75 posts off making the elite.

74 is now below me (for now as i will be taking a break to walk back to the hotel and go and get some scran so he may overtake me again!)

Next up













KEEGAN

Scott's made over 10,000 posts yet he's still the forum joke (as well as holding the same title on BA).

All about quality, not quantity.

bwfc1874 wrote:

All about quality, not quantity.

I produce both.

Natasha Whittam wrote:

bwfc1874 wrote:

All about quality, not quantity.

I have both genitalia.

bwfc1874 wrote:Scott's made over 10,000 posts yet he's still the forum joke (as well as holding the same title on BA).

All about quality, not quantity.

Have you got me on the brain or something, you must think that everyone loves reading your posts.

I've told you before ' rock head' i am not taking you on.

Go and bore the living shit out of somebody else 

Sorry Scott,  I was just making the point to Johnny that quality of posts is more important than quantity. 

I had a look at the overall top 10 and the rest are all really good posters so I was forced to use you as an example.

Lets see if he can start a thread beating my page count, he fucked up last time.

Hes all gob, offers this forum nothing at all.

Come on then big balls, start a thread.

Just about the geekiest challenge I've ever been offered.

What's starting a thread got to do with anything? Why would I do it? I'm talking about your 10,000 contributions to threads over 2 years. Don't know why you're getting so wound up about it, just my opinion.

Good god you really are a knob 

Bye.

Bye!

Who has left this time?

Natasha Whittam wrote:Whose left this time?

Who's, not "whose".

As you were......

Scott apparently, don't think he's going anywhere though. He worked too hard to get back on here.

Stop trying to be clever or funny, some posters are really good at it, but you make yourself look a right knob,thats because you're shit at being funny or clever, stop trying to make a name for yourself, trying to show off.

It makes everyone cringe, some great advice right there for you.

Natasha Whittam wrote:Whose left this time?

Can't believe the chuckle brothers have lasted longer than a few hours.

Breadman wrote:

Who's, not "whose".

As you were......

Thank you.

Is it the 1st already?

Good to have you back.

Boggersbelief wrote:

Natasha Whittam wrote:Whose left this time?

Can't believe the chuckle brothers have lasted longer than a few hours.

In fairness, Scott just managed 10 minutes then. 

Deserves a bit of credit for that.

Welcome to the lunatic asylum! 

I think Breadman is sometimes funny, good for a war, but has 1874 ever made anyone laugh?

Even once.