Operation Yewtree

Angry Dad wrote:I heard they have arrested freddie starr again today.

I can't say I am surprised. He shot himself in the foot when he told the press that he had never appeared on TV with Jimmy Savile. He claimed to have only met Savile twice in his whole life. Once when Savile turned up with his mother to watch one of his shows and the other time when he bumped into him in a Tailor's shop in London.

One of Savile's victims gave a detailed account about how she was abused by Savile on a TV show where Freddy Starr was also present. Investigators trawled through the TV archives and found the relevant footage which clearly showed Starr as being present.

When the evidence was put to Starr he claimed it was over 30 years ago and he couldn't remember it. Pull the other one.

Breadman wrote:

Reebok Trotter wrote:I am not going to mention any names on here but there are underground rumours that there are two very big celebrities out there who still appears regularly on TV who are rumoured to have  monster injunctions in place against them being named. The Courts have deemed that if they are charged then the injunctions will be lifted.

I always knew them Krankies were dodgy......

The Krankies have openly admitted they were swingers. Fcuk knows what any red blooded male would see in them. I'm concerned that the Benidorm producers created the characters of Donald and Jacqueline Stewart as a parody of the Krankies.

You know far too much about all this shit......

I make it my business to keep ABREAST of such matters. Forewarned is forearmed. I don't wish to have a visit from Mr Plod putting my door in at 5am because I start work at 6.

Do you know that if Plod wreck your front door and porch by forcibly entering with a search warrant, they are not obliged to pay any compensation for the damage to your property providing they charge you?

It pays to know about these things.

Rolf is as innocent as the pure driven snow but as for that hairy cornflake fella I hope and really expect it to be a case of guilty as charged. I've always hated that mouthy arrogant fucker. He'll brazenly stand in front of the TV cameras,plead his innocence and call his accusers compensation chasers even if he knows 100% he is guilty as charged.

Makes me laugh how the judge has to tell the jurors not to confuse old cockroach with ken Barlow when listening to his crimes. Does he actually need to do that.

Hip Priest wrote: Rolf is as innocent as the pure driven snow but as for that hairy cornflake fella I hope and really expect it to be a case of guilty as charged. I've always hated that mouthy arrogant fucker. He'll brazenly stand in front of the TV cameras,plead his innocence and call his accusers compensation chasers even if he knows 100% he is guilty as charged.

Totally feel the same about the cereal groper he,s alway's given me the creeps and never liked the way the way he called people pilchards and stuff it came across as genuine like you say arrogant fucker. I really hope Rolf is innocent I really do but what have they got on him must be something?

He'll have let some young kid blow his didgeridoo and the kid will have got mixed up. All seems a bit iffy on this one to me.

Rolf don't look like he's long for this world it's killing him.

I met Rolf when my kids were young in panto when we visited my aunt in Eastbourne he was a top bloke  find this one hard to believe but you just don't know anymore. Katie Bush will be gutted.

Rolf's BIG problem is his home computer! When the rozzers stormed his crib he wasn't home so they carted off his home PC for technical analysis. He faces four charges of making indecent photos of a child which basically means he downloaded indecent images of sexual child abuse. He has not yet entered a plea on the computer charges, which seems rather odd!

Putting the computer evidence to one side, it is interesting to note that one of Rolf's victims was only seven or eight when the offences allegedly took place so you can draw your own conclusions as to his sexual leanings and preferences.

Think it's looking quite bad for Rolf in reality, but of all of these celebs who've been fingered lately (no pun intended) he is the only one I'd be genuinely gutted about if it turns out to be true.

Reebok Trotter wrote:Rolf's BIG problem is his home computer! When the rozzers stormed his crib he wasn't home so they carted off his home PC for technical analysis. He faces four charges of making indecent photos of a child which basically means he downloaded indecent images of sexual child abuse. He has not yet entered a plea on the computer charges, which seems rather odd!

Putting the computer evidence to one side, it is interesting to note that one of Rolf's victims was only seven or eight when the offences allegedly took place so you can draw your own conclusions as to his sexual leanings and preferences.

  I'm speechless, looks like he is guilty for the lot!

If someone can download these images etc from the net and know where to get them says a lot.

If you have gone to the extent of searching the web for these images and downloading them then it doesn't take much more effort to molester kids I reckon.

What I find particularly disturbing, if true, is that the images were downloaded quite recently. Rolf is in his early eighties so why the fcuk is he interested in such filth at his time of life. I wouldn't have thought there was much lead left in his pencil to start with.

Reebok Trotter wrote:What I find particularly disturbing, if true, is that the images were downloaded quite recently. Rolf is in his early eighties so why the fcuk is he interested in such filth at his time of life. I wouldn't have thought there was much lead left in his pencil to start with.

Well he was probably always into it.

That fucker savile  sure opened a can of worms by dying.

Natasha Whittam wrote:Rolf is definitely innocent.

Tell us how you reach that conclusion Nat ?

Angry Dad wrote:

Natasha Whittam wrote:Rolf is definitely innocent.

Tell us how you reach that conclusion Nat ?

She met him once and he must of seemed a nice chap, so he must be innocent.

Natasha Whittam wrote:Rolf is definitely innocent.

You insult dougie freedman relentlessly but are quite happy to defend a suspected paedophile.. Strange.

Have you ever met him as a young girl Nat?