8th worst run club in the UK

Blackburn are never short of eggs though. [You must be registered and logged in to see this image.]

For the Umpteenth time I repeat myself ...... any regular business run this way would have been bankrupt years ago and the management fired years back.  For some unknown reason Phil and his cronies keep drawing nice paychecks. Imagine Big Eddie opening the paper to see us 8th on the list. Wouldn't any normal person be pissed off ?
 
The only hope for us is to be sold which is long overdue IMO.

I'm guessing the only reason Blackburn are higher on this list than us is that they fell short of complying with FFP and we somehow didn't.
You've gotta say, they aren't doing bad compared to us, which is depressing considering how crap things were looking for them when they had Steve Kean and it didn't look like Venkys would ever get rid of him. 
At least they've got a few players that are top quality at this level. It seemed ridiculous when they paid £8m for Rhodes but he really is fantastic. I bet eight million is more than we've spent on countless players over three years, yet they definitely got better value for money.

Now to rub salt in the wounds, the club have spent 2 million quid saved from lifeline/goldline on a new state of the art scoreboard, so that's alreet then, CUNTS.

MartinBWFC wrote:Now to rub salt in the wounds, the club have spent 2 million quid saved from lifeline/goldline on a new state of the art scoreboard, so that's alreet then, CUNTS.

Get fooked

I hope that's not true. What's theft point if a score board without a team able to fucking score

MartinBWFC wrote:Now to rub salt in the wounds, the club have spent 2 million quid saved from lifeline/goldline on a new state of the art scoreboard, so that's alreet then, CUNTS.

Given the amount that a few of us on here have contributed to that particular financial black hole over the last thirty years, I reckon they should name it the "Bolton Nuts - Thankyou Dickheads Scoreboard."

Apparently that scoreboard is being paid for by sponsers and not directly out of the clubs funds. Of course there was a cost savings by having our side of the scoreboard never go past zero or one.  Less LED lights in it....

terenceanne wrote:Apparently that scoreboard is being paid for by sponsers and not directly out of the clubs funds. Of course there was a cost savings by having our side of the scoreboard never go past zero or one.  Less LED lights in it....

According to the clubs officials website it has come from the lottery funds they have saved up.

y2johnny wrote:

terenceanne wrote:Apparently that scoreboard is being paid for by sponsers and not directly out of the clubs funds. Of course there was a cost savings by having our side of the scoreboard never go past zero or one.  Less LED lights in it....

According to the clubs officials website it has come from the lottery funds they have saved up.

How a business benefits from a charity fund is really beyond belief!