I'll make a sweeping generalistion and say that refs are only human. Unfortunately, that's not good enough in my book. I have witnessed blatant favouritism, highly subjective reading of situations and incompetence in equal measure over many years.
The only problem I have with refs is their inability to accept they're only human. They seldom if ever admit they've made a mistake, they defend the indefensible and they aren't open to suggestions or ideas to make their jobs easier.
Worst of all, they support illegal practices such as diving. If technological solutions were available at a cost which wouldn't disadvantage lower leagues, I'd happily get rid of refs in favour of a live panel of 10 or more people. If an incident occurs and >50% press the buzzer the game is stopped (equivalent to whistle) maximum 30 second review time (added back at the end of the half) and majority decision rules. Downtime measured to the second and added back.
Eliminate ref error - bring it on.
The only problem I have with refs is their inability to accept they're only human. They seldom if ever admit they've made a mistake, they defend the indefensible and they aren't open to suggestions or ideas to make their jobs easier.
Worst of all, they support illegal practices such as diving. If technological solutions were available at a cost which wouldn't disadvantage lower leagues, I'd happily get rid of refs in favour of a live panel of 10 or more people. If an incident occurs and >50% press the buzzer the game is stopped (equivalent to whistle) maximum 30 second review time (added back at the end of the half) and majority decision rules. Downtime measured to the second and added back.
Eliminate ref error - bring it on.