Why Has This Site Gone To The Dogs?

Natasha Whittam wrote:

rammywhite wrote:I'm going to put my two pennyworth in here. I had decided to walk away from  Nuts about a month ago - mainly due to Breadman's comments. Because I disagreed with the way he was going to vote in the recent general election he referred to me as a c**t and someone who would go out and kick puppies to death and shit on the homeless.

Wasn't that just a general comment aimed at everyone who didn't vote Labour though?

Forums need villains. Forums need debate and argument. This site now has none of those.

rammywhite wrote:It might have been but it was still well beyond the pale of what anyone has to put up with. It was still personally abusive and not appropriate here. There are other websites where he could spew up his bile.

Natasha Whittam wrote:

rammywhite wrote:It might have been but it was still well beyond the pale of what anyone has to put up with. It was still personally abusive and not appropriate here. There are other websites where he could spew up his bile.

I think you've got selective memory, there's been loads of bile on this site over the years - I just think you chose to take this one personally.

Every site needs a mentalist. It used to be Amos, then Scott, then Bread.

Who's going to fill the void?

rammywhite wrote:

Natasha Whittam wrote:

rammywhite wrote:It might have been but it was still well beyond the pale of what anyone has to put up with. It was still personally abusive and not appropriate here. There are other websites where he could spew up his bile.

I think you've got selective memory, there's been loads of bile on this site over the years - I just think you chose to take this one personally.

Every site needs a mentalist. It used to be Amos, then Scott, then Bread.

Who's going to fill the void?

If you get called a c**t - what other way is there to take it apart from personally.
As regards filling the void- if the situations vacant, why don't you fill it

Natasha Whittam wrote:I have been traumatised by the comments made by rammy and Reebok Trotter.

Or, as I like to call it, bullery.

Are they being banned?

Natasha Whittam wrote:It's no wonder real women don't come on this site.

y2johnny wrote:

Natasha Whittam wrote:It's no wonder real women don't come on this site.

karlypants wrote:

y2johnny wrote:

Natasha Whittam wrote:It's no wonder real women don't come on this site.

Real women or the ones like Nat?

y2johnny wrote:Well theres manda and that other woman who lasted about 5 posts.  But yeah.... not nat

Natasha Whittam wrote:

y2johnny wrote:Well theres manda and that other woman who lasted about 5 posts.  But yeah.... not nat

y2johnny wrote:Keep your prosthetic cock on chickadee

Natasha Whittam wrote:

y2johnny wrote:Keep your prosthetic cock on chickadee

I've lost it. Does anyone know if KP is walking funny?

Leeds_Trotter wrote:I think everybody just missed me.

Sluffy wrote:

Leeds_Trotter wrote:I think everybody just missed me.

Of course we have LT!

How is your brother these days, does he still support the Wanderers?

Not seen him around for a while.

Will you both be coming to the Macron for the Leeds game?

Leeds_Trotter wrote:

Sluffy wrote:

Leeds_Trotter wrote:I think everybody just missed me.

Of course we have LT!

How is your brother these days, does he still support the Wanderers?

Not seen him around for a while.

Will you both be coming to the Macron for the Leeds game?

He's good thanks. I don't see him much, as I work a lot and so does he.

Yeah he does, once a Wanderer, always a Wanderer.

Not too sure about the Leeds game, all depends on work, would like to make it though. If not I've already booked to stop at the Whites Hotel for the Sheffield game as birthday treat to myself. Never stopped there before, so decided it was about time.