Should Scott be banned till after Christmas

Natasha Whittam wrote:

Soul Kitchen wrote:
Yes, homophobic statement!

What's homophobic about suggesting Scott took the hump because Breadman wouldn't return his affections?

I think it goes without any explanation, you wouldn't have a leg to stand on in court!
As I am from a different era I won't take your comment any further!!!

Soul Kitchen wrote:

Natasha Whittam wrote:

Soul Kitchen wrote:
Yes, homophobic statement!

What's homophobic about suggesting Scott took the hump because Breadman wouldn't return his affections?

I think it goes without any explanation, you wouldn't have a leg to stand on in court!
As I am from a different era I won't take your comment any further!!!

Nothing homophobic about what she said

Soul Kitchen wrote:

I think it goes without any explanation, you wouldn't have a leg to stand on in court!
As I am from a different era I won't take your comment any further!!!

I think you need to look up the definition of "homophobic".

I would have been overjoyed if Breadman and Scott had announced their engagement.

May as well wrap the whole site up if word play quips are going to be against the rules now.

We could just ban SK?

Copper Dragon wrote:May as well wrap the whole site up if word play quips are going to be against the rules now.

They're not...

bwfc1874 wrote:We could just ban SK?

Great idea. Bring back Scott & AD and ban sk

bwfc1874 wrote:We could just ban SK?

Just ban everyone who has a letter 's' in their moniker. 

Copper Dragon wrote:

bwfc1874 wrote:We could just ban SK?

Just ban everyone who has a letter 's' in their moniker. 

You can't ban the sites founder

Boggersbelief wrote:

Copper Dragon wrote:

bwfc1874 wrote:We could just ban SK?

Just ban everyone who has a letter 's' in their moniker. 

You can't ban the sites founder

Maybe we should just ban Burnley fans?

Boggersbelief wrote:

Soul Kitchen wrote:

Natasha Whittam wrote:

Soul Kitchen wrote:
Yes, homophobic statement!

What's homophobic about suggesting Scott took the hump because Breadman wouldn't return his affections?

I think it goes without any explanation, you wouldn't have a leg to stand on in court!
As I am from a different era I won't take your comment any further!!!

Nothing homophobic about what she said

Like you'd know?

bwfc1874 wrote:We could just ban SK?

Yeh right, look forward to it!!

Soul Kitchen wrote:
Yeh right, look forward to it!!

Me too.

Soul Kitchen wrote:

Boggersbelief wrote:

Soul Kitchen wrote:

Natasha Whittam wrote:

Soul Kitchen wrote:
Yes, homophobic statement!

What's homophobic about suggesting Scott took the hump because Breadman wouldn't return his affections?

I think it goes without any explanation, you wouldn't have a leg to stand on in court!
As I am from a different era I won't take your comment any further!!!

Nothing homophobic about what she said

Like you'd know?

You boring cunt

Boggersbelief wrote:

Soul Kitchen wrote:

Boggersbelief wrote:

Soul Kitchen wrote:

Natasha Whittam wrote:

Soul Kitchen wrote:
Yes, homophobic statement!

What's homophobic about suggesting Scott took the hump because Breadman wouldn't return his affections?

I think it goes without any explanation, you wouldn't have a leg to stand on in court!
As I am from a different era I won't take your comment any further!!!

Nothing homophobic about what she said

Like you'd know?

You boring cunt

If you say so!

karlypants wrote:Maybe we should just ban Burnley fans?

You can't do that because that would be racist.