Brexit - A new twist!

xmiles wrote:
Just because people vote for something doesn't make it right.

This isn't about right or wrong, it's about the rules.

We had a referendum, the public voted, and now we should all move on.

Whinging about something every day won't stop it happening.

bwfc1874 wrote:Awful example, are you saying that you've never broken up with somebody and then stated them afterwards? We all remember Mavies and Nuggy. 

And that's the point why can't anybody express an opinion without being told to shut up? It's absolutely pathetic.

Ok, try this one.

Every day of your life your girlfriend complains about the (small) size of your knob. Every single day to anyone that will listen.

It's her right to express that opinion, but won't you tire of hearing it? Your penis is small, you get it.

Still some way off, try this - 

Your boyfriend hacks off half his penis because a couple of TV personality politicians had been telling people that if they did so their lives would be infinitely more prosperous and the only thing that had been holding them back from this fantastic life was that half of their penis.

He keeps protesting how good a thing it was to do, would you stop trying to tell him why you think it isn't less than 6 months after?

Natasha Whittam wrote:

xmiles wrote:
Just because people vote for something doesn't make it right.

This isn't about right or wrong, it's about the rules.

We had a referendum, the public voted, and now we should all move on.

Whinging about something every day won't stop it happening.

Unfortunately it would appear your hero Call Me Dave failed to clarify the rules properly!?

Natasha Whittam wrote:

bwfc1874 wrote:Awful example, are you saying that you've never broken up with somebody and then stated them afterwards? We all remember Mavies and Nuggy. 

And that's the point why can't anybody express an opinion without being told to shut up? It's absolutely patheour knob. Every single day to anyone that will listen.

 Your penis is small, you get it.

It's not the size of the nail that matters, it's the hammer that bangs it in!! Thought you'd know that?

Natasha Whittam wrote:

xmiles wrote:
Just because people vote for something doesn't make it right.

This isn't about right or wrong, it's about the rules.

The Court case is about the rules as we will see on 5 December.

Just for the record i agree with the three Musketeers. It is the rule of law end of.

The fact that Cameron didn't realise that he didn't have the power to offer to leave, says more about this government than anything else.  The MP's will agree with the referendum decision it is political suicide do do anything else, so just get it done then we can all suffer in piece. 

16 million got it right 17 million got it wrong so be it.

Supreme Court slaps May down ruling that Parliament should vote on what kind of Brexit we are going to get:

• The Supreme Court has ruled that the government cannot begin the formal process of leaving the European Union without a vote in Parliament. 
  
  
• Ministers had appealed against an earlier High Court decision, arguing that they already had the authority to trigger Article 50. The businesswoman Gina Millar - who led the legal challenge against the government - said the ruling meant that MPs would rightfully have a say on Brexit. 
  
  
• The government has promised draft legislation within days and Brexit Secretary David Davis spent the best part of two hours being quizzed by 84 MPs about the proposals.
  
  
• He said today's ruling would not derail the government's plans to trigger Article 50 before the end of March. And he was forced to bat away umpteen requests from all sides to publish a white paper giving further details on its plans.
  
  
• Labour has said it won't frustrate the process - but wants MPs to vote on the deal the government agrees with the EU - before it is signed off.
  
  
• But the party's former home secretary David Blunkett warned the Lords not to end up in a head-to-head confrontation with the British public by trying to block the Article 50 bill
  
  
• Meanwhile, Scotland's First Minister, Nicola Sturgeon, has said she is "disappointed" that the Supreme Court ruled that ministers do not need to consult the devolved administrations before triggering Article 50.
  
  
• Ms Sturgeon said it showed the devolution settlement was "not worth the paper it was written on". The Welsh government said it welcomed today's judgement - adding it was vital that Theresa May reflected the interests of Wales in her Brexit negotiations.
  
  

My view is that the Government will continue to argue that they cannot release details for Parliament to vote on as it may impact on the negotiations - but they now may have to.
I don't think they'll go for a straight "Article 50 yes or no" question unless Jezza promises to go for the party whip as they know they'll lose so it's going to be fun and games and how this will pan out is a mystery to me.

Oh dear.....

http://news.sky.com/story/it-will-take-years-for-brits-to-fill-low-skilled-eu-migrant-jobs-says-brexit-secretary-10777345

Now far be it from me to be a smug bastard, but I did say this nearly a year ago when I predicted that a Leave vote would mean an eventual hike in the price of loaves of bread and tins of beans.

And it sort of begs the question: If we're still going to let low-skilled workers come in from Europe, what was the fucking point of it all?

Interested to hear the thoughts of anyone who voted Leave because they wanted to "take back control of our borders".

Thanks.

Don't hold your breath Bread.

it will take more than a few years as the jobless scrotes in this country who see being on the dole as a privilege will think doing these types of jobs are beneath them and will find a way to carry on skiving

Bread2.0 wrote:Now far be it from me to be a smug bastard, but I did say this nearly a year ago when I predicted that a Leave vote would mean an eventual hike in the price of loaves of bread and tins of beans.

I don't like beans.

Natasha Whittam wrote:

Bread2.0 wrote:Now far be it from me to be a smug bastard, but I did say this nearly a year ago when I predicted that a Leave vote would mean an eventual hike in the price of loaves of bread and tins of beans.

I don't like beans.

Very wise.

We can't have it spouting from both ends.

boltonbonce wrote:Very wise.

We can't have it spouting from both ends.

Natasha Whittam wrote:

Bread2.0 wrote:Now far be it from me to be a smug bastard, but I did say this nearly a year ago when I predicted that a Leave vote would mean an eventual hike in the price of loaves of bread and tins of beans.

I don't like beans.

Don't knock it - beans are set to be our new currency.

Bread's boat dream is more important though.

Natasha Whittam wrote:Bread's boat dream is more important though.

Sadly the place we've just bought in Spain doesn't have room for a boat on the drive and the nearest marina charges £100 a month to berth a boat so the boat dream's (temporarily) dead.

I am a bit gutted if I'm honest.

I could do with a week away. Will Mrs B mind?