T.u.g.b.o.a.t
For the love of God......No!
+3
Bwfc1958
Hipster_Nebula
Natasha Whittam
7 posters
Go to page : 1, 2, 3, 4
42 Re: For the love of God......No! Wed Dec 17 2014, 19:10
Natasha Whittam
Nat Lofthouse
I've received 23 PMs supporting my stance on bad language.
43 Re: For the love of God......No! Wed Dec 17 2014, 19:13
Guest
Guest
23 people who need to take the internet less fucking seriously.....kuntz
44 Re: For the love of God......No! Wed Dec 17 2014, 19:15
Natasha Whittam
Nat Lofthouse
y2johnny wrote:23 people who need to take the internet less fucking seriously.....kuntz
You come on the internet to swear?
45 Re: For the love of God......No! Wed Dec 17 2014, 19:15
Guest
Guest
Natasha Whittam wrote:I've received 23 PMs supporting my stance on bad language.
I heard it was 23 MP's that you "received"......
After a swanky function at Westminster.
And they all left happy.
Just saying......
Last edited by Breadman on Wed Dec 17 2014, 19:16; edited 1 time in total
46 Re: For the love of God......No! Wed Dec 17 2014, 19:15
Natasha Whittam
Nat Lofthouse
You seem obsessed by my sex life you tugboat.
47 Re: For the love of God......No! Wed Dec 17 2014, 19:17
Guest
Guest
No mention of sex in my last post.
It's all in your head, love.
It's all in your head, love.
48 Re: For the love of God......No! Wed Dec 17 2014, 19:19
Guest
Guest
No. I come on to let off steam, have a laugh and as an escape from everyday life.
Like you come on to be an online tranny
Like you come on to be an online tranny
49 Re: For the love of God......No! Wed Dec 17 2014, 19:22
Natasha Whittam
Nat Lofthouse
y2johnny wrote:No. I come on to let off steam, have a laugh and as an escape from everyday life.
So other people have to read your foul language just because you're trying to escape from reality?
I've heard a rumour that Nuts is going to sponsor Liam Trotter's y-fronts from next season - imagine the traffic that is heading our way because of that deal, do we want to put people off by using the c-word?
50 Re: For the love of God......No! Wed Dec 17 2014, 19:24
Guest
Guest
That'll be the only nuts in or on them y fronts sponsoring that soft lad
51 Re: For the love of God......No! Wed Dec 17 2014, 19:25
Natasha Whittam
Nat Lofthouse
y2johnny wrote:That'll be the only nuts in or on them y fronts sponsoring that soft lad
Don't insult our future figurehead.
52 Re: For the love of God......No! Wed Dec 17 2014, 19:28
Guest
Guest
If thats the dizzy heights you are aiming to achieve. May be better asking bonce if we can sponsor brucies incontinence underwear. Probably more fitting
53 Re: For the love of God......No! Thu Dec 18 2014, 17:58
Keegan
Admin
Jeb Bush is a Koontz and should not be allowed to even visit the White House, let alone campaign to live there.
55 Re: For the love of God......No! Thu Dec 18 2014, 19:12
Guest
Guest
Who switched the sweat filter off
56 Re: For the love of God......No! Thu Dec 18 2014, 19:47
Guest
Guest
I think you'd like this site, Johnny:
http://cuntscorner.com/index.php?/forum/42-the-corner/
I actually managed to get myself banned from it.
(True story.)
http://cuntscorner.com/index.php?/forum/42-the-corner/
I actually managed to get myself banned from it.
(True story.)
57 Re: For the love of God......No! Thu Dec 18 2014, 19:52
Guest
Guest
Ai think the mods need to look at this site and learn from it. Its fucking brilliant
58 Re: For the love of God......No! Thu Dec 18 2014, 19:56
Guest
Guest
It's ok but every thread tends to eventually devolve into a monumental slanging match.
I got fed up with it and started a thread nominating all the mods and everybody on the site.
And they banned me.
Tugboats!
I got fed up with it and started a thread nominating all the mods and everybody on the site.
And they banned me.
Tugboats!
59 Re: For the love of God......No! Thu Dec 18 2014, 19:59
Guest
Guest
Seems like an anything goes site.
60 Re: For the love of God......No! Thu Dec 18 2014, 20:03
Guest
Guest
Apparently not......
The Richard Bacon thread was a cracker.
It went on for weeks but I (honestly) think that "his people" intervened eventually because it spread like wildfire all across social media and then disappeared overnight.
It turns out that everybody in the world apart from his kid hates Richard Bacon.
And his kid's only a baby so when it grows up it'll probably come to the same conclusion about its Dad as the rest of us.
The Richard Bacon thread was a cracker.
It went on for weeks but I (honestly) think that "his people" intervened eventually because it spread like wildfire all across social media and then disappeared overnight.
It turns out that everybody in the world apart from his kid hates Richard Bacon.
And his kid's only a baby so when it grows up it'll probably come to the same conclusion about its Dad as the rest of us.
Go to page : 1, 2, 3, 4
Similar topics
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum