Fans take important step towards creation of a Supporters' Trust at Bolton

http://www.bwfcforum.com

Mavis forum.

Thank you Kane and Sluffy, we're all a bit wiser now.

I think!!

Cajunboy wrote:http://www.bwfcforum.com

Mavis forum.

I'm amazed it's still going with about 5 posts per week.

4 on a good week!

This thread is a perfect example of how quite a few on this site take these forums and the internet way too seriously.

A pretty shameful way to treat folk who are trying to do something about Bolton's plight as well.

You should be pulling together on this and not giving a shit about who's who on a forum and who said what on a forum.

I really can't believe some of the babyhouse shite on this thread.

Copper Dragon wrote:This thread is a perfect example of how quite a few on this site take these forums and the internet way too seriously.

A pretty shameful way to treat folk who are trying to do something about Bolton's plight as well.

You should be pulling together on this and not giving a shit about who's who on a forum and who said what on a forum.

I really can't believe some of the babyhouse shite on this thread.

If I'm one of those you are referring to then all I can say is that if you have experienced first hand some of the shenanagins that I've had to endure from some of the 'anonymous 8', then I think you too may be cautious of singing their praises from the roof tops.

I don't hold with the view that people on the internet are completely different in real life - I tend to think it is more like their true colours are revealed when they think they can get away scot free from any responsibility they have for their words or actions.

If people are prepared to screw you in real life (true story) because they don't like something you may have said or done on a small football forum would you think that this same person or persons would be the best people to get behind and support over anything, let alone trying to become the voice of the fans on a supporters Trust!

I don't.

I don't have a problem with the ST just some of those who are behind it.



(For the record Chris Manning is not who I am referring to above).

I don't know who any of these people are but even if the only thing that comes from having a supporters trust is we are better informed about what goes on at the club then surely it can only be a good thing. 

What could these people possibly do to make things worse than they already are? 

Or is that a bit of a simplistic view and they could somehow have disastrous consequences? 

If you are pessimistic about them, what is your main worry? 

I am interested to know if there is a possible negative side to a supporters trust, because as it is, i can't see one.

I'm obviously not making myself very clear on this.

I don't have a problem with a ST being established.

I do however have issues with one or two people I believe to be behind it.

Is that any better?

I understand that bit sluffy but what negative effects do  you think these characters you have an issue with will have on the trust if they are elected?

I think the st is a great idea. I have even made peace with kane. Crispy cock (im making this stick bd) on the other hand is a massive tool. I think he had a brother in your year 58. He was in my year though

Bwfc1958 wrote:I understand that bit sluffy but what negative effects do  you think these characters you have an issue with will have on the trust if they are elected?

If the whole aim is to represent the voice of the fans to the new owners as they claim and they try to fuck you in real life because of something you said or done on an internet footy forum - do you really think they would do the job fairly or simply put their own views and opinions across?

My view is that some of these people have their own agenda as to what influence they can gain from this and I simply rather they were not involved at all.

y2johnny wrote:I think the st is a great idea. I have even made peace with kane. Crispy cock (im making this stick bd) on the other hand is a massive tool.  I think he had a brother in your year 58.  He was in my year though

Doesn't ring any bells with me Johnny. Do you know his brothers name?

Sluffy wrote:

Bwfc1958 wrote:I understand that bit sluffy but what negative effects do  you think these characters you have an issue with will have on the trust if they are elected?

If the whole aim is to represent the voice of the fans to the new owners as they claim and they try to fuck you in real life because of something you said or done on an internet footy forum - do you really think they would do the job fairly or simply put their own views and opinions across?

My view is that some of these people have their own agenda as to what influence they can gain from this and I simply rather they were not involved at all.

Fair enough sluff, you know them better than I so we can only hope this is not the case. 

Time will tell i suppose.

Bwfc1958 wrote:

y2johnny wrote:I think the st is a great idea. I have even made peace with kane. Crispy cock (im making this stick bd) on the other hand is a massive tool.  I think he had a brother in your year 58.  He was in my year though

Doesn't ring any bells with me Johnny. Do you know his brothers name?

Last name is peacock. May have been a year below.

y2johnny wrote:

Bwfc1958 wrote:

y2johnny wrote:I think the st is a great idea. I have even made peace with kane. Crispy cock (im making this stick bd) on the other hand is a massive tool.  I think he had a brother in your year 58.  He was in my year though

Doesn't ring any bells with me Johnny. Do you know his brothers name?

Last name is peacock.  May have been a year below.

Bloody hell Johnny, i gathered that bit. 

I was hoping for a first name.

Bwfc1958 wrote:

y2johnny wrote:

Bwfc1958 wrote:

y2johnny wrote:I think the st is a great idea. I have even made peace with kane. Crispy cock (im making this stick bd) on the other hand is a massive tool.  I think he had a brother in your year 58.  He was in my year though

Doesn't ring any bells with me Johnny. Do you know his brothers name?

Last name is peacock.  May have been a year below.

Bloody hell Johnny, i gathered that bit. 

I was hoping for a first name.

He might have been the year below you i think.

bwfcst wrote:For those who cannot get to the Macron tomorrow we are investigating streaming the meeting using Periscope. This means the video will be available live on your smartphone.
If you want to stream the meeting via Periscope you MUST be following the BWFCST Twitter account & have the Periscope app installed on your phone

https://twitter.com/BWFCST

Super smashing great.

Thanks

(That sounds sarcy, it wasn't meant to be, i meant it)

Bwfc1958 wrote:

y2johnny wrote:

Bwfc1958 wrote:

y2johnny wrote:I think the st is a great idea. I have even made peace with kane. Crispy cock (im making this stick bd) on the other hand is a massive tool.  I think he had a brother in your year 58.  He was in my year though

Doesn't ring any bells with me Johnny. Do you know his brothers name?

Last name is peacock.  May have been a year below.

Bloody hell Johnny, i gathered that bit. 

I was hoping for a first name.

Andrew?