Fwiw I've been reading up a bit on the history of Ukraine - yes I know it's not a sort of a thing that most people do - but I've always thought if you can understand how we got here you have a better chance to see which direction we are heading to.
Ok my source material is Wiki and I guess it isn't guaranteed to be correct but I wouldn't have though anyone would be bothered enough to tell a pack of lies about Ukraine's history a century or more ago?
Well it seems as recently that until a couple of century's ago there really wasn't much to be bothered about in Ukraine, is wasn't occupied much and seemed to just have a nomadic population wandering about it.
It was claimed and fought over by countries such as Lithuania (absolutely miles away to the north) The Ottoman Empire [Think Turkey] (miles to the south across the Black Sea), Poland, Russia and Austria (Hapsburg Empire and all that).
At different times all these countries ruled it (or large chunks of it) and it only really began to form when Russia 'took it on' and its people started to settle there.
Unlike Britain, France, Germany, etc, who built their empires across 'the water' (Australia, New Zealand, Canada, South Africa, Rhodesia, etc) Russia started to expand and colonise the 'land' adjoining it.
They moved into Crimea for instance and we fought a war with Russia to stop then expanding and gaining access to an all year round sea route an influence in the sphere of the world.
Nobody really 'won' the war but Russia seemed to have ended up 'owning' Crimea (this is worth noting for later).
It was because of fears of Russian expansion that we fought our first war in Afghanistan to stop them getting too close to India.
Here's a map of who owned what following Russia moving into the Crimea - as you will see Ukraine simply doesn't exist as such.
The ethnic Ukrainians around that time came from nomads and garrisoned soldiers during the period that most of the area was known as the Wild Fields' -
By the 17th century, the east part of the Wild Fields had been settled by runaway peasants and serfs who made up the core of the Cossackdom.[9] During the Bohdan Khmelnytsky Uprising the north part of this area was settled by Cossacks from the Dnieper basin and came to be known as Sloboda Ukraine. After a series of Russo-Turkish wars waged by Catherine the Great, the area formerly controlled by the Ottomans and the Crimean Tatars was incorporated into the Russian Empire in the 1780s. The Russian Empire built many of the cities in the Wild Fields, including Odessa, Sevastopol, Yekaterinoslav, and Nikolayev. Most of Kyiv was also built during this time. The area was filled with Russian and Ukrainian settlers and the name "Wild Fields" became outdated; it was instead referred as New Russia (Novorossia).[10] According to the Historical Dictionary of Ukraine, "The population consisted of military colonists from hussar and lancer regiments, Ukrainian and Russian peasants, Cossacks, Serbs, Montenegrins, Hungarians, and other foreigners who received land subsidies for settling in the area
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wild_FieldsGradually through various wars and treaties over the years Russia took over the area, which took on the name of 'Little Russia' - this map is from 1904 -
After WW1 Russia fell into Civil War eventually won by Lenin.
Ukraine had made an attempt to be independent from Russia but that didn't go anywhere and by 1922 had become a founding member of the USSR.
Under the USSR Ukraine 'grew' in that parts of other 'countries' where incorporated into it including the Crimea from Russia) -
It stayed like that until 1990 when the USSR collapsed and the Ukraine became a country in it's own right.
Since then the country has drifted more towards the west and away from Russia's sphere of influence.
In 2004 Ukraine held a general election between a pro Russian candidate and a pro western one - the pro Russian won - but the election was clearly rigged.
There were large demonstrations held because of the fixing of the result and suddenly the pro western candidate leading the protest was stuck down after being poisoned! In the end though the pro-western candidate did take charge and began to build bridges to the west.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Orange_RevolutionThe protestors were greatly helped by the west and in particular the USA and when the next general election was held in 2010 the pro Russian candidate won - but look at the voting pattern on this map - the country was clearly split in half as to who they wanted to win.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2010_Ukrainian_presidential_electionThe pro Russian then started to undo all the pro west stuff that had been done and build bridges back to Russia - this led to large scale public protests -
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/EuromaidanBasically this led to the overthrow of the government, Russia taking back the Crimea and these 'independent' enclaves in the Ukraine that Russia has just recognised as independent states.
Note that although we the west have kicked up a fuss about that, we did more or less the same thing when we recognised Kosovo -
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kosovo#After_declaration_of_independenceAll in all I can understand a bit more of Putin's argument.
Obviously sorting it out with tanks isn't the right way to go about it but it seems that there are parts of the Ukraine whose people do want to be closer to Russia than the west.
I've no idea how things will be figured out in the end but as they say the pen is mightier than the sword (ultimately anyway!).