Home
bwfc1874 wrote:White84 wrote:Wasn't she already getting done by some other footballer,when Ched Evans got the key to the room.
1958 said Mike Tyson should of not been allowed to box again.( sort your head out mate) I spoke to Tyson in 2000 before he fought Julia's Francis at the MEN Arena.He was stitched up the judge didn't allow certain material submitted by the prosecution that Desiree Washington was all over Tyson.
You don't go to a mans room to tickle each other.
The American justice system is biased against the black man.I found Tyson to be a decent bloke.
He was used and it was a shame his millions went west.
I watched a documentary that showed jurors saying if they had seen certain documents,evidence they would of found Tyson not guilty.
Ched Evans was a fool and the fact that 20-000 on line signatures in Oldham when they get 6-000 on a good match watching smells of a witch hunt.
Lee Hughes killed two people,although Rape is a terrible crime,the girl was already doing Clayton Donaldson when Evans let himself in.
The thing is with jury's if they take a dislike to you,you are finished.It can be a lottery.A case in America where the jury was hung on Manslaughter or Murder 2 they tossed a coin becuase they wanted to get home.On hearing this the judge declared a mistrial.
What greater chance to get a free kick this Footballer down to Earth,you can imagine the jury the Women ( thinks he can do what he wants) blokes loads of cash thinks he's bad cos he's a footballer on money we can only dream of.)She was getting it off Donaldson,the night porter said he went to the room and could here people having sex.
Sounds like a case of the beers wore off I've been used abused and my boyfriends gonna want to know where I've been.Why should someone show remorse if actually they were acting under consent of someone pissed as a fart.
He's been a fool and not very gentlemanly,he's behaved abohorantley.But Lee Hughes killed two people.
He was welcomed back and is still playing today I think.
The problem with people like you is that you don't bother looking at any of the facts behind the case to base your opinion on. You hear a story, make somethig up in your mind and then plough ahead on an opinion which is usually extreme. If you could back anything you say (on any topic) with facts people might take you seriously. But you're too dim to read around a subject and get an informed opinion.
Take a look at the facts of the case so you can either back up what you've said here or completely re-write it.
You may not agree with anything he says but you seem to insult him at every given chance, which makes you look like a tit tbh.
Just a bit of helpful advice, you stay classy
