Bolton Wanderers Football Club Fan Forum for all BWFC Supporters.


You are not connected. Please login or register

Why did Wanderers not get the best out of Keith Andrews

+3
wanderlust
Norpig
BoltonTillIDie
7 posters

Go down  Message [Page 1 of 1]

BoltonTillIDie

BoltonTillIDie
Nat Lofthouse
Nat Lofthouse

PRECIOUS few people in football have a bad word to say about Keith Andrews, so why did his spell at Wanderers simply fail to ignite?

There haven’t been many tears shed on the terraces as the experienced midfielder prepares to start afresh at Watford, the 12th club of a 15-year professional career.

In the eyes of most fans, the 34-year-old former Ireland international was a costly error, brought in on a high wage and a three-year contract at a time the club needed to tighten their belt.

Andrews had been the man Owen Coyle signed to add some steel to his midfield. On paper he looked like an ideal candidate to replace Nigel Reo-Coker, and boasted a recent record that suggested he would also add goals.

Coyle had tried to bring him in on loan the previous January only for the deal to collapse.

One wonders how things might have worked out differently if he had signed for Bolton then rather than after relegation?

When the Scot finally landed his man, Wanderers struggled outside the top flight, and Andrews suffered as much as anyone.

By the time Coyle was sacked with the club 18th in the table, the midfielder had become spokesperson for a disaffected dressing room. He spoke up in some difficult times; including the aftermath of a 3-1 defeat at Hull City that many believe was the turning point in Coyle’s reign.

“The fans are entitled to their opinion and if I was one of them I wouldn’t be overly enamoured with what I was watching,” he reflected, honestly.

When Dougie Freedman stepped into the role in October 2012 things picked up briefly for Andrews, who assumed penalty-taking duties that accounted for all four of his goals that season.

There were already signs his deep-lying midfield role was not playing to his strengths, but a serious thigh injury at Crystal Palace in January effectively spelled the end of his time with the Whites.

The addition of Medo Kamara later that month provided a sign Freedman wanted something different.

The Scot was determined to usher in a more dynamic style, and Andrews simply did not fit.

Regardless, he started the following season as Whites fans waited for Jay Spearing’s move from Liverpool.

A league appearance at Burnley was followed by another drab day at Crawley as Wanderers crashed out of the Captial One Cup in what proved the Irishman’s last appearance.

As Spearing’s move came through, Andrews was packed off to Brighton where he enjoyed a successful eight months, helping the Seagulls to the play-off semi-finals.

“Keith is at a stage where he needs to play every week,” said the Whites boss. “He has been a fantastic professional for the club but I explained to him I have got young Josh Vela coming through and I need to get him as much time as I can in these games.

“He’s been good about it, he’s accepted it, and had a couple of offers on the table. It’s a natural progression and he knows that.”

Wanderers had moved on in Andrews’ absence. Freedman wanted pace in his midfield and was looking towards Spearing, Medo, Vela and Liam Trotter.

Sheffield Wednesday and Huddersfield looked favourites to take Andrews on loan until Watford emerged as a late suitor – proof Andrews’ stock is still high despite his disappointment at Bolton. He departs with little fanfare and a sense of being the right man signed at the wrong time.

Source

Norpig

Norpig
Nat Lofthouse
Nat Lofthouse

i always saw Andrews as a goal scoring midfielder and was really pleased when we signed him, but he was more often than not played as a defensive midfielder which as it says in the article didn't really suit him.

We need to get him off the wage bill now and free up some more funds to get that elusive striker.

wanderlust

wanderlust
Nat Lofthouse
Nat Lofthouse

Norpig wrote:i always saw Andrews as a goal scoring midfielder and was really pleased when we signed him, but he was more often than not played as a defensive midfielder which as it says in the article didn't really suit him.
Me too. I thought he was a bit slow as well.

I do think it's ironic that the article says "Freedman wanted pace in his midfield and was looking towards Spearing, Medo, Vela and Liam Trotter."


Those four aren't exactly contenders for the 4 x 100m sprint relay team.

Natasha Whittam

Natasha Whittam
Nat Lofthouse
Nat Lofthouse

Amazing how many managers continue to buy players and then play them in completely different roles to which they are used to.

It's also amazing how many times Bolton managers have commented on Josh Vela being the future of BWFC when we all know he's injury prone and shit. Has he played more than 5 games for Bolton?

doffcocker

doffcocker
Ivan Campo
Ivan Campo

Everybody thinks Andrews is a goalscoring midfielder until they realise most of his goals come from penalties. 
All he was good for was sitting in central midfield, picking out short backwards and sideways passes. I'm surprised Dougie isn't a huge fan.  

I don't know where this "precious few people in football have a bad word to say about him" nonsense comes from. Blackburn fans didn't like him, that's for sure.

Norpig

Norpig
Nat Lofthouse
Nat Lofthouse

Dougies trying to schmooze him out of the Macron otherwise we may be stuck with him and his big wages for a while yet.

luckyPeterpiper

luckyPeterpiper
Ivan Campo
Ivan Campo

two words: Dougie Freedman.

Guest


Guest

luckyPeterpiper wrote:two words: Dougie Freedman.

If you think keeping Andrews on the wage bill at £20,000 a week would be the right course of action then I've lost all faith in you.

wanderlust

wanderlust
Nat Lofthouse
Nat Lofthouse

luckyPeterpiper wrote:two words: Dougie Freedman.
Codswallop. Andrews had his chance and blew it. Then held us to ransom. Asshole.

Vendor

Vendor
Mario Jardel
Mario Jardel

doffcocker wrote:
I don't know where this "precious few people in football have a bad word to say about him" nonsense comes from. Blackburn fans didn't like him, that's for sure.
My work mate supports Wovers, he couldn't stick Andrews when he played for them. Why we allowed Coyle to sign him on a £20000 per week contract is utter madness. Well done Dougie for getting rid of another overpaid tosser.

wanderlust

wanderlust
Nat Lofthouse
Nat Lofthouse

Apparently we had to negotiate re paying off the final year of his contract so I suspect we may still be subsidising his wages.

Sponsored content



Back to top  Message [Page 1 of 1]

Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum