Bolton Wanderers could be in administration 'within hours'

Leeds_Trotter wrote:He's still denying it, I give up!

Who is it, where on twitter can I find your conversation?

It's on Facebook, I don't think it's right me mentioning his name when he isn't here to defend himself. I've asked him before to come join the forum, and join in the fun.

Leeds_Trotter wrote:It's on Facebook, I don't think it's right me mentioning his name when he isn't here to defend himself. I've asked him before to come join the forum, and join in the fun.

Ah, fair enough. I thought you were on twitter and I would have let you know if you were wasting your breath arguing with any of the most well known anti-Andersons.

To be honest if you are arguing with someone who doesn't even understand nor accept the fact that it is there in black and white that BluMarble secured their loan against the clubs assets, then you wasting your breath with them anyway and you might as well safe it because nothing you will say or prove will change their opinion.

Sluffy wrote:Who is it, where on twitter can I find your conversation?

He only sees this idiot when he looks in the mirror.

The bottom line of all this is that the club needs to be sold to whoever that actually has money to piss away.  4 million is just pocket change to owners of most of the bigger clubs. But that is enough to put us on the edge yet again. 
If the mysterious US Billionaire comes forward and doesn't mind losing money for a couple of years then we are theoretically set. That's the keyword "Billionaire"

It certainly worked out for Sunderland and Ellis Short.

Natasha Whittam wrote:

Sluffy wrote:Who is it, where on twitter can I find your conversation?

He only sees this idiot when he looks in the mirror.

A bit harsh that Nat.

karlypants wrote:

Natasha Whittam wrote:

Sluffy wrote:Who is it, where on twitter can I find your conversation?

He only sees this idiot when he looks in the mirror.

A bit harsh that Nat.

It's just Nats way of telling me she likes me.

T.R.O.Y wrote:It certainly worked out for Sunderland and Ellis Short.

So best to have an owner with nowt then?  

Nothing is 100% sure....but I'll go with a money man.

terenceanne wrote:

T.R.O.Y wrote:It certainly worked out for Sunderland and Ellis Short.

So best to have an owner with nowt then?  

Nothing is 100% sure....but I'll go with a money man.

An owner having the money doesn't necessarily mean he'd put the money in the club so it depends on who that person is - but at least they would have the potential to put in what's required and that would be an upgrade in itself. 
Plus Ellis Short is only just a billionaire by the skin of his teeth, so it's not like he's got loads of money to splash around

Short was generous enough to write off all Sunderland' s debt when he left, and paid the wages and tax bills, leaving them in a stronger position than for example Eddie Davies left us.