okocha wrote:
.......and yet, Nat, your current avatar is a photo of a famous French actress, and a recent one was of a TV soft porn star.......expliquez, s'il vous plait.
No one likes a stalker.
okocha wrote:
.......and yet, Nat, your current avatar is a photo of a famous French actress, and a recent one was of a TV soft porn star.......expliquez, s'il vous plait.
Natasha Whittam wrote:okocha wrote:
.......and yet, Nat, your current avatar is a photo of a famous French actress, and a recent one was of a TV soft porn star.......expliquez, s'il vous plait.
No one likes a stalker.
I'm simply curious as to why, when you state that you considered it mandatory to use photos of self on an avatar, you chose instead to post photos of glamorous women (Mary Whitehouse excepted!) to represent yourself falsely.Natasha Whittam wrote:okocha wrote:
.......and yet, Nat, your current avatar is a photo of a famous French actress, and a recent one was of a TV soft porn star.......expliquez, s'il vous plait.
No one likes a stalker.
okocha wrote:
I'm simply curious as to why, when you state that you considered it mandatory to use photos of self on an avatar, you chose instead to post photos of glamorous women (Mary Whitehouse excepted!) to represent yourself falsely.
As for stalking, I'd have thought that you'd welcome any attention, since all your posts scream, "Look at me! Look at me!"
By the way, there's a world of difference between actual stalking and simply exposing someone as a fraud.
Very good. I'd write" touche" if I knew how to use the keyboard to do an acute accent on the "e".......As a demoiselle, you should be able to instruct me, however.Natasha Whittam wrote:okocha wrote:
I'm simply curious as to why, when you state that you considered it mandatory to use photos of self on an avatar, you chose instead to post photos of glamorous women (Mary Whitehouse excepted!) to represent yourself falsely.
As for stalking, I'd have thought that you'd welcome any attention, since all your posts scream, "Look at me! Look at me!"
By the way, there's a world of difference between actual stalking and simply exposing someone as a fraud.
You make the mistake of presuming I'm not a famous French actress who dabbles in soft porn.
norpigs bukkake partyokocha wrote:Very good. I'd write" touche" if I knew how to use the keyboard to do an acute accent on the "e".......As a demoiselle, you should be able to instruct me, however.Natasha Whittam wrote:okocha wrote:
I'm simply curious as to why, when you state that you considered it mandatory to use photos of self on an avatar, you chose instead to post photos of glamorous women (Mary Whitehouse excepted!) to represent yourself falsely.
As for stalking, I'd have thought that you'd welcome any attention, since all your posts scream, "Look at me! Look at me!"
By the way, there's a world of difference between actual stalking and simply exposing someone as a fraud.
You make the mistake of presuming I'm not a famous French actress who dabbles in soft porn.
One other thing:- in that case, why did you dye your hair from glossy blonde to dull ginger and turn your face from glowing to pasty?
Jkbjackson wrote:Alain traore, striker at lorient.going off his record dont look to great, 120 appearances in 10 year!
That's 12 appearances a year. Not bad really if you compare him to maviesJkbjackson wrote:Alain traore, striker at lorient.going off his record dont look to great, 120 appearances in 10 year!
Or Stuart Holden. Compared to him this guy looks overworked!Bwfc1958 wrote:That's 12 appearances a year. Not bad really if you compare him to maviesJkbjackson wrote:Alain traore, striker at lorient.going off his record dont look to great, 120 appearances in 10 year!
Outstanding Keegan! But I will now hide this post from my wife.Keegan wrote:I'm a sexy, busty redhead. Inside.
Hold me?
Magoo could drool all he wants mate. Wendy's mine.Keegan wrote:You don't want Magoo to see a picture of her, I'm sure.
Similar topics
Permissions in this forum:
You can reply to topics in this forum