I'm saying nothing. Haha.
Yet another Religious atrocity
+28
Jake McHale
Numpty 28723
Reebok_Rebel
Norpig
Boggersbelief
Natasha Whittam
wanderful life
Banks of the Croal
BoltonTillIDie
Sluffy
wanderlust
jusi333
Mr Magoo
okocha
bwfc71
mark leach
Reebok Trotter
White84
Bollotom2014
boltonbonce
Michael Bolton
scottjames30
Copper Dragon
karlypants
Soul Kitchen
Bwfc1958
Hipster_Nebula
xmiles
32 posters
542 Re: Yet another Religious atrocity Wed May 06 2015, 22:33
Copper Dragon
Ivan Campo
I blame Germany for the problem.
If Germany hadn't have started the Second World War then us and the Frogs would still be running half of these sand dwelling shops.
Try and get your head around that one then.
If Germany hadn't have started the Second World War then us and the Frogs would still be running half of these sand dwelling shops.
Try and get your head around that one then.
543 Re: Yet another Religious atrocity Thu May 07 2015, 00:26
Bolton Nuts
Admin
Reebok Trotter wrote:IF WE COULD JUST FIGURE OUT WHO'S CAUSING THE PROBLEM??
Let’s see, do I understand this thing correctly?
The Shoe Bomber was a Muslim
The Beltway Snipers were Muslims
The Fort Hood Shooter was a Muslim
The underwear Bomber was a Muslim
The U-S.S. Cole Bombers were Muslims
The Madrid Train Bombers were Muslims
The Bali Nightclub Bombers were Muslims
The London Subway Bombers were Muslims
The Moscow Theater Attackers were Muslims
The Boston Marathon Bombers were Muslims
The Pan-Am flight #93 Bombers were Muslims
The Air France Entebbe Hijackers were Muslims
The Iranian Embassy Takeover, was by Muslims
The Beirut U.S. Embassy bombers were Muslims
The Libyan U.S. Embassy Attack was by Muslims
The Buenos Aires Suicide Bombers were Muslims
The Israeli Olympic Team Attackers were Muslims
The Kenyan U.S, Embassy Bombers were Muslims
The Saudi, Khobar Towers Bombers were Muslims
The Beirut Marine Barracks bombers were Muslims
The Besian Russian School Attackers were Muslims
The first World Trade Center Bombers were Muslims
The Bombay & Mumbai India Attackers were Muslims
The Achille Lauro Cruise Ship Hijackers were Muslims
The September 11th 2001 Airline Hijackers were Muslims'
Think of it:
Buddhists living with Hindus = No Problem
Hindus living with Christians = No Problem
Hindus living with Jews = No Problem
Christians living with Shintos = No Problem
Shintos living with Confucians = No Problem
Confucians living with Baha'is = No Problem
Baha'is living with Jews = No Problem
Jews living with Atheists = No Problem
Atheists living with Buddhists = No Problem
Buddhists living with Sikhs = No Problem
Sikhs living with Hindus = No Problem
Hindus living with Baha'is = No Problem
Baha'is living with Christians = No Problem
Christians living with Jews = No Problem
Jews living with Buddhists = No Problem
Buddhists living with Shintos = No Problem
Shintos living with Atheists = No Problem
Atheists living with Confucians = No Problem
Confusians living with Hindus = No Problem
*********WHEREAS**************
Muslims living with Hindus = Problem
Muslims living with Buddhists = Problem
Muslims living with Christians = Problem
Muslims living with Jews = Problem
Muslims living with Sikhs = Problem
Muslims living with Baha'is = Problem
Muslims living with Shintos = Problem
Muslims living with Atheists = Problem
MUSLIMS LIVING WITH MUSLIMS = BIG PROBLEM
**********SO THIS LEADS TO *****************
They're not happy in Gaza
They're not happy in Egypt
They're not happy in Libya
They're not happy in Morocco
They're not happy in Iran
They're not happy in Iraq
They're not happy in Yemen
They're not happy in Afghanistan
They're not happy in Pakistan
They're not happy in Syria
They're not happy in Lebanon
They're not happy in Nigeria
They're not happy in Kenya
They're not happy in Sudan
******** So, where are they happy? **********
They're happy in Australia
They're happy in England
They're happy in Belgium
They're happy in France
They're happy in Italy
They're happy in Germany
They're happy in Sweden
They're happy in the USA & Canada
They're happy in Norway & India
They're happy in almost every country that is not Islamic!
And who do they blame? Not Islam... Not their leadership... Not themselves...
THEY BLAME THE COUNTRIES THEY ARE HAPPY IN!!
And they want to change the countries they're happy in, to be like the countries they came from where they were unhappy and finally they will get hammered !!!!
Islamic Jihad: AN ISLAMIC TERROR DIRECTIVE
ISIS : AN ISLAMIC TERROR ORGANIZATION
Al-Qaeda: AN ISLAMIC TERROR ORGANIZATION
Taliban: AN ISLAMIC TERROR ORGANIZATION
Hamas: AN ISLAMIC TERROR ORGANIZATION
Hezbollah: AN ISLAMIC TERROR ORGANIZATION
Boko Haram: AN ISLAMIC TERROR ORGANIZATION
Al-Nusra: AN ISLAMIC TERROR ORGANIZATION
Abu Sayyaf: AN ISLAMIC TERROR ORGANIZATION
Al-Badr: AN ISLAMIC TERROR ORGANIZATION
Muslim Brotherhood: AN ISLAMIC TERROR ORGANIZATION
Lashkar-e-Taiba: AN ISLAMIC TERROR ORGANIZATION
Palestine Liberation Front: AN ISLAMIC TERROR ORGANIZATION
Ansaru: AN ISLAMIC TERROR ORGANIZATION
Jemaah Islamiyah: AN ISLAMIC TERROR ORGANIZATION
Abdullah Azzam Brigades: AN ISLAMIC TERROR ORGANIZATION
AND A LOT MORE !!!!!!!
I'm sorry, I'm completely stumped......
Any idea who's causing the problem?
Wow.
544 Re: Yet another Religious atrocity Thu May 07 2015, 09:57
Soul Kitchen
Ivan Campo
xmiles wrote:Nice one RT!
545 Re: Yet another Religious atrocity Tue May 12 2015, 09:02
xmiles
Jay Jay Okocha
Just in case anyone has forgotten the "religion of peace":
http://m.bbc.co.uk/news/world-asia-32701001
http://m.bbc.co.uk/news/world-asia-32701001
546 Re: Yet another Religious atrocity Tue May 12 2015, 09:47
Hipster_Nebula
Nat Lofthouse
They're not "real muslims" though because they interpret the word of God literally.
urmmm.
urmmm.
547 Re: Yet another Religious atrocity Wed May 13 2015, 18:15
Hipster_Nebula
Nat Lofthouse
Did you see that rumour those 3 girls want to come "home" don't know if it's true was posted by an "Iraqi blog"
548 Re: Yet another Religious atrocity Wed May 13 2015, 18:23
Bollotom2014
Andy Walker
Hipster_Nebula wrote:Did you see that rumour those 3 girls want to come "home" don't know if it's true was posted by an "Iraqi blog"
Oops! I thought they thought they were already home. But they are Brits so get em back as is their right, straight to court, get 20 years, problem solved
549 Re: Yet another Religious atrocity Wed May 13 2015, 18:27
Hipster_Nebula
Nat Lofthouse
Nah, I'd refuse them entry, ridiculous that they'd be allowed back in.
550 Re: Yet another Religious atrocity Wed May 13 2015, 18:46
Soul Kitchen
Ivan Campo
Bollotom2014 wrote:Hipster_Nebula wrote:Did you see that rumour those 3 girls want to come "home" don't know if it's true was posted by an "Iraqi blog"
Oops! I thought they thought they were already home. But they are Brits so get em back as is their right, straight to court, get 20 years, problem solved
Yeh and pay to keep them in luxury?
Fook that!!!
Leave the country to join Idiotic Shit heads of the Islamic State and shut the door behind you. There's only their family's want them back. Perhaps if the family hadn't been participating in free range parenting they would still be in Britain!?!
551 Re: Yet another Religious atrocity Wed May 13 2015, 19:01
Sluffy
Admin
End of the day they are still just three little girls.
We all make mistakes.
They've not gone to kill anyone.
If the story is true I'd let them back.
Maybe they could then tell others that the IS are not is 'romantic' as many of these deluded muslim youth think.
We all make mistakes.
They've not gone to kill anyone.
If the story is true I'd let them back.
Maybe they could then tell others that the IS are not is 'romantic' as many of these deluded muslim youth think.
552 Re: Yet another Religious atrocity Wed May 13 2015, 21:52
Hipster_Nebula
Nat Lofthouse
welcome to that opinion but 16 is not "little" we're not talking 8 and 9 year olds who aren't capable of making fully informed decisions.
and frankly we don't know what they've done over there, ISIS regularly employ "cubs" (minors) to shoot hostages.
Just a couple of weeks ago she posted a picture of her ISIS "takeaway" meal.
and frankly we don't know what they've done over there, ISIS regularly employ "cubs" (minors) to shoot hostages.
Just a couple of weeks ago she posted a picture of her ISIS "takeaway" meal.
553 Re: Yet another Religious atrocity Wed May 13 2015, 22:12
Sluffy
Admin
Well you are right that I've no idea what they have done in the last few months - I've no idea either what this takeaway picture was either.
I would be suprised though that 15 year old girls who have mixed with western values - they were all attending school regularly I believe - all expected to be getting 'A's - to suddenly be able to shoot to kill people.
Of couse you can make informed decissions at 15 or 16 but you are more likely to also get them completely wrong at that age too. How many of us 'knew it all' at their age - and realise we know a great deal better now!?
Maybe I have more of a parent's perspective on this issue as I've experienced first hand relatively recently my daughter at that age - and the views, opinions, social interactions, etc, that she had at that age - and can compare how they've changed in to a more mature outlook in the few years since.
If I'm wrong and these young women have been involved in atrocities already then it's hard to see them returning to our shores without some sort of custodial sentence.
In that case it begs the question as to why would they want to return anyway?
I would be suprised though that 15 year old girls who have mixed with western values - they were all attending school regularly I believe - all expected to be getting 'A's - to suddenly be able to shoot to kill people.
Of couse you can make informed decissions at 15 or 16 but you are more likely to also get them completely wrong at that age too. How many of us 'knew it all' at their age - and realise we know a great deal better now!?
Maybe I have more of a parent's perspective on this issue as I've experienced first hand relatively recently my daughter at that age - and the views, opinions, social interactions, etc, that she had at that age - and can compare how they've changed in to a more mature outlook in the few years since.
If I'm wrong and these young women have been involved in atrocities already then it's hard to see them returning to our shores without some sort of custodial sentence.
In that case it begs the question as to why would they want to return anyway?
554 Re: Yet another Religious atrocity Thu May 14 2015, 10:47
Hipster_Nebula
Nat Lofthouse
Jihadi john mixed with western values and then proceeded to cut people's heads off with a pocket knife.
These girls know exactly what isis are all about.
These girls know exactly what isis are all about.
555 Re: Yet another Religious atrocity Thu May 14 2015, 10:49
Boggersbelief
Nat Lofthouse
I'd gladly leave them to rot. But this pathetic government will bring them back and I'll have to foot the bill of their rehabilitation/supervision.
556 Re: Yet another Religious atrocity Thu May 14 2015, 15:54
xmiles
Jay Jay Okocha
Sluffy wrote:Well you are right that I've no idea what they have done in the last few months - I've no idea either what this takeaway picture was either.
I would be suprised though that 15 year old girls who have mixed with western values - they were all attending school regularly I believe - all expected to be getting 'A's - to suddenly be able to shoot to kill people.
Of couse you can make informed decissions at 15 or 16 but you are more likely to also get them completely wrong at that age too. How many of us 'knew it all' at their age - and realise we know a great deal better now!?
Maybe I have more of a parent's perspective on this issue as I've experienced first hand relatively recently my daughter at that age - and the views, opinions, social interactions, etc, that she had at that age - and can compare how they've changed in to a more mature outlook in the few years since.
If I'm wrong and these young women have been involved in atrocities already then it's hard to see them returning to our shores without some sort of custodial sentence.
In that case it begs the question as to why would they want to return anyway?
You make some reasonable points Sluffy but I don't believe that they were really that naive or innocent not to know what they were getting involved with. I also think their parents are at least partly responsible for them turning out like this. The only reason for letting them back is to be used as counter propaganda but I doubt they will cooperate anyway.
557 Re: Yet another Religious atrocity Thu May 14 2015, 16:56
Sluffy
Admin
I must be living a very sheltered life then if three school girls, non of them old enough to vote, drive, or buy a drink (not that these three would anyway) and still get 'child' prices at places like the cinema, public transport, theme parks, etc - suddenly decide that chopping people's heads off in an 'idealistic' world a thousand or so miles away is what they 'really' want to be doing.
Of course they would be affected by how they were brought up - we all are - but the fact that they hid from their family's that they had plans to go to Syria - and their family's seemingly genuine shock and fear for their children when they did go - suggests to me at least that they knew they would not get their family's blessing to go and thus did not fully understand why that would be or what in reality they would actually be facing.
Yes Jiahdi John knew western culture too but he was that much older and cynical/radicalised when he first tried to join the 'jihad' in Africa, then returned to face the security forces of this country before again slipping off to Syria to kill people.
I also think that the nature of Islam as different demands of men and women - and that a womans job is not primarily to join a jihad to fight.
Anyway it's all meaningless. No one knows for sure if the girl/s do want to come back - and as far as I know, as British citizens born in this country, we can't stop them from returning if they wanted to - all we can do is 'punish them' if they do - and even then, at their age - it would be as 'juveniles', rather than as in the 'adult' courts.
Of course they would be affected by how they were brought up - we all are - but the fact that they hid from their family's that they had plans to go to Syria - and their family's seemingly genuine shock and fear for their children when they did go - suggests to me at least that they knew they would not get their family's blessing to go and thus did not fully understand why that would be or what in reality they would actually be facing.
Yes Jiahdi John knew western culture too but he was that much older and cynical/radicalised when he first tried to join the 'jihad' in Africa, then returned to face the security forces of this country before again slipping off to Syria to kill people.
I also think that the nature of Islam as different demands of men and women - and that a womans job is not primarily to join a jihad to fight.
Anyway it's all meaningless. No one knows for sure if the girl/s do want to come back - and as far as I know, as British citizens born in this country, we can't stop them from returning if they wanted to - all we can do is 'punish them' if they do - and even then, at their age - it would be as 'juveniles', rather than as in the 'adult' courts.
558 Re: Yet another Religious atrocity Thu May 14 2015, 18:25
Soul Kitchen
Ivan Campo
At the very least they must have known they'd be used for pleasuring men?
559 Re: Yet another Religious atrocity Thu May 14 2015, 18:44
Sluffy
Admin
At 15 years old - and probably brought up in a strict muslim family's - I would imagine they would have only the 'romantasied' version of 'love' in their heads and no sexual experience what-so-ever, so I doubt they knew anything at all about pleasuring men - and would be very much more likely to be expecting to get married first before even having any sex at all!
Virginity is very important in the muslim community - that's why all these muslim dominated child sex cases almost always involve non muslim women.
Virginity is very important in the muslim community - that's why all these muslim dominated child sex cases almost always involve non muslim women.
560 Re: Yet another Religious atrocity Fri May 15 2015, 11:47
Hipster_Nebula
Nat Lofthouse
Interesting comments from Abu Bakr Al Baghdadi the leader of IS.
"Islam was never a religion of peace. Islam is the religion of fighting. No-one should believe that the war that we are waging is the war of the Islamic State. It is the war of all Muslims, but the Islamic State is spearheading it. It is the war of Muslims against infidels."
Similar topics
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum