Should we be bombing the IS?

Soul Kitchen wrote:Back on bombing. I see the police have arrested 69 suspected British returning from Syria under suspicion of fighting with IS. 
I wonder if it got a bit too dangerous for them and their botty started to squeeze. Women, children and unarmed soldiers are a much easier target! 
As I've said before, if found guilty strip the fuckers naked and let them wander round Catterick barracks, Allah will look after them.

Bollotom2014 wrote:I can't understand your fixation about AD and myself. I promise you I am not AD, I swear it on my Mother's life. And where have I ever said that I am well-read or that I am good at spelling and punctuation? I see some punctuation errors but not the spelling mistakes. And I certainly have never pointed to being erudite in any way. Perhaps you would be so kind as to point the spelling mistakes out.  And "Choice of tone." Now how can you detect 'Tone' in the written word, particularly the written words of a stranger?
It would seem that from your very first post you have been nasty and unwelcoming to the point of bullying. And why on Earth would I pretend to have a harem? And knock 5 blokes out with one punch? What kind of superiority do you think you have that you can make such observations without knowing a person. I don't mind what you have to say to or about me but please allow a balance of fairness in your responses, not something you think will appear clever. With almost 5000 posts you must be a favourite and not used to inattention, so it's understandable you look down on newbies.
Oh and Sluffy. I don't know him, just that it didn't click that the Admin title was also the boss.

Oh, and Beatles and Genesis FFS! I'm better than that. LMAO
Well, that's my say, hope I didn't send you to sleep.

Breadman wrote:http://www.dailystar.co.uk/news/latest-news/402235/British-terrorists-jailed-after-attempt-sneak-UK

bwfc1874 wrote:To be honest after his first few posts I had a feeling it was AD, then his winding up of Sluffy at the first opportunity proved it for me. 

Yet another fool who should be banned - although technically another of the same original fool. Ban them all.

Bollotom2014 wrote:

bwfc1874 wrote:To be honest after his first few posts I had a feeling it was AD, then his winding up of Sluffy at the first opportunity proved it for me. 

Yet another fool who should be banned - although technically another of the same original fool. Ban them all.

I don't know how many times I have to deny being AD, and I do not wind people up, but your ideas on censorship are perhaps wrong, and ban me? Is that how you view all posters who have something to say? So you are wrong about my ID being AD, wrong about me winding anyone up, and wrong about me being a fool. You probably would end up posting to yourself if you had any hand in running this site so you are the fool. Now if you don't like me I'll get along with that, just ignore me, I can accept that too. After all, you're only fishing for a bite. And that is my very last post on the subject of AD. 

Bollotom2014 wrote: I don't intend seeming to winding people up, but I'm probably my own worst enemy in that I can't bite my tongue. Cheers.

Reebok Trotter wrote:

Bollotom2014 wrote: I don't intend seeming to winding people up, but I'm probably my own worst enemy in that I can't bite my tongue. Cheers.

Don't ever bite your tongue. Part of the beauty of this site is that freedom of expression is tolerated by and large. The mods are a pretty tolerant bunch and let's face it, it would be a boring place if we all shared the same opinion.

Bollotom2014 wrote:

bwfc1874 wrote:To be honest after his first few posts I had a feeling it was AD, then his winding up of Sluffy at the first opportunity proved it for me. 

Yet another fool who should be banned - although technically another of the same original fool. Ban them all.

I don't know how many times I have to deny being AD, and I do not wind people up, but your ideas on censorship are perhaps wrong, and ban me? Is that how you view all posters who have something to say? So you are wrong about my ID being AD, wrong about me winding anyone up, and wrong about me being a fool. You probably would end up posting to yourself if you had any hand in running this site so you are the fool. Now if you don't like me I'll get along with that, just ignore me, I can accept that too. After all, you're only fishing for a bite. And that is my very last post on the subject of AD. 

bwfc1874 wrote:Fair enough RT, just the similarity in the way he posts and reacts to some of ADs characters. Last I'll say about it though. 

On record that I called it first(ish) though.