Bolton Wanderers Football Club Fan Forum for all BWFC Supporters.


You are not connected. Please login or register

Time to go, but who's next ?

+19
Soul Kitchen
observer
boltonbonce
rammywhite
terenceanne
White84
Copper Dragon
Sluffy
luckyPeterpiper
bryan458
Reebok_Rebel
Hipster_Nebula
wanderlust
Boggersbelief
Natasha Whittam
JAH
karlypants
Norpig
MartinBWFC
23 posters

Go to page : Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6  Next

Reply to topic

Which one would you have

Time to go, but who's next ? - Page 5 Vote_lcap0%Time to go, but who's next ? - Page 5 Vote_rcap 0% [ 0 ]
Time to go, but who's next ? - Page 5 Vote_lcap14%Time to go, but who's next ? - Page 5 Vote_rcap 14% [ 2 ]
Time to go, but who's next ? - Page 5 Vote_lcap29%Time to go, but who's next ? - Page 5 Vote_rcap 29% [ 4 ]
Time to go, but who's next ? - Page 5 Vote_lcap14%Time to go, but who's next ? - Page 5 Vote_rcap 14% [ 2 ]
Time to go, but who's next ? - Page 5 Vote_lcap29%Time to go, but who's next ? - Page 5 Vote_rcap 29% [ 4 ]
Time to go, but who's next ? - Page 5 Vote_lcap14%Time to go, but who's next ? - Page 5 Vote_rcap 14% [ 2 ]
Total Votes : 14


Go down  Message [Page 5 of 6]

81Time to go, but who's next ? - Page 5 Empty Re: Time to go, but who's next ? Thu Aug 21, 2014 1:30 pm

Guest


Guest

Boggersbelief wrote:
Breadman wrote:Boggers......?

Yes?

If you don't stop leaking stuff to the press, you're going to wind up very cold and eating your frost-bitten fingers to survive.

Fair warning.

82Time to go, but who's next ? - Page 5 Empty Re: Time to go, but who's next ? Thu Aug 21, 2014 1:32 pm

Copper Dragon

Copper Dragon
Ivan Campo
Ivan Campo

I'm not going to go into it because it's tedious for me and boring for others, but you certainly had the blinkers on that evening.

At least we know what the crack is now.

All done and dusted.

83Time to go, but who's next ? - Page 5 Empty Re: Time to go, but who's next ? Thu Aug 21, 2014 1:38 pm

wanderlust

wanderlust
Nat Lofthouse
Nat Lofthouse

Breadman wrote:
Boggersbelief wrote:
Breadman wrote:Boggers......?

Yes?

If you don't stop leaking stuff to the press, you're going to wind up very cold and eating your frost-bitten fingers to survive.

Fair warning.
Just a little test of this theory. If Ibe signs for Derby it's hello Magadan.

84Time to go, but who's next ? - Page 5 Empty Re: Time to go, but who's next ? Thu Aug 21, 2014 1:40 pm

Guest


Guest

No doubt all this is going right over Boggers' head.

It strikes me that he's not big on reading actual books......

85Time to go, but who's next ? - Page 5 Empty Re: Time to go, but who's next ? Thu Aug 21, 2014 1:55 pm

Boggersbelief

Boggersbelief
Nat Lofthouse
Nat Lofthouse

Breadman wrote:No doubt all this is going right over Boggers' head.

It strikes me that he's not big on reading actual books......
Very rude aren't you.

I'll save the reading until I'm old and decrepit.

86Time to go, but who's next ? - Page 5 Empty Re: Time to go, but who's next ? Thu Aug 21, 2014 3:41 pm

observer


Andy Walker
Andy Walker

JAH wrote:
wanderlust wrote:
Breadman wrote:If the debt's not the problem, Sluff (and I'm not contradicting you in saying that), why didn't we snap up Jutkiewicz when we had the chance?

And why are we closing in on the end of the transfer window with precious little to show for our "efforts" to bring in new players?

Freedman went on record as saying that all his transfer business would be concluded "in the first couple of weeks of the window" and the way things are looking, he was right.

We're scratching round for loan deals that all appear to be getting hijacked as soon as our interest becomes public knowledge and it's not looking good.

All the signs are that we have absolutely no money to bring in (desperately needed) new players and if it's not the debt, what is it?

 scratch
I'd imagine it's because of FFP and public scrutiny. As I understand it, FFP means that clubs can only spend on transfers the amount they have made in trading profit.

With BWFC having invested in land and infrastructure etc there is no profit "on paper" and therefore the money available to spend on transfers is zero under FFP regulations.
However in future years it may be possible to declare a paper profit providing the ROI on the land/infrastructure outstrips the loan repayments which at 0% interest would be £16.3 million p.a. if it was a straight line repayment agreement.
Also depends on how much further investment is required to develop the assets.

The conundrum is this:

If a club doesn't invest in a diverse range of income streams (property development, retail, hotels, facilities etc) the profit it makes will be entirely dependent on football-related trading activities and therefore it will have to spend heavily on the team to generate that profit. All good but it means all their eggs are in one basket AND they have to be successful as a team every year despite only spending the profit they make on players .
If a club diversifies it's investments it is hamstrung in the early years as any profit goes into investments rather than on the pitch, but in the long term the risk is spread and there is a much more secure base to the business meaning more to spend on players in the future.

We have chosen short term pain for long term gain it would seem.


Which is even more baffling that the club don't appear to be too bothered about attendances dropping. You would think that them upstairs would want the football side to be as profitable as possible.

I've heard this mentioned a number of times in passing, but there seems to be breakdown between the football side of the business and the business itself. The supporters are paramount to the survival of the football club, but the business men seem to have lost touch with that. No supporters = no football club.

When big Nat was here he was the conduit between the business and the football club, but since his passing that appears to be broken. On the face of it is obvious what needs to happen.

The football side of the business needs to be refocused and more effort has to be done to make it run to capacity (i.e. maximising turnover from developed players, turnover from the stadium, merchandise turnover etc).

On the subject of capacity We have a 25k person stadium that we are barely half filling. Get bums on seats whatever it takes. I'm not going to go into change of managerial personnel etc again, but that should also be a consideration, even to the point of style of football should be a considered. Drop ticket prices (refund some of the season ticket holders the difference if that keeps us regular supporters happy) as long as we start filling the stadium. More bums on seats = more paying for drinks and pies and more money spent in the store. When we have the capacity of the stadium up the football side of the business will also be working at an increased capacity and we'll have a greater turnover.

I can't for the life of me think of a reason why this is not being done.
Can't be bothered with more bums on seats but rather the bums on the pitch!

87Time to go, but who's next ? - Page 5 Empty Re: Time to go, but who's next ? Thu Aug 21, 2014 9:34 pm

Soul Kitchen

Soul Kitchen
Ivan Campo
Ivan Campo

MartinBWFC wrote:
bwfc1874 wrote:Ye bet Hierro can't wait to leave Real Madrid and come to Bolton!
Lighten up, ffs, confrontational doesn't suit you.
 :agree:

88Time to go, but who's next ? - Page 5 Empty Re: Time to go, but who's next ? Fri Aug 22, 2014 7:01 pm

scottjames30

scottjames30
Nat Lofthouse
Nat Lofthouse

I'd have John McGinlay as the boss and SKD AS N02, Campo as a coaching role with Stelios.

What could possibly go wrong.

89Time to go, but who's next ? - Page 5 Empty Re: Time to go, but who's next ? Fri Aug 22, 2014 7:37 pm

Natasha Whittam

Natasha Whittam
Nat Lofthouse
Nat Lofthouse

Stig Tofting as boss, Gerry Taggart his assistant. 100% more effort overnight.

90Time to go, but who's next ? - Page 5 Empty Re: Time to go, but who's next ? Fri Aug 22, 2014 8:04 pm

scottjames30

scottjames30
Nat Lofthouse
Nat Lofthouse

Why can't Gartside see this, he can't be a proper fan after all.

91Time to go, but who's next ? - Page 5 Empty Re: Time to go, but who's next ? Mon Aug 25, 2014 5:10 am

Rancid Robert

Rancid Robert
Mario Jardel
Mario Jardel

Malky.

92Time to go, but who's next ? - Page 5 Empty Re: Time to go, but who's next ? Mon Aug 25, 2014 7:32 am

rammywhite

rammywhite
Frank Worthington
Frank Worthington

Rancid Robert wrote:Malky.

No way- he's damaged goods now. That would be the same as having the payday loan company as sponsor. Dropping them was one of the things that Gartside got right

93Time to go, but who's next ? - Page 5 Empty Re: Time to go, but who's next ? Mon Aug 25, 2014 9:28 am

wanderlust

wanderlust
Nat Lofthouse
Nat Lofthouse

rammywhite wrote:
Rancid Robert wrote:Malky.

No way- he's damaged goods now. That would be the same as having the payday loan company as sponsor. Dropping them was one of the things that Gartside got right
He is possibly the only manager with any sort of experience who would even consider coming to our club if offered the  job.
And what is there to lose? We are already a laughing stock.

94Time to go, but who's next ? - Page 5 Empty Re: Time to go, but who's next ? Mon Aug 25, 2014 9:31 am

Hipster_Nebula

Hipster_Nebula
Nat Lofthouse
Nat Lofthouse

Even I would rather have Jimmy Phillips, I'd have JP way way way way way down my list.

95Time to go, but who's next ? - Page 5 Empty Re: Time to go, but who's next ? Mon Aug 25, 2014 9:48 am

rammywhite

rammywhite
Frank Worthington
Frank Worthington

wanderlust wrote:
rammywhite wrote:
Rancid Robert wrote:Malky.the things that Gartside got right
No way- he's damaged goods now. That would be the same as having the payday loan company as sponsor. Dropping them was one of
He is possibly the only manager with any sort of experience who would even consider coming to our club if offered the  job.
And what is there to lose? We are already a laughing stock.

It seems he may be banned from football for a year according to this mornings papers.
 Are we a laughing stock? I wonder- others might see us as just one more club with some current problems to solve. We haven't disgraced ourselves in public- as Malky has.
What is there to lose? I think a lot. I know it might sound stupid to suggest that we still have some moral end ethical standards about us but given a choice between having some and having none ,most of us would choose to have some. Appointing Malky would destroy that. His emails were and are offensive ( whether private or public) and I'd rather do without someone like him at the club.

96Time to go, but who's next ? - Page 5 Empty Re: Time to go, but who's next ? Mon Aug 25, 2014 10:06 am

wanderlust

wanderlust
Nat Lofthouse
Nat Lofthouse

Hipster_Nebula wrote:Even I would rather have Jimmy Phillips, I'd have JP way way way way way down my list.
McKay is indeed objectionable however as someone who can't see a realistic appointment other than from within the club if it came to it, I'd love to see this lengthy list that JP is propping up. 

There aren't many experienced managers who are capable of working on no budget and willing to work for low wages and the only ones I can think of are currently in better jobs.

Who do you think would be a realistic option HN?

97Time to go, but who's next ? - Page 5 Empty Re: Time to go, but who's next ? Mon Aug 25, 2014 10:22 am

JAH

JAH
Tony Kelly
Tony Kelly

First and foremost we need a manager that has experienced a league promotion campaign so they know what it takes to set up the team for 40+ games. It doesn't have to be a promotion to the Prem tho that would be an advantage. However I thought JP didn't do a bad job and he must have seen enough of the background shenanigans to know now what not to do. If we couldn't find a suitable promotion experienced manager then JP and DL would be my first choice.

98Time to go, but who's next ? - Page 5 Empty Re: Time to go, but who's next ? Mon Aug 25, 2014 11:03 am

Hipster_Nebula

Hipster_Nebula
Nat Lofthouse
Nat Lofthouse

wanderlust wrote:
Hipster_Nebula wrote:Even I would rather have Jimmy Phillips, I'd have JP way way way way way down my list.
McKay is indeed objectionable however as someone who can't see a realistic appointment other than from within the club if it came to it, I'd love to see this lengthy list that JP is propping up. 

There aren't many experienced managers who are capable of working on no budget and willing to work for low wages and the only ones I can think of are currently in better jobs.

Who do you think would be a realistic option HN?

I'm not really high on anyone frankly, but surely we learnt that appointing a coach with no experience from within doesn't work, the only reason JP is mentioned is because he played for the club, simple. 

people were even willing to re-appoint our worst manager, possibly ever, to work alongside him they were that desperate to have a former player manage the team again. 

He might be the next Ferguson, but I'd rather we appointed on merit rather than sentiment. 

anyway I'll back the current manager until he's gone personally.

99Time to go, but who's next ? - Page 5 Empty Re: Time to go, but who's next ? Mon Aug 25, 2014 11:54 am

Natasha Whittam

Natasha Whittam
Nat Lofthouse
Nat Lofthouse

wanderlust wrote:
McKay is indeed objectionable however as someone who can't see a realistic appointment other than from within the club if it came to it,

Any manager in League 1 or 2 would give their right arm to be Bolton Wanderers manager. And quite a few in the Championship.

There are some great managers in the lower leagues, with proven records in finding good players for peanuts.

100Time to go, but who's next ? - Page 5 Empty Re: Time to go, but who's next ? Mon Aug 25, 2014 12:01 pm

wanderlust

wanderlust
Nat Lofthouse
Nat Lofthouse

Natasha Whittam wrote:
wanderlust wrote:
McKay is indeed objectionable however as someone who can't see a realistic appointment other than from within the club if it came to it,

Any manager in League 1 or 2 would give their right arm to be Bolton Wanderers manager. And quite a few in the Championship.

There are some great managers in the lower leagues, with proven records in finding good players for peanuts.


That's like saying they'd give their right arm to be ambidextrous.
Plus you have no evidence that any of them would be in the slightest bit interested in the poisoned chalice.

Sponsored content



Back to top  Message [Page 5 of 6]

Go to page : Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6  Next

Reply to topic

Permissions in this forum:
You can reply to topics in this forum