Chesterfield 1-0 Bolton - Match Report Post #24

Boggersbelief wrote:How do you know there isn't a deal to extend the loan?

Natasha Whittam wrote:

Boggersbelief wrote:How do you know there isn't a deal to extend the loan?

He'll still be on loan. All we're doing is putting him in the shop window, it won't benefit us.

Norpig wrote:it was a poor performance but we had to lose sometime and as long as they get back to winning ways on Boxing Day it won't cause too much damage.
Facebook is full of doom merchants because we lost one game, lots of massive overreactions, it's just a blip.

Natasha Whittam wrote:I don't understand why he picks Thorpe ahead of Derek.

Thorpe will be back off to Rotherham at some point, surely it's better to pick a player we own especially when he's been superb this season.

Natasha Whittam wrote:I just think Derek is a better passer, and when you don't create/score many goals his one killer pass per game could change things.

Boggersbelief wrote:

Natasha Whittam wrote:I just think Derek is a better passer, and when you don't create/score many goals his one killer pass per game could change things.

That we agree on, DERIK is the better player but you don't change a winning side

Boggersbelief wrote:That we agree on, DERIK is the better player but you don't change a winning side

terenceanne wrote:Can't win 'em all .....but why do we lose to bottom feeders like this.....just what is the point of a double change in the 85th minute.
Chalk this one off then.

MartinBWFC wrote:Seeing the highlights, Zach Clough doesn't half miss a lot of 1 on 1s, he's missed a load this season.

Bread2.0 wrote:

whatsgoingon wrote:

wanderlust wrote:The thing that worries me about this one is complacency because Chesterfield are fighting for survival and our lads are doing well. Providing they are up for it we should win comfortably but they should be in no doubt that Chesterfield will have a proper go.

I don't think PP leaves any room for complacency and the work ethic seems to be there whoever we play, Peterborough aside we have maintained a level of performance.
I'm going 2-0

I love the comment in the Gary Madine article where he says that after coming off after one game with cries of "Fuck off, Madine!" still ringing in his ears, Parky basically pulled him and said "Listen, this lot think you're shit. You can sulk about it or prove them wrong. What's it gonna be?"

No mollycoddling from our Phil it would appear.

And it looks like it's working.

wanderlust wrote:

Bread2.0 wrote:

whatsgoingon wrote:

wanderlust wrote:The thing that worries me about this one is complacency because Chesterfield are fighting for survival and our lads are doing well. Providing they are up for it we should win comfortably but they should be in no doubt that Chesterfield will have a proper go.

I don't think PP leaves any room for complacency and the work ethic seems to be there whoever we play, Peterborough aside we have maintained a level of performance.
I'm going 2-0

I love the comment in the Gary Madine article where he says that after coming off after one game with cries of "Fuck off, Madine!" still ringing in his ears, Parky basically pulled him and said "Listen, this lot think you're shit. You can sulk about it or prove them wrong. What's it gonna be?"

No mollycoddling from our Phil it would appear.

And it looks like it's working.

Still think it was complacency that cost us the game.

Natasha Whittam wrote:Boggers, you forget I can see you on the site even though you hide yourself (never understood why someone does that??)

You were on here throughout the game yesterday. I don't think you were in Chesterfield.