Bolton Wanderers Fans Forum

You are not connected. Please login or register

Bolton Nuts » BWFC » Bolton Wanderers Banter » Chesterfield 1-0 Bolton - Match Report Post #24

Chesterfield 1-0 Bolton - Match Report Post #24

Go to page : Previous  1, 2

View previous topic View next topic Go down  Message [Page 2 of 2]

Natasha Whittam

avatar
Nat Lofthouse
Nat Lofthouse
He's done ok, but he's off in a month or two. Would make more sense to pick the players we own.

Derek is a better player.

Boggersbelief

avatar
Nat Lofthouse
Nat Lofthouse
How do you know there isn't a deal to extend the loan?

Norpig

avatar
John McGinlay
John McGinlay
it was a poor performance but we had to lose sometime and as long as they get back to winning ways on Boxing Day it won't cause too much damage.
Facebook is full of doom merchants because we lost one game, lots of massive overreactions, it's just a blip.

Natasha Whittam

avatar
Nat Lofthouse
Nat Lofthouse
Boggersbelief wrote:How do you know there isn't a deal to extend the loan?

He'll still be on loan. All we're doing is putting him in the shop window, it won't benefit us.



Boggersbelief

avatar
Nat Lofthouse
Nat Lofthouse
Natasha Whittam wrote:
Boggersbelief wrote:How do you know there isn't a deal to extend the loan?

He'll still be on loan. All we're doing is putting him in the shop window, it won't benefit us.




Loans are usually extended with the option of making it permanent

Boggersbelief

avatar
Nat Lofthouse
Nat Lofthouse
Norpig wrote:it was a poor performance but we had to lose sometime and as long as they get back to winning ways on Boxing Day it won't cause too much damage.
Facebook is full of doom merchants because we lost one game, lots of massive overreactions, it's just a blip.

Bollocks, I said a few days ago we still look mentally weak away from home, might be our undoing

whatsgoingon

avatar
Frank Worthington
Frank Worthington
T
Natasha Whittam wrote:I don't understand why he picks Thorpe ahead of Derek.

Thorpe will be back off to Rotherham at some point, surely it's better to pick a player we own especially when he's been superb this season.
I think Thorpe is hear for the season and then out of contract, Anderson referred to one that was a transfer turned into a loan because of the embargo.
I think that was the Thorpe one

Natasha Whittam

avatar
Nat Lofthouse
Nat Lofthouse
I just think Derek is a better passer, and when you don't create/score many goals his one killer pass per game could change things.

Boggersbelief

avatar
Nat Lofthouse
Nat Lofthouse
Natasha Whittam wrote:I just think Derek is a better passer, and when you don't create/score many goals his one killer pass per game could change things.

That we agree on, DERIK is the better player but you don't change a winning side

whatsgoingon

avatar
Frank Worthington
Frank Worthington
Boggersbelief wrote:
Natasha Whittam wrote:I just think Derek is a better passer, and when you don't create/score many goals his one killer pass per game could change things.

That we agree on, DERIK is the better player but you don't change a winning side
I also think Derik is a better all round player and we also won when he was in the side

Natasha Whittam

avatar
Nat Lofthouse
Nat Lofthouse
Boggersbelief wrote:That we agree on, DERIK is the better player but you don't change a winning side

I only do it because I know it bugs you Very Happy

Boggersbelief

avatar
Nat Lofthouse
Nat Lofthouse
Cute

terenceanne

avatar
El Hadji Diouf
El Hadji Diouf
Can't win 'em all .....but why do we lose to bottom feeders like this.....just what is the point of a double change in the 85th minute.
Chalk this one off then.

MartinBWFC

avatar
El Hadji Diouf
El Hadji Diouf
Seeing the highlights, Zach Clough doesn't half miss a lot of 1 on 1s, he's missed a load this season.

Boggersbelief

avatar
Nat Lofthouse
Nat Lofthouse
terenceanne wrote:Can't win 'em all .....but why do we lose to bottom feeders like this.....just what is the point of a double change in the 85th minute.
Chalk this one off then.

They had 11 men behind the the ball as soon as they scored, we didn't have anyone good enough to break them down

whatsgoingon

avatar
Frank Worthington
Frank Worthington
MartinBWFC wrote:Seeing the highlights, Zach Clough doesn't half miss a lot of 1 on 1s, he's missed a load this season.
I agree he missed a relatively easy one vs Gillingham too, hopefully it's something he can work on in training

wanderlust

avatar
Nat Lofthouse
Nat Lofthouse
Bread2.0 wrote:
whatsgoingon wrote:
wanderlust wrote:The thing that worries me about this one is complacency because Chesterfield are fighting for survival and our lads are doing well. Providing they are up for it we should win comfortably but they should be in no doubt that Chesterfield will have a proper go.
I don't think PP leaves any room for complacency and the work ethic seems to be there whoever we play, Peterborough aside we have maintained a level of performance.
I'm going 2-0

I love the comment in the Gary Madine article where he says that after coming off after one game with cries of "Fuck off, Madine!" still ringing in his ears, Parky basically pulled him and said "Listen, this lot think you're shit. You can sulk about it or prove them wrong. What's it gonna be?"

No mollycoddling from our Phil it would appear.

And it looks like it's working.
Still think it was complacency that cost us the game.

Boggersbelief

avatar
Nat Lofthouse
Nat Lofthouse
wanderlust wrote:
Bread2.0 wrote:
whatsgoingon wrote:
wanderlust wrote:The thing that worries me about this one is complacency because Chesterfield are fighting for survival and our lads are doing well. Providing they are up for it we should win comfortably but they should be in no doubt that Chesterfield will have a proper go.
I don't think PP leaves any room for complacency and the work ethic seems to be there whoever we play, Peterborough aside we have maintained a level of performance.
I'm going 2-0

I love the comment in the Gary Madine article where he says that after coming off after one game with cries of "Fuck off, Madine!" still ringing in his ears, Parky basically pulled him and said "Listen, this lot think you're shit. You can sulk about it or prove them wrong. What's it gonna be?"

No mollycoddling from our Phil it would appear.

And it looks like it's working.
Still think it was complacency that cost us the game.

You were at the game then?

Natasha Whittam

avatar
Nat Lofthouse
Nat Lofthouse
Boggers, you forget I can see you on the site even though you hide yourself (never understood why someone does that??)

You were on here throughout the game yesterday. I don't think you were in Chesterfield.

Boggersbelief

avatar
Nat Lofthouse
Nat Lofthouse
Natasha Whittam wrote:Boggers, you forget I can see you on the site even though you hide yourself (never understood why someone does that??)

You were on here throughout the game yesterday. I don't think you were in Chesterfield.

I'm always online as I don't log out.. why would anyone log on and off every time they visit forum?

But thanks for confirming that you also didn't go, join wandy and bread on the sofa

Bread2.0

avatar
Andy Walker
Andy Walker
Boggersbelief wrote:


I'm always online as I don't have any friends because I smell funny.

Fixed that for you.

:good:

Boggersbelief

avatar
Nat Lofthouse
Nat Lofthouse
Bread2.0 wrote:
Boggersbelief wrote:


I'm always online as I don't have any friends because I smell funny.

Fixed that for you.

:good:

Didn't your oringial account, you know, the one you used before you had a paddy and deleted it, have more posts than mine?

Bread2.0

avatar
Andy Walker
Andy Walker
Yes, and every single one of them was worth reading.

Unlike your output.

Boggersbelief

avatar
Nat Lofthouse
Nat Lofthouse
Bread2.0 wrote:Yes, and every single one of them was worth reading.

Unlike your output.

There is a simple solution, don't respond

Natasha Whittam

avatar
Nat Lofthouse
Nat Lofthouse
Boggersbelief wrote:

I'm always online as I don't log out.. why would anyone log on and off every time they visit forum?

But thanks for confirming that you also didn't go, join wandy and bread on the sofa

If you're inactive for an hour it removes you from the registered users online, yet you were there the whole game.

So either you went to the game and spent the whole 90 minutes reading Nuts, or you're lying.

I didn't go, I have much better things to do than waste a whole Saturday watching Bolton.

MartinBWFC

avatar
El Hadji Diouf
El Hadji Diouf
Natasha Whittam wrote:

I didn't go, I live  for Saturday Afternoons watching Bolton Nuts
Sad, very sad

Boggersbelief

avatar
Nat Lofthouse
Nat Lofthouse
Natasha Whittam wrote:
Boggersbelief wrote:

I'm always online as I don't log out.. why would anyone log on and off every time they visit forum?

But thanks for confirming that you also didn't go, join wandy and bread on the sofa

If you're inactive for an hour it removes you from the registered users online, yet you were there the whole game.

So either you went to the game and spent the whole 90 minutes reading Nuts, or you're lying.

I didn't go, I have much better things to do than waste a whole Saturday watching Bolton.

No it doesn't, It only removes you if you log off .  I actually go to games, thanks

wanderlust

avatar
Nat Lofthouse
Nat Lofthouse
Boggersbelief wrote:
Natasha Whittam wrote:
Boggersbelief wrote:

I'm always online as I don't log out.. why would anyone log on and off every time they visit forum?

But thanks for confirming that you also didn't go, join wandy and bread on the sofa

If you're inactive for an hour it removes you from the registered users online, yet you were there the whole game.

So either you went to the game and spent the whole 90 minutes reading Nuts, or you're lying.

I didn't go, I have much better things to do than waste a whole Saturday watching Bolton.

No it doesn't, It only removes you if you log off .  I actually go to games, thanks
As do I when I can. I just don't make a big song and dance about it.

Boggersbelief

avatar
Nat Lofthouse
Nat Lofthouse
wanderlust wrote:
Boggersbelief wrote:
Natasha Whittam wrote:
Boggersbelief wrote:

I'm always online as I don't log out.. why would anyone log on and off every time they visit forum?

But thanks for confirming that you also didn't go, join wandy and bread on the sofa

If you're inactive for an hour it removes you from the registered users online, yet you were there the whole game.

So either you went to the game and spent the whole 90 minutes reading Nuts, or you're lying.

I didn't go, I have much better things to do than waste a whole Saturday watching Bolton.

No it doesn't, It only removes you if you log off .  I actually go to games, thanks
As do I when I can. I just don't make a big song and dance about it.

Nope, you just give expert analysis on a game you didn't see

View previous topic View next topic Back to top  Message [Page 2 of 2]

Go to page : Previous  1, 2

Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum