixon's saying permanent move but I'd probably favour a loan to be fair. Again it's what Palace want though!

Stop trying to make out that you know what's going on, and that you're Mr intelligent , stick to being a nerd, you're good at that.

i'd do this or i'd do that, if you would do it, then my advice would be do the opposite.

You having a bad day, Scott?

You seem a bit grumpy....

As mentioned, I hope there's a back up plan but if we get Murray he could do a job for us. He can score but at Palace he had great wingers helping him out and he needs the whole team to play higher up the pitch than we have been doing (apparently that's what Dougie is trying to get the lads to do) With him and Beckford we'd have options whether we were on the front foot or the back foot.
If only Murray had Beckford's pace - or Beckford had Murray's finishing ability....

There's a lot of bickering on here at the moment!

I just can't be arsed with nerds like that '' up his own arse'' Mr Limp .



Give me AD anyday, he's entertaining, Mr limp make me fall asleep.

Don't be bitter Scott. Just stop trying to be Nat and find your own personality, may be more interesting for you too!

Anyway back on topic, I think Beckford and Murray are reasonably similar in terms of they both need pacy wingers to supply them - as mentioned by bread and lust. I'd hope then that Freedman going for Murray indicates he wants to play hall and Feeney either side of a striker, that would certainly give us some good attacking threat and pace.

wanderlust wrote:As mentioned, I hope there's a back up plan but if we get Murray he could do a job for us. He can score but at Palace he had great wingers helping him out and he needs the whole team to play higher up the pitch than we have been doing (apparently that's what Dougie is trying to get the lads to do) With him and Beckford we'd have options whether we were on the front foot or the back foot.
If only Murray had Beckford's pace - or Beckford had Murray's finishing ability....

I'm hoping Feeney will be the man to get the ball in the box just as he did in his loan spell

bwfc1874 wrote:Don't be bitter Scott. Just stop trying to be Nat and find your own personality, may be more interesting for you too!

I think that you're obsessed with Nat, you keep on going on about her.

She wouldn't go with a drip like you though, sorry to disappoint .

I'd get excited again about Wanderers if we could get Murray and Mason. However, I thought Dougie refused to play with wingers crossing balls into the box? If so, how are we going to set up and play? This is what gets my really pissed off with all of this. We could have a dream team of Murray and Mason (Christ how far have we fallen for me to write that in a sentence!) but if they are still getting crap instructions from the side-line what hope do we have?

I'll give Dougie the credit if he can get these two into our side this year, but I will be expecting even more from them than I would do if we just have Beckford and Cravies.

Hope I'm proved wrong but I get the feeling Mason as well as Murray might be a stretch for us!

bwfc1874 wrote:Hope I'm proved wrong but I get the feeling Mason as well as Murray might be a stretch for us!

I'd be amazed if that happened - although Cardiff only paid Argyle £250k for Mason.

Breadman wrote:You having a bad day, Scott?

You seem a bit grumpy....

I can set Scott off with half a sentence, it's a hidden talent of mine. It's good fun once in a while, he really does hold a grudge though.

Breadman wrote:


If you take the shit load of penalties out, he scored the majority of his goals from around the edge of the six-yard box from crosses fired in from the by-line.

Can't do that!!!! it's old fashioned!!!! remember!!!!

Complete invention there Bryan.

bwfc1874 wrote:Complete invention there Bryan.

Dougie said it, you know he did!!!!!

wanderlust wrote:

bwfc1874 wrote:Hope I'm proved wrong but I get the feeling Mason as well as Murray might be a stretch for us!

I'd be amazed if that happened - although Cardiff only paid Argyle £250k for Mason.

Also its a problem that all the other teams know how desperate we are for a striker. A bit like when a team sells a player for 10's of millions, any player they look at after will see their value increase by 10% at least because everyone knows they have cash to spend.

Well, everyone knows now that its getting time critical and we only have 2 strikers for the season and we are desperate!

wanderlust wrote:

bwfc1874 wrote:Hope I'm proved wrong but I get the feeling Mason as well as Murray might be a stretch for us!

I'd be amazed if that happened - although Cardiff only paid Argyle £250k for Mason.

Also its a problem that all the other teams know how desperate we are for a striker, so any player we look at will see that players value rise especially now that its getting time critical.

bryan458 wrote:

bwfc1874 wrote:Complete invention there Bryan.

Dougie said it, you know he did!!!!!

No I don't. He said 442 with a big man up front to go long to is old fashioned. Nothing to do with wingers.

bwfc1874 wrote:

bryan458 wrote:

bwfc1874 wrote:Complete invention there Bryan.

Dougie said it, you know he did!!!!!

No I don't. He said 442 with a big man up front to go long to is old fashioned. Nothing to do with wingers.

No he really did. He said playing 4-4-2 with wingers crossing endless balls into the box was out-dated. I'll have a look for the BEN article that he was quoted in.... actually I cant be arsed. You have a look for the article.

I remember the BEN article and I know he said what I've written above. If either of you want to dig it out to try and prove me wrong feel free.