Transfer rumours !

Boggersbelief wrote:We can't afford 4k a week wages according nixon. Now that is scary

Been saying that for months.

You lot should revere me more and accept that I'm seldom wrong about this type of thing.

Just saying......

Don't you always say how nixon is a compulsive bullshitter though?

Boggersbelief wrote:Don't you always say how nixon is a compulsive bullshitter though?

Yes but that doesn't mean he's wrong about this.

Boggersbelief wrote:Lennon set to resign. He's given up after Gartside turned down his 4 k a week striker

That could open the door for big Sam.

WUM

Nixon has a reasonable record when it comes to rumour mongering, but who was this £4k a week striker?
I didn't think you could get strikers for that kind of money.

Must have been a loan, either a kid or an out favour first teamer whose wages we'd pay a portion of.

wanderlust wrote:
I didn't think you could get strikers for that kind of money.

You can't, as evidenced by the fact that we haven't signed him. 

I'll rephrase: Who was the striker who potentially could have signed for £4k a week?

He wasn't named

How long has Lennon got left on his contract, wingman?

Just over two years

Boggersbelief wrote:Just over two years

I hope he stays.

If there's any truth in the rumour about the £4k/wk striker it would imply that the Ream money has at least in part been put aside for debt repayment. Or to buy a big screen to watch all our goals on.

wanderlust wrote:If there's any truth in the rumour about the £4k/wk striker it would imply that the Ream money has at least in part been put aside for debt repayment. Or to buy a big screen to watch all our goals on.

What's the point in paying a small bit of the large debt off, won't make a difference really, but a big screen would be justified.

Boggersbelief wrote:He wasn't named

Lord Voldemort

scottjames30 wrote:


What's the point in paying a small bit of the large debt off, won't make a difference really, but a big screen would be justified.

Thatcherism explained in one succinct sentence.

Lita's currently playing in the Greek Third Division.

I bet we could get him for far less than four grand a week.

They must be paying him in Kleftiko and Ouzo.

Breadman wrote:

scottjames30 wrote:


What's the point in paying a small bit of the large debt off, won't make a difference really, but a big screen would be justified.

Thatcherism explained in one succinct sentence.

I'd rather take a risk, more money for a striker.

We're that much in the shit, we should go all in.

We would be only paying a small bit of interest anyway, it will only give us six months grace.

wanderlust wrote:If there's any truth in the rumour about the £4k/wk striker it would imply that the Ream money has at least in part been put aside for debt repayment. Or to buy a big screen to watch all our goals on.

 what goals are these then Lusty?   I can't see us scoring enough to justify a new screen