There's a story in the papers this morning about Jamie Oliver and other chefs calling for the public to boycott supermarket milk. Supermarkers have, apparently, driven the cost of milk so far down that farmers are now producing it at a loss.
Now it sounds like bullshit to me, why would a farmer produce milk at a loss?
Personally, I am tired of farmers pleading poverty. If it doesn't rain enough they plead poverty because they don't have enough crop, if it rains too much they plead poverty, if the petrol price rises they plead poverty etc.
My parents live in the country and their house is inbetween two farms. Both farmers drive top of the range cars, their kids go to private school, and they both have spanking new machinery. They don't appear to be in poverty.
So are the farmers pissed off because they are just a little less rich or are they really struggling?
Now it sounds like bullshit to me, why would a farmer produce milk at a loss?
Personally, I am tired of farmers pleading poverty. If it doesn't rain enough they plead poverty because they don't have enough crop, if it rains too much they plead poverty, if the petrol price rises they plead poverty etc.
My parents live in the country and their house is inbetween two farms. Both farmers drive top of the range cars, their kids go to private school, and they both have spanking new machinery. They don't appear to be in poverty.
So are the farmers pissed off because they are just a little less rich or are they really struggling?