HomeBack on thread - a nonsense decision from an arrogant clown- and it's not the first by a long way. Clattenburg needs to be suspended and sent for retraining as his decisions are affwcting the outcomes of games an therefore of league positions and the economic outcomes for clubs. One bad decision (like this one) can cost club millions in future revenues
Mark Clattenburg
+10
rammywhite
Bwfc1958
Sluffy
scottjames30
karlypants
Natasha Whittam
Norpig
Reebok Trotter
boltonbonce
doffcocker
14 posters
Go to page : 
1, 2, 3, 4
Message [Page 4 of 4]
62 Re: Mark Clattenburg Mon Feb 15 2016, 10:56
Natasha Whittam
Nat Lofthouse
rammywhite wrote:Back on thread - a nonsense decision from an arrogant clown- and it's not the first by a long way. Clattenburg needs to be suspended and sent for retraining as his decisions are affwcting the outcomes of games an therefore of league positions and the economic outcomes for clubs. One bad decision (like this one) can cost club millions in future revenues
Total over reaction. It was one bad decision. You'll never find a human ref who gets everything 100% spot on.
Get a grip.
63 Re: Mark Clattenburg Mon Feb 15 2016, 11:20
rammywhite
Frank Worthington
Natasha Whittam wrote:rammywhite wrote:Back on thread - a nonsense decision from an arrogant clown- and it's not the first by a long way. Clattenburg needs to be suspended and sent for retraining as his decisions are affwcting the outcomes of games an therefore of league positions and the economic outcomes for clubs. One bad decision (like this one) can cost club millions in future revenues
Total over reaction. It was one bad decision. You'll never find a human ref who gets everything 100% spot on.
Get a grip.
It's not ONE bad decision- it's one more in a series of bad decisions from this guy who thinks he's the main attraction.
64 Re: Mark Clattenburg Mon Feb 15 2016, 11:22
Natasha Whittam
Nat Lofthouse
rammywhite wrote:
It's not ONE bad decision- it's one more in a series of bad decisions from this guy who thinks he's the main attraction.
I'd like to see you do better.
65 Re: Mark Clattenburg Mon Feb 15 2016, 11:26
rammywhite
Frank Worthington
But unfortunately you won't as I'm not paid to be a full time,well paid professional referee. The day of the amateur referee is long gone. These guys are paid to get all the big decisions correct.Natasha Whittam wrote:rammywhite wrote:
It's not ONE bad decision- it's one more in a series of bad decisions from this guy who thinks he's the main attraction.
I'd like to see you do better.
I'm very well paid to do a different job- and I don't make catastrophic errors like this one- otherwise I'd be demoted or shown the door
66 Re: Mark Clattenburg Mon Feb 15 2016, 11:32
Reebok Trotter
Nat Lofthouse
Premier League refs are on about £5,000 per game and as Rammy says, it's not the first time Clatters has dropped a clanger.
67 Re: Mark Clattenburg Mon Feb 15 2016, 11:53
Natasha Whittam
Nat Lofthouse
All referees make mistakes, even the best in the world.
The game is so fast, it's easy to point the finger when you've watched it ten times in slow motion.
The game is so fast, it's easy to point the finger when you've watched it ten times in slow motion.
68 Re: Mark Clattenburg Mon Feb 15 2016, 12:10
Guest
Guest
Natasha Whittam wrote:All referees make mistakes, even the best in the world.
The game is so fast, it's easy to point the finger when you've watched it ten times in slow motion.
I would wager that pretty much everybody watching that game yesterday immediately went: "How's that a penalty? He had his back to the ball when it hit him!" as soon as the whistle went, signalling the penalty.
Stop being an arse.
PM Pete and see if he'll let you have BEL back if it'll make you feel better and stop all this nonsense.
69 Re: Mark Clattenburg Mon Feb 15 2016, 12:16
Natasha Whittam
Nat Lofthouse
Breadman wrote:
I would wager that pretty much everybody watching that game yesterday immediately went: "How's that a penalty? He had his back to the ball when it hit him!" as soon as the whistle went, signalling the penalty.
Stop being an arse.
PM Pete and see if he'll let you have BEL back if it'll make you feel better and stop all this nonsense.
Yes, because the view you see from the TV is exactly like the view the ref gets
.Football is a fast game, for players and referees. Be honest Breadman, when was the last time you played in a proper game of football? Around the last time you saw your toes perhaps?
70 Re: Mark Clattenburg Mon Feb 15 2016, 12:17
Boggersbelief
Nat Lofthouse
Breadman wrote:Natasha Whittam wrote:All referees make mistakes, even the best in the world.
The game is so fast, it's easy to point the finger when you've watched it ten times in slow motion.
Stop being an arse.
Practice what you preach.
72 Re: Mark Clattenburg Mon Feb 15 2016, 13:55
Guest
Guest
I fail to see how the ref being closer to the action or having a different view of the incident to the one offered by the camera means that he could have missed the fact that Sterling had his back to the ball when it hit him.
Please enlighten me.
Please enlighten me.
73 Re: Mark Clattenburg Sat May 21 2016, 17:56
doffcocker
Ivan Campo
Another howler by Clattenburg.
Palace player through on goal, easiest advantage decision a ref should ever have to make, blows for a free kick.
What a fucking liability this bloke really is.
Palace player through on goal, easiest advantage decision a ref should ever have to make, blows for a free kick.
What a fucking liability this bloke really is.
74 Re: Mark Clattenburg Sat May 21 2016, 17:57
boltonbonce
Nat Lofthouse
doffcocker wrote:Another howler by Clattenburg.
Palace player through on goal, easiest advantage decision a ref should ever have to make, blows for a free kick.
What a fucking liability this bloke really is.
75 Re: Mark Clattenburg Sat May 21 2016, 18:20
okocha
El Hadji Diouf
How was Clattenburg ever rated a top referee?! He gets so many big decisions wrong, and is way too chummy with the star players.
76 Re: Mark Clattenburg Sat May 21 2016, 19:33
luckyPeterpiper
Ivan Campo
For once I agree with you. What strikes me as utterly ridiculous is that the FA and FIFA are still refusing to even consider using video replay technology for certain decisions. I've heard the argument about breaking the "flow" of the game but frankly it doesn't wash with me. If there's a dispute about whether or not something is a penalty the fourth official should be able to look at the replay and tell the ref "Yes" or "no". Same with offside and certain other situations.Natasha Whittam wrote:All referees make mistakes, even the best in the world.
The game is so fast, it's easy to point the finger when you've watched it ten times in slow motion.
Frankly there's no way a human being can get every call right and given how costly mistakes can be to the clubs affected I believe it's high time FIFA got into the 21st Century and used the technology that's already there at pretty much every professional club on earth now.
77 Re: Mark Clattenburg Sat May 21 2016, 20:16
okocha
El Hadji Diouf
Yes, but we're talking here about not blowing up immediately when a foul is committed , but waiting a second or two to see if advantage arises. Clats got it wrong 3 times in just a few minutes!
And he has a huge catalogue of incorrect decisions to his name. Check out his history on the web. He is not fit to referee big games.
There is also a history of very pally behaviour with stars that he seems to want to ingratiate himself with......
And he has a huge catalogue of incorrect decisions to his name. Check out his history on the web. He is not fit to referee big games.
There is also a history of very pally behaviour with stars that he seems to want to ingratiate himself with......
78 Re: Mark Clattenburg Sun May 22 2016, 11:04
Natasha Whittam
Nat Lofthouse
okocha wrote:Yes, but we're talking here about not blowing up immediately when a foul is committed , but waiting a second or two to see if advantage arises. Clats got it wrong 3 times in just a few minutes!
And he has a huge catalogue of incorrect decisions to his name. Check out his history on the web. He is not fit to referee big games.
There is also a history of very pally behaviour with stars that he seems to want to ingratiate himself with......
He had a bad game yesterday, no doubt about that. But he also gave the best refereeing display of the season when Spurs played Chelsea a couple of weeks ago.
I don't see how him being "pally" with the players is a bad thing, they move in the same circles so it's inevitable that they're going to be friends.
79 Re: Mark Clattenburg Sun May 22 2016, 14:39
wanderlust
Nat Lofthouse
I think Clattenburg is as fallible as anyone and although I resist trying to interpret what's behind his thinking, he does seem to have "celebrity attitude" which impacts on his decision-making IMO.Natasha Whittam wrote:okocha wrote:Yes, but we're talking here about not blowing up immediately when a foul is committed , but waiting a second or two to see if advantage arises. Clats got it wrong 3 times in just a few minutes!
And he has a huge catalogue of incorrect decisions to his name. Check out his history on the web. He is not fit to referee big games.
There is also a history of very pally behaviour with stars that he seems to want to ingratiate himself with......
He had a bad game yesterday, no doubt about that. But he also gave the best refereeing display of the season when Spurs played Chelsea a couple of weeks ago.
I don't see how him being "pally" with the players is a bad thing, they move in the same circles so it's inevitable that they're going to be friends.
What I find incongruous is that he is so highly rated by the authorities and other referees. He's been given loads of prestigious games and they love him. This article by Mark Halsey says Clattenburg is the best referee in the world. Can't see it personally and I think Palace have a grievance after yesterday's performance.
80 Re: Mark Clattenburg Sun May 22 2016, 21:20
Reebok Trotter
Nat Lofthouse
doffcocker wrote:Another howler by Clattenburg.
Palace player through on goal, easiest advantage decision a ref should ever have to make, blows for a free kick.
What a fucking liability this bloke really is.
Twice as well! You had to feel for Palace in the first half. Am I right in thinking that Clattenburg is refereeing the Champions League final as well?
Message [Page 4 of 4]
Go to page : 1, 2, 3, 4
Similar topics
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
|
|
|