Bolton Wanderers Football Club Fan Forum for all BWFC Supporters.


You are not connected. Please login or register

Film and TV review.

+31
Hip Priest
Leeds_Trotter
Dinae Moe Humm
Jamster26
Soul Kitchen
WhiteBic
Sgt. Bash
terenceanne
Bernard Dennis Park
Mr Magoo
Reebok_Rebel
Banks of the Croal
mark leach
Michael Bolton
BoltonTillIDie
Mo
largehat
Dunkels King
doffcocker
Quent
gloswhite
Angry Dad
xmiles
Sluffy
aaron_bwfc
bwfc71
Keegan
Hipster_Nebula
wanderlust
Natasha Whittam
Reebok Trotter
35 posters

Go to page : Previous  1 ... 18 ... 32, 33, 34 ... 41 ... 50  Next

Go down  Message [Page 33 of 50]

641Film and TV review. - Page 33 Empty Re: Film and TV review. Sun Dec 16 2012, 19:41

Hipster_Nebula

Hipster_Nebula
Nat Lofthouse
Nat Lofthouse

Reebok Trotter wrote:My favourite character was the gerbil who worked in the office. Edgar Stiles ( I imagine BH looks like him )

Edgar was amazing. one
Spoiler:

642Film and TV review. - Page 33 Empty Re: Film and TV review. Sun Dec 16 2012, 20:13

Reebok Trotter

Reebok Trotter
Nat Lofthouse
Nat Lofthouse

Hipster_Nebula wrote:
Reebok Trotter wrote:My favourite character was the gerbil who worked in the office. Edgar Stiles ( I imagine BH looks like him )

Edgar was amazing. one
Spoiler:

I agree.

643Film and TV review. - Page 33 Empty Re: Film and TV review. Sun Dec 16 2012, 21:38

Reebok Trotter

Reebok Trotter
Nat Lofthouse
Nat Lofthouse

Fabrice gets a mention on SPOTY!

644Film and TV review. - Page 33 Empty Re: Film and TV review. Sun Dec 16 2012, 21:40

Reebok Trotter

Reebok Trotter
Nat Lofthouse
Nat Lofthouse

78 minutes? Unbelievable!

645Film and TV review. - Page 33 Empty Re: Film and TV review. Sun Dec 16 2012, 21:41

BoltonTillIDie

BoltonTillIDie
Nat Lofthouse
Nat Lofthouse

More than a mention, he's being interviewed now

646Film and TV review. - Page 33 Empty Re: Film and TV review. Sun Dec 16 2012, 21:54

Reebok Trotter

Reebok Trotter
Nat Lofthouse
Nat Lofthouse

He came across very well. It makes you wonder if Marc Vivian Foe could have been saved if we knew back then what we know now.

647Film and TV review. - Page 33 Empty Re: Film and TV review. Mon Dec 17 2012, 07:13

Reebok Trotter

Reebok Trotter
Nat Lofthouse
Nat Lofthouse

Well done to Bradley Wiggins!

648Film and TV review. - Page 33 Empty Re: Film and TV review. Mon Dec 17 2012, 14:07

Sgt. Bash

Sgt. Bash
Andy Walker
Andy Walker

Reebok Trotter wrote:Well done to Bradley Wiggins!

Seconded.

649Film and TV review. - Page 33 Empty Re: Film and TV review. Mon Dec 17 2012, 14:11

Natasha Whittam

Natasha Whittam
Nat Lofthouse
Nat Lofthouse

I find cycling very boring, hence I didn't watch it. There's very little skill in cycling.

650Film and TV review. - Page 33 Empty Re: Film and TV review. Mon Dec 17 2012, 14:31

Sluffy

Sluffy
Admin

Lt. Boon wrote:
Reebok Trotter wrote:Well done to Bradley Wiggins!

Seconded.

Agreed!

I don't want to be a wet blanket or anything but for those who don't follow cycling too closely, everything fell perfectly into place for Wiggins last year and will unlikely to do so again.

In the Tour for instance you need a combination of different skills to win it, Wiggins greatest skill is as a Time Trialist and the 2012 Tour was such that it gave the Time Trialist the biggest advantage - this certainly is not the case in the 2013 route. Also his two biggest rivals (not counting Evans who was there) did not race (both being tainted with drug abuse) and both should be back next year.

Similarly the gold he won at the Olympics was for Time Trialing (his strength) but again his two biggest rivals (different to the Tour two) who he could not beat in 2011, were both off form (or maybe the drug controls were tighter?), one even crashed in the Olympic road race event that was held a few days before the event Wiggins won.

But you can only beat the riders you are up against and fair play to Wiggins, he certainly was the best at the Olympics and the only man that could possibly have beaten him on the Tour was in Wiggins team and thus was riding to instructions - thus had to help Wiggins rather than compete against him - hence his two major wins of the year.

Well done though Bradley and all the best for 2013!

651Film and TV review. - Page 33 Empty Re: Film and TV review. Mon Dec 17 2012, 15:38

Natasha Whittam

Natasha Whittam
Nat Lofthouse
Nat Lofthouse

Sluffy wrote:

Agreed!

I don't want to be a wet blanket or anything but for those who don't follow cycling too closely, everything fell perfectly into place for Wiggins last year and will unlikely to do so again.

In the Tour for instance you need a combination of different skills to win it, Wiggins greatest skill is as a Time Trialist and the 2012 Tour was such that it gave the Time Trialist the biggest advantage - this certainly is not the case in the 2013 route. Also his two biggest rivals (not counting Evans who was there) did not race (both being tainted with drug abuse) and both should be back next year.

Similarly the gold he won at the Olympics was for Time Trialing (his strength) but again his two biggest rivals (different to the Tour two) who he could not beat in 2011, were both off form (or maybe the drug controls were tighter?), one even crashed in the Olympic road race event that was held a few days before the event Wiggins won.

But you can only beat the riders you are up against and fair play to Wiggins, he certainly was the best at the Olympics and the only man that could possibly have beaten him on the Tour was in Wiggins team and thus was riding to instructions - thus had to help Wiggins rather than compete against him - hence his two major wins of the year.

Well done though Bradley and all the best for 2013!

You need two things for cycling as far as I can see:

1) Legs to pedal with
2) A bunch of big team-mates who can block anyone from getting level/past you.

652Film and TV review. - Page 33 Empty Re: Film and TV review. Mon Dec 17 2012, 15:42

Sluffy

Sluffy
Admin

3) A bike!

653Film and TV review. - Page 33 Empty Re: Film and TV review. Mon Dec 17 2012, 15:43

BoltonTillIDie

BoltonTillIDie
Nat Lofthouse
Nat Lofthouse

Natasha Whittam wrote:
Sluffy wrote:

Agreed!

I don't want to be a wet blanket or anything but for those who don't follow cycling too closely, everything fell perfectly into place for Wiggins last year and will unlikely to do so again.

In the Tour for instance you need a combination of different skills to win it, Wiggins greatest skill is as a Time Trialist and the 2012 Tour was such that it gave the Time Trialist the biggest advantage - this certainly is not the case in the 2013 route. Also his two biggest rivals (not counting Evans who was there) did not race (both being tainted with drug abuse) and both should be back next year.

Similarly the gold he won at the Olympics was for Time Trialing (his strength) but again his two biggest rivals (different to the Tour two) who he could not beat in 2011, were both off form (or maybe the drug controls were tighter?), one even crashed in the Olympic road race event that was held a few days before the event Wiggins won.

But you can only beat the riders you are up against and fair play to Wiggins, he certainly was the best at the Olympics and the only man that could possibly have beaten him on the Tour was in Wiggins team and thus was riding to instructions - thus had to help Wiggins rather than compete against him - hence his two major wins of the year.

Well done though Bradley and all the best for 2013!

You need two things for cycling as far as I can see:

1) Legs to pedal with
2) A bunch of big team-mates who can block anyone from getting level/past you.

3) A Bicycle

654Film and TV review. - Page 33 Empty Re: Film and TV review. Mon Dec 17 2012, 15:53

Natasha Whittam

Natasha Whittam
Nat Lofthouse
Nat Lofthouse

Sluffy wrote:3) A bike!

No one likes a clever clogs.

655Film and TV review. - Page 33 Empty Re: Film and TV review. Mon Dec 17 2012, 15:54

Natasha Whittam

Natasha Whittam
Nat Lofthouse
Nat Lofthouse

BoltonTillIDie wrote:

3) A Bicycle

Ditto.

656Film and TV review. - Page 33 Empty Re: Film and TV review. Mon Dec 17 2012, 15:55

bwfc71

bwfc71
Ivan Campo
Ivan Campo

More like said in "tandem"


Ok I'll get my coat.....

657Film and TV review. - Page 33 Empty Re: Film and TV review. Mon Dec 17 2012, 19:36

Hipster_Nebula

Hipster_Nebula
Nat Lofthouse
Nat Lofthouse

Well quickly watched the homeland finale .... no plot details under the spoiler just my opinion.

Spoiler:

658Film and TV review. - Page 33 Empty Re: Film and TV review. Mon Dec 17 2012, 19:51

Natasha Whittam

Natasha Whittam
Nat Lofthouse
Nat Lofthouse

I haven't watched the finale, but the penultimate episode was tired and appeared to have run out of ideas. I can't believe there's a season 3 in the pipeline.

I'd rather they brought back 24. And where's the 24 movie??

659Film and TV review. - Page 33 Empty Re: Film and TV review. Mon Dec 17 2012, 19:57

Hipster_Nebula

Hipster_Nebula
Nat Lofthouse
Nat Lofthouse

It's apparently going into production soon.

660Film and TV review. - Page 33 Empty Re: Film and TV review. Mon Dec 17 2012, 19:59

Natasha Whittam

Natasha Whittam
Nat Lofthouse
Nat Lofthouse

Hipster_Nebula wrote:It's apparently going into production soon.

They could have filmed two seasons of the tv show in the time it's taken them to get this far with the film - it's not as if Keifer Sutherland's career has exactly blossomed. That crap on Sky1 called Touch was bobbins.

Sponsored content



Back to top  Message [Page 33 of 50]

Go to page : Previous  1 ... 18 ... 32, 33, 34 ... 41 ... 50  Next

Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum