Ten Bobsworth wrote:Sorry Sluffy but I'm seeing no red flag there, neither am I seeing two businesses. I'm seeing one business that they thought they might run as a limited company before deciding that that game wasn't worth the candle. It costs next to nothing to set up a company but you will start to incur bigger professional fees if you run a business as a limited company.
I agree and that is why I said the first business set up as a limited company and voluntary struck off is legally a separate entity to a second business set up to take the place of it.
Dr Dickenson is therefore not being completely open in stating he is the owner of Ibidem Sports for 11 years.
He's actually been the owner of Ibidem Sports
Limited for two years and a separate business Ibidem Sports for the 8 years since he voluntarily struck off (closed) Ibidem Sports
Limited.
All petty and somewhat meaningless I agree but nevertheless if the good Doctor is somewhat inaccurate in his own public statement about himself then it doesn't inspire confidence to me at least in a project he seems to be named as the head of, dealing with other peoples information.
At the end of the day the Ibidem Sports website states that basically the information being collected by the likes of young Conor will be used to 'leverage' brands of sports companies and/or their sponsors to the very sports fans answering Conor's question.
Or in simple words the aim of the exercise is not to benefit us sports fans in any way but to manipulate the information we freely give them so that they can specifically target us to sell us things.
Do you feel comfortable doing that Conor?
It wouldn't be something I would want to be doing myself.