Boggersbelief wrote:That we agree on, DERIK is the better player but you don't change a winning side
I only do it because I know it bugs you
Go to page : 1, 2, 3
Boggersbelief wrote:That we agree on, DERIK is the better player but you don't change a winning side
terenceanne wrote:Can't win 'em all .....but why do we lose to bottom feeders like this.....just what is the point of a double change in the 85th minute.
Chalk this one off then.
I agree he missed a relatively easy one vs Gillingham too, hopefully it's something he can work on in trainingMartinBWFC wrote:Seeing the highlights, Zach Clough doesn't half miss a lot of 1 on 1s, he's missed a load this season.
Still think it was complacency that cost us the game.Bread2.0 wrote:whatsgoingon wrote:I don't think PP leaves any room for complacency and the work ethic seems to be there whoever we play, Peterborough aside we have maintained a level of performance.wanderlust wrote:The thing that worries me about this one is complacency because Chesterfield are fighting for survival and our lads are doing well. Providing they are up for it we should win comfortably but they should be in no doubt that Chesterfield will have a proper go.
I'm going 2-0
I love the comment in the Gary Madine article where he says that after coming off after one game with cries of "Fuck off, Madine!" still ringing in his ears, Parky basically pulled him and said "Listen, this lot think you're shit. You can sulk about it or prove them wrong. What's it gonna be?"
No mollycoddling from our Phil it would appear.
And it looks like it's working.
wanderlust wrote:Still think it was complacency that cost us the game.Bread2.0 wrote:whatsgoingon wrote:I don't think PP leaves any room for complacency and the work ethic seems to be there whoever we play, Peterborough aside we have maintained a level of performance.wanderlust wrote:The thing that worries me about this one is complacency because Chesterfield are fighting for survival and our lads are doing well. Providing they are up for it we should win comfortably but they should be in no doubt that Chesterfield will have a proper go.
I'm going 2-0
I love the comment in the Gary Madine article where he says that after coming off after one game with cries of "Fuck off, Madine!" still ringing in his ears, Parky basically pulled him and said "Listen, this lot think you're shit. You can sulk about it or prove them wrong. What's it gonna be?"
No mollycoddling from our Phil it would appear.
And it looks like it's working.
Natasha Whittam wrote:Boggers, you forget I can see you on the site even though you hide yourself (never understood why someone does that??)
You were on here throughout the game yesterday. I don't think you were in Chesterfield.
Boggersbelief wrote:
I'm always online as I don't have any friends because I smell funny.
Bread2.0 wrote:Boggersbelief wrote:
I'm always online as I don't have any friends because I smell funny.
Fixed that for you.
Bread2.0 wrote:Yes, and every single one of them was worth reading.
Unlike your output.
Boggersbelief wrote:
I'm always online as I don't log out.. why would anyone log on and off every time they visit forum?
But thanks for confirming that you also didn't go, join wandy and bread on the sofa
Sad, very sadNatasha Whittam wrote:
I didn't go, I live for Saturday Afternoons watching Bolton Nuts
Natasha Whittam wrote:Boggersbelief wrote:
I'm always online as I don't log out.. why would anyone log on and off every time they visit forum?
But thanks for confirming that you also didn't go, join wandy and bread on the sofa
If you're inactive for an hour it removes you from the registered users online, yet you were there the whole game.
So either you went to the game and spent the whole 90 minutes reading Nuts, or you're lying.
I didn't go, I have much better things to do than waste a whole Saturday watching Bolton.
As do I when I can. I just don't make a big song and dance about it.Boggersbelief wrote:Natasha Whittam wrote:Boggersbelief wrote:
I'm always online as I don't log out.. why would anyone log on and off every time they visit forum?
But thanks for confirming that you also didn't go, join wandy and bread on the sofa
If you're inactive for an hour it removes you from the registered users online, yet you were there the whole game.
So either you went to the game and spent the whole 90 minutes reading Nuts, or you're lying.
I didn't go, I have much better things to do than waste a whole Saturday watching Bolton.
No it doesn't, It only removes you if you log off . I actually go to games, thanks
wanderlust wrote:As do I when I can. I just don't make a big song and dance about it.Boggersbelief wrote:Natasha Whittam wrote:Boggersbelief wrote:
I'm always online as I don't log out.. why would anyone log on and off every time they visit forum?
But thanks for confirming that you also didn't go, join wandy and bread on the sofa
If you're inactive for an hour it removes you from the registered users online, yet you were there the whole game.
So either you went to the game and spent the whole 90 minutes reading Nuts, or you're lying.
I didn't go, I have much better things to do than waste a whole Saturday watching Bolton.
No it doesn't, It only removes you if you log off . I actually go to games, thanks
Go to page : 1, 2, 3
Similar topics
Permissions in this forum:
You can reply to topics in this forum