Reserve Wankers / Twitter posts

I think that this little shit storm is a convenient distraction for the club by getting the fans vitriol directed at the young players and away from the shit manager and useless Chairman.

Ask yourself why the Bolton News published an article which shows the club in a bad light? Because the club wanted the article published. The Bolton News paper is the mouth piece of the football club much like Pravda was the mouth piece of the Scocialist party in former USSR.

aaron_bwfc wrote:
I imagine DF lost Riley and Velas respect on his handling of Davies, still no exuse.

His handling of the Davies situation was exemplary, I don't know what else he should have done in that situation?

Davies wasn't happy about it and there were plenty on here criticising his reaction to being let go. Now the situation has changed and Dougie handled it poorly? Do me a favour Aaron.

Bolton Wanderers boss Dougie Freedman Tweets his young players mean after Twitter exchanges

Wanderers have taken a hard line with four young players for a series of controversial tweets sent within hours of Tuesday night’s derby defeat by Burnley.

Rob Hall, Josh Vela, Sanmi Odelusi and Joe Riley have landed themselves in hot water after a series of messages that were considered to be in breach of the club’s policy on the acceptable use of social media.

One of the messages sent after the 1-0 defeat, which has since been removed, contained the word “curtains” while other replies – a series of emoticons meant to express happiness and sadness – were also viewed dimly by Wanderers and a large number of our readers.

None of the players were involved in the defeat, which left Wanderers in 19th position in the Championship table and just two points above tomorrow’s opponents Millwall.

But speaking to The Bolton News yesterday, Dougie Freedman assured fans who have voiced their disapproval that the matter would be dealt with in-house.

“We are making sure it will never happen again and that they keep their thoughts to themselves,” he said.

“The young players seem to use it (social media) more than the older players and they seem to get caught out from time to time.

“The wording of it, the word ‘curtains,’ I’m not too sure what it actually means; we’ll have to ask the players that.”

It is not the first time Freedman has had to tackle issues with social media use within his squad.

A policy was introduced early last year that provided players with guidelines about their use of networking sites such as Twitter, Instagram and Facebook.

That decision was taken following a few high-profile incidents involving striker Marvin Sordell, who is currently on loan at Charlton Atheltic.

“These young lads can get dragged into things online and the way certain words are interpreted can cause problems,” admitted Freedman.

“They get carried away and a smiley face can sometimes read to fans like ‘why are you smiling after a game?’ He could have pressed the wrong button or anything like that.

“It is not a situation I think they should be putting themselves in.”

It is understood Freedman has now spoken to each of the four players individually to warn them about their future behaviour. Bolton Wanderers boss Dougie Freedman Tweets his young players mean after Twitter exchanges


[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

Just shows completely the wrong attitude imo.

You can't be a professional at anything if your attitude is all wrong.

Football is littered with many, many young and very gifted players, who never succeed in making the grade yet lesser gifted players go on to do so - simply because of their difference in attitude and determination.

So things are no going the way they want - then do something about it - rather than bitch in public. Put your heads down, do more training, graft, seek advice of how you can improve, support the team, work, work, work - prove to them you have got what it takes.

It's too easy these days to seek the limelight and become a minor celeb - Christ why are grown men even following these kids tweets anyway? - it is all about character and a willingness to fight and overcome - think Stuart Holden for instance - than acting like spoilt brats who haven't got their own way, on social media sites.

If they are going missing at academy level now, then they will go missing in matches when that 'fight' to overcome will be most needed.

I predict now that none of these four - no matter how talented they are - will make a career in football higher than where they are now. I don't believe they have the right character to do so, whilst many others will have.

JAH wrote:I think that this little shit storm is a convenient distraction for the club by getting the fans vitriol directed at the young players and away from the shit manager and useless Chairman.

Ask yourself why the Bolton News published an article which shows the club in a bad light? Because the club wanted the article published. The Bolton News paper is the mouth piece of the football club much like Pravda was the mouth piece of the Scocialist party in former USSR.

You can't seriously be dim enough to believe that?

bwfc1874 wrote:

JAH wrote:I think that this little shit storm is a convenient distraction for the club by getting the fans vitriol directed at the young players and away from the shit manager and useless Chairman.

Ask yourself why the Bolton News published an article which shows the club in a bad light? Because the club wanted the article published. The Bolton News paper is the mouth piece of the football club much like Pravda was the mouth piece of the Scocialist party in former USSR.

You can't seriously be dim enough to believe that?

Well, you're ugly enough to read it!

I'm glad the BEN has published an article about those players tweets. I was fooking annoyed about them and so were many other Bolton fans, from reading one or two other BWFC forums. I "tweeted" Mark Iles what these players said and I know he said the club were looking into it.

IMO the players have shown a total lack of professionalism and respect to BWFC.

Culcheth_White wrote:I'm glad the BEN has published an article about those players tweets. I was fooking annoyed about them and so were many other Bolton fans, from reading one or two other BWFC forums. I "tweeted" Mark Iles what these players said and I know he said the club were looking into it.

IMO the players have shown a total lack of professionalism and respect to BWFC.

Really by tweeting 'curtains' and some smilie faces and a picture of Hall with his head in his hands? If I've missed something please enlighten me.

I must be the only Wanderers fan that thinks this is blown out of all proportion. I don't see how it has brought the club into disrepute. It highlights the young players don't think much of the manager - much like most of us.

I await to be corrected if I have missed something here

JAH wrote:It highlights the young players don't think much of the manager

This is the point - you don't slate your boss and expect to get away with it[/quote]

They are employees of the club and as such have a duty to it.

We aren't - and haven't.

BoltonTillIDie wrote:

JAH wrote:It highlights the young players don't think much of the manager

This is the point - you don't slate your boss and expect to get away with it

Ok, but 'curtains' - slating your boss? Really. I could understand if it was a both barrels tirade of abuse directed at DF, but it was nothing like it. They thought (hoped) as we did that he'd be getting the sack after that game.

Should have kept it too themselves though - not post it up for the whole world to see on twitter.

Total lack of respect to the club that pays their wages.

They had the fans and clubs interest at heart in trying to highlight just how bad the management is

In their opinion though.

The opinion of the owner is that Freedman is doing the job he wants - otherwise he would have done something about it.

When the kids pay the piper then they can call the tune - but not until then.

They either get their heads down and get on with it, or they quit and move somewhere else.

That's what the rest of us have to do in real life.

JAH wrote:

Culcheth_White wrote:I'm glad the BEN has published an article about those players tweets. I was fooking annoyed about them and so were many other Bolton fans, from reading one or two other BWFC forums. I "tweeted" Mark Iles what these players said and I know he said the club were looking into it.

IMO the players have shown a total lack of professionalism and respect to BWFC.

Really by tweeting 'curtains' and some smilie faces and a picture of Hall with his head in his hands? If I've missed something please enlighten me.

I must be the only Wanderers fan that thinks this is blown out of all proportion. I don't see how it has brought the club into disrepute. It highlights the young players don't think much of the manager - much like most of us.

I await to be corrected if I have missed something here

^ this.

Sluffy wrote:In their opinion though.

The opinion of the owner is that Freedman is doing the job he wants - otherwise he would have done something about it.

When the kids pay the piper then they can call the tune - but not until then.

They either get their heads down and get on with it, or they quit and move somewhere else.

That's what the rest of us have to do in real life.

Well if this is the youth policy we hear so much about and you think it is what Ed wants then I guess it's time to prepare for relegation and trips down memory lane to see how all those other clubs we have met over the years ended up where they are today.

I'm looking forward to the real ale in Exeter already let's hope our days out and football is as much fun as we remember from our past visits.

Which absolute effing sad case is reading Andy Lonergan's wifes twitting thingy?

JAH wrote:

BoltonTillIDie wrote:

JAH wrote:It highlights the young players don't think much of the manager

This is the point - you don't slate your boss and expect to get away with it

Ok, but 'curtains' - slating your boss? Really. I could understand if it was a both barrels tirade of abuse directed at DF, but it was nothing like it. They thought (hoped) as we did that he'd be getting the sack after that game.

Why, so another manager could see they are simply not good enough? 

Time to grow up lads, put up or shut up as they say.

Copper Dragon wrote:Which absolute effing sad case is reading Andy Lonergan's wifes twitting thingy?

Pissoff Copper! She's well fit!  

carrs wrote:

Sluffy wrote:In their opinion though.

The opinion of the owner is that Freedman is doing the job he wants - otherwise he would have done something about it.

When the kids pay the piper then they can call the tune - but not until then.

They either get their heads down and get on with it, or they quit and move somewhere else.

That's what the rest of us have to do in real life.

Well if this is the youth policy we hear so much about and you think it is what Ed wants then I guess it's time to prepare for relegation and trips down memory lane to see how all those other clubs we have met over the years ended up where they are today.

I'm looking forward to the real ale in Exeter already let's hope our days out and football is as much fun as we remember from our past visits.

Personally I think Davies sees a much bigger picture to all of this than just the football club.

Why else would he allow his asset (the club) to plunge £170 million in debt and seemingly do nothing about it - same Chairman in all that time for instance?

Don't know what it might be mind but nothing else makes any other sense to me.

The club is just a means to an end for Davies I think and if so it probably doesn't really makes that much financial difference to him which division it plays in.  If that hypothesis is correct then you can see why it isn't important (or even cost effective) to get rid of Freedman and his backroom staff.

Can anybody come up with a better explanation to fit the facts?