I suspect you're going to pay handsomely for that comment.......
For the love of God......No!
+3
Bwfc1958
Hipster_Nebula
Natasha Whittam
7 posters
Go to page : 1, 2, 3, 4
22 Re: For the love of God......No! Wed Dec 17, 2014 4:14 pm
wanderlust
Nat Lofthouse
Natasha Whittam wrote:Breadman wrote:We all know there's nothing worse than having your evening ruined by having to deal with a particularly thick and unsightly bush
PM me for hairy bush tips.
Tips for birds #47:
The best way to get rid of unwanted pubic hair is to floss regularly.
23 Re: For the love of God......No! Wed Dec 17, 2014 6:01 pm
Natasha Whittam
Nat Lofthouse
Ha ha, people moaning because they can't use the c-word on a football forum.
If you need the c-word to get your message across I suggest you are an uneducated tugboat and have no place being on a site with myself, White84 and Magoo.
If you need the c-word to get your message across I suggest you are an uneducated tugboat and have no place being on a site with myself, White84 and Magoo.
24 Re: For the love of God......No! Wed Dec 17, 2014 6:19 pm
Bwfc1958
Tinned Toms - You know it makes sense!
I'll go with bellend in future. No danger of that ever getting sensored seeing as that's the site owners favourite word. While we're on the subject, are there any other variations of the word vagina that are not allowed. Here's one. Twat. How about that?
25 Re: For the love of God......No! Wed Dec 17, 2014 6:23 pm
boltonbonce
Nat Lofthouse
Here's another one.Bwfc1958 wrote: Here's one. Twat.
26 Re: For the love of God......No! Wed Dec 17, 2014 6:24 pm
Guest
Guest
Natasha Whittam wrote:Ha ha, people moaning because they can't use the c-word on a football forum.
If you need the c-word to get your message across I suggest you are an uneducated tugboat and have no place being on a site with myself, White84 and Magoo.
Never mind all that, answer the big question:
Was it you behind the bins at the back of Bargain Booze like Karl says?
Dirty cow.
27 Re: For the love of God......No! Wed Dec 17, 2014 6:27 pm
Natasha Whittam
Nat Lofthouse
Bwfc1958 wrote:I'll go with bellend in future. No danger of that ever getting sensored seeing as that's the site owners favourite word. While we're on the subject, are there any other variations of the word vagina that are not allowed. Here's one. Twat. How about that?
So you need to use the c-word to express yourself? Genuine question.
28 Re: For the love of God......No! Wed Dec 17, 2014 6:29 pm
Bwfc1958
Tinned Toms - You know it makes sense!
You've posted the wrong picture. It was meant to be Brucieboltonbonce wrote:Here's another one.Bwfc1958 wrote: Here's one. Twat.
29 Re: For the love of God......No! Wed Dec 17, 2014 6:31 pm
Bwfc1958
Tinned Toms - You know it makes sense!
Sometimes it just seems appropriate. Dougie Frreedman, David Cameron, Russell Brand, Bruce Forsyth. I could go on.......Natasha Whittam wrote:Bwfc1958 wrote:I'll go with bellend in future. No danger of that ever getting sensored seeing as that's the site owners favourite word. While we're on the subject, are there any other variations of the word vagina that are not allowed. Here's one. Twat. How about that?
So you need to use the c-word to express yourself? Genuine question.
30 Re: For the love of God......No! Wed Dec 17, 2014 6:36 pm
Natasha Whittam
Nat Lofthouse
Bwfc1958 wrote:
Sometimes it just seems appropriate. Dougie Frreedman, David Cameron, Russell Brand, Bruce Forsyth. I could go on.......
There are plenty of other words that won't offend people and put off potential new members. Don't you think I deserve a bigger audience?
32 Re: For the love of God......No! Wed Dec 17, 2014 6:42 pm
karlypants
Nat Lofthouse
Her silence speaks volumes!
33 Re: For the love of God......No! Wed Dec 17, 2014 6:43 pm
Natasha Whittam
Nat Lofthouse
Breadman, get a life you ponce.
34 Re: For the love of God......No! Wed Dec 17, 2014 6:47 pm
Guest
Guest
That'd be a yes then.
Did he take you to places you'd only ever dreamed of previously?
Was it beautiful?
Did you get stale beer and fag ends all over your knees?
Did he take you to places you'd only ever dreamed of previously?
Was it beautiful?
Did you get stale beer and fag ends all over your knees?
35 Re: For the love of God......No! Wed Dec 17, 2014 6:47 pm
Bwfc1958
Tinned Toms - You know it makes sense!
You're right. I apologise. The word bellend shows off your vastly superior vocabulary and is also very welcoming for the new members. I shall bear it in mind for my future posts. I appreciate you taking me under your wing like this. Any further advice is welcomedNatasha Whittam wrote:Bwfc1958 wrote:
Sometimes it just seems appropriate. Dougie Frreedman, David Cameron, Russell Brand, Bruce Forsyth. I could go on.......
There are plenty of other words that won't offend people and put off potential new members. Don't you think I deserve a bigger audience?
36 Re: For the love of God......No! Wed Dec 17, 2014 6:47 pm
Natasha Whittam
Nat Lofthouse
KP was the one on his knees.
37 Re: For the love of God......No! Wed Dec 17, 2014 6:49 pm
Guest
Guest
Is that why he now walks with a gimp limp?
40 Re: For the love of God......No! Wed Dec 17, 2014 7:07 pm
Guest
Guest
Just checking ways around it. Thanks
Go to page : 1, 2, 3, 4
Similar topics
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum