Breadman. The Return?

boltonbonce wrote:Does this mean that any personal abuse will result in a ban?

I'll look forward to receiving a death threat.

Or being called a gobshite.

Natasha Whittam wrote:

boltonbonce wrote:Does this mean that any personal abuse will result in a ban?

I'll look forward to receiving a death threat.

Or being called a gobshite.

Shut up you moaning gobshite. What a bellend.

You're close to a death threat.

rammywhite wrote:

Natasha Whittam wrote:

boltonbonce wrote:Does this mean that any personal abuse will result in a ban?

I'll look forward to receiving a death threat.

Or being called a gobshite.

Shut up you moaning gobshite. What a bellend.

You're close to a death threat.

Nat- you never fail to deliver satisfaction!!

Natasha Whittam wrote:

boltonbonce wrote:Does this mean that any personal abuse will result in a ban?

I'll look forward to receiving a death threat.

Or being called a gobshite.

Shut up you moaning gobshite. What a bellend.

You're close to a death threat.

boltonbonce wrote:Does this mean that any personal abuse will result in a ban?

I'll look forward to receiving a death threat.

Or being called a gobshite.

Sluffy wrote:The 'conditions' are no more than he behaves like the rest of us.

Hardly draconian.

Also we aren't 'begging' him to come back, Nuts has not died a death without him as some boldly claimed we would, rather it's up to him if he wants to return but if he does he needs to pack in all the personal abuse.

Seems fair and reasonable to me.

Kane57 wrote:This is all very dramatic and exciting

Kane57 wrote:This is all very dramatic and exciting