Would you tackle a Muslim bush

Back on topic I like gardening and I will trim any persons bush, thick bushy tall or small.

But taking extremism out of the equation there are a lot more muslims than 0.03% in this country who dont want to integrate and.in doing so alienate themselves and make it harder for people to understand there way of life

Im not saying i want them all walking down the street with a can of strongbow in one hand a bacon sandwich in the other but a lot of there outdated practices in the faith they follow is what causes the unrest

The Muslim ladies I've known (3) did what they like with their bushes and I'd suggest that the preference is for waxing "clean" i.e. bald (completely) based on 66.66% of the sample, although that could be cultural as they were both from the same country, whereas the neatly trimmed lady was from a different country.

I see white84 went fishing yesterday and got one hell of a bite. I don't think he's cleverer than he seems at all. If he was,he would be able to construct a half decent sentence while he talks shit. 
I don't get offended by 84. He's a thick cunt. I just don't get his obsession with Muslims and the burning bush references he makes on every thread even though he clearly has no idea what he's talking about. He says he wouldn't do a hairy Muslim woman, which implies that if the woman was white, he would. That is why he's been banned for racism.
For some reason Nat has double standards. S/he once said, "you wouldn't say it in public if you were surrounded by the race in question so why put it on here". Seems to think it's ok when 84 does it though.

Bwfc1958 wrote:
For some reason Nat has double standards. S/he once said, "you wouldn't say it in public if you were surrounded by the race in question so why put it on here". Seems to think it's ok when 84 does it though.

Don't take my quotes out of context you bellend. As I've said many times, 84 is a racist prick, but I think it serves this site better to leave his comments up so everyone can see what a dipshit he is.

It depends what you deem to be "extreme views." No doubt we all agree that shooting and bombing falls under that term, but I also believe many views held by "moderate muslims" do as well. 

as this video at the "muslim peace conference" attests. 

Why hasn't Hipster been banned? He spends his life spouting religious hate.

The vast majority of religious people are not terrorists or about to burn down his Aberdeen love pad.

Anybody with a reasonable mind will agree there is nothing hateful about my posts, and certainly didn't accuse all religious people of "being terrorists" so if you'll retract and delete the above post please.

Hipster_Nebula wrote:Anybody with a reasonable mind will agree there is nothing hateful about my posts, and certainly didn't accuse all religious people of "being terrorists" so if you'll retract and delete the above post please.

You're just (slightly) more intelligent than White84, you spout your hate by highlighting news stories where religion is thought to be the factor behind something bad. You never highlight the many more bad things done by so called non religious people.

Open up your heart and let God guide you.

According to the Noble Quran,  Muhammad claimed in Sura 2:282 that one male witness is equal to 2 female witnesses in a Sharia court. Secular democratic laws say that they both are equal. Who gives women equal rights ? Not Sharia law, that's for sure! 
In the book "101 myths of the Bible", Greenberg proved that the biblical stories in the Jewish Bible had their origins in Egyptian mythology.. Christians and Muslims later plagiarized the very same mythical stories from the Jewish bible into their so called holy books.

Still waiting for you to delete the post insinuating that I called religious people terrorists.

According to the Noble Quran: 


Muhammad claimed in Sura 24:06: "And for those who launch a charge against their wives, accusing them of fornication, but have no witnesses or evidence, except themselves-which happened with some companions-then the testimony of one of them, if he swears by Allah 4 times, shall be considered equal to 4 testimonies"


 That means that the husband will be considered truthful in accusing his wife of committing fornication in the eyes of Allah just by swearing 4 times". 

According to the Noble Quran: 


 
 Muhammad in his last sermon said ," Clothe and feed your women if they obey you.". 
It is like treating women as domestic animals. Feed them, if they obey you? 
Secular laws say women are our equal partners and soul mates. Who would you follow?

Thats just religious hate RT, nothing like stymieing debates by accusing the other side of prejudice.

Hipster_Nebula wrote:Thats just religious hate RT, nothing like stymieing debates by accusing the other side of prejudice.

That seems to be quite a common trait on Nuts!

Reebok Trotter wrote:According to the Noble Quran,  Muhammad claimed in Sura 2:282 that one male witness is equal to 2 female witnesses in a Sharia court. Secular democratic laws say that they both are equal. Who gives women equal rights ? Not Sharia law, that's for sure! 
In the book "101 myths of the Bible", Greenberg proved that the biblical stories in the Jewish Bible had their origins in Egyptian mythology.. Christians and Muslims later plagiarized the very same mythical stories from the Jewish bible into their so called holy books.

I think you are barking up the wrong tree here RT given that Christianity is a Jewish ripoff/offshoot, both Jews and Christians worship the same God i.e. the God of Abraham, the Old Testament is basically the Talmud and the New Testament is culturally outdated yet partially accepted in Islam - Jesus being the third most important Muslim prophet.

The Bible gives absolutely no rights to women whatsoever as it is assumed that women are slaves and chattel with no say in anything as was the custom at the time.

Quoting the Koran to point out sections which no longer fit with western ideology (bearing in mind that English women were worse off than slaves at the time the Koran was written so what is promised therein is a substantial improvement in circumstances and light years ahead of the West in terms of rights for women) is just biased.

Then there's the mixed messages:
How does "Thou shalt not kill" stack up against Luke 19:27 "But as for these enemies of mine, who did not want me to reign over them, bring them here and slaughter them before me."? Is Christianity the religion of war and murder?

The Bible contains a lot of "eye for an eye" nonsense and you don't have to look hard to find it - and there are still millions of Americans who live by the literal word of the Bible (mainly in Alabama TBF)

There are Jewish, Christian and Muslim extremist religious fanatics and yet only Muslims get labelled as if they are all extremists such is the extent of Western paranoia and xenophobia. It used to be the Jews, even though we share a God with them. Some day we have to stop tagging an entire religion with a few extremists.

Again it depends on what your definition of extreme is.

Although alarming, Islam Net and the members of it all have extremist ideology which they frame as moderate. I can only speak for Britain but I think it's pretty obvious that not all Muslims are in favour of stonings.

They've no choice living here though, they'd end up in prison. I'm not suggesting they are in favour, I simply don't know but I've seen a lot of debates where muslim scholars are unable or unwilling to denounce the punishments for apostasy, homosexuality and adultery, it's quite clear thats a grey area.