This is an old story that sheds light on how bad things were financially 2 years ago - before Dougie came in and when our wage bill was spiralling out of control.
Clearly there's a lot more to it, especially in terms of assets but I guess that taking the parachute payments as loan equity implies that any assets the club may have bought were not particularly liquid at that time so the Bank insisted on the cash.
I sometimes wonder if the very public austerity and penny-pinching phase that Dougie is having to endure is purely to give the Banks the impression that the club is doing everything in it's power to prevent further losses.
But from my recollection the club's football -related losses were minor in comparison with the trading losses as a whole as I believe that most of it was investment in land, infrastructure and buildings - which will have a balancing residual value going forward.
E.g if the club loses £30 million on trading and also buys land etc for £120 million during a year the trading loss for the year is £150 million.
But the club now has £120 million worth of new assets and if that land becomes a shopping mall and leisure centre etc the initial outlay will get paid back fairly quickly.
So providing the club owns the assets it's not a problem as long as the club stops losing money via football activities - which Dougie has clearly been tasked to do.
Clearly there's a lot more to it, especially in terms of assets but I guess that taking the parachute payments as loan equity implies that any assets the club may have bought were not particularly liquid at that time so the Bank insisted on the cash.
I sometimes wonder if the very public austerity and penny-pinching phase that Dougie is having to endure is purely to give the Banks the impression that the club is doing everything in it's power to prevent further losses.
But from my recollection the club's football -related losses were minor in comparison with the trading losses as a whole as I believe that most of it was investment in land, infrastructure and buildings - which will have a balancing residual value going forward.
E.g if the club loses £30 million on trading and also buys land etc for £120 million during a year the trading loss for the year is £150 million.
But the club now has £120 million worth of new assets and if that land becomes a shopping mall and leisure centre etc the initial outlay will get paid back fairly quickly.
So providing the club owns the assets it's not a problem as long as the club stops losing money via football activities - which Dougie has clearly been tasked to do.