Sports shield takeover

Breadman wrote:Not at all.

As I've already said, I don't expect anyone to accept what I'm saying at face value and that's fair enough - I'd be the same.

The FL obviously have some reservations about the people involved and I now think I understand more about why this is.

In isolation, what we know about Anderson is mildly concerning but I've also now seen something else about someone else involved which concerns me greatly.

And that's all I'm saying.

Boggersbelief wrote:

Doesn't make sense that you have some SHOCKING news but you won't tell anyone..

Breadman wrote:Something came to light last night which I can't divulge on here but I'm now far less sure about all this.

In the light of what I found out, I've now got some very real reservations about Sports Shield.

I'm not going to bang on about it and I wouldn't expect anybody to accept what I'm saying as fact, but I can honestly say that the person who told me is 100% trustworthy (we grew up in the same house) and the information I was given is 100% accurate and does not show SS in a good light at all.

In fact, I wouldn't touch anybody involved with a barge pole.

That's all I can say and I wouldn't expect anybody to take my word for it, but I'm more than a little concerned now.

Diadora wrote:Well I lad I work with yesterday told me his dad is mates with John Disley and he is in the inner circle group , not sure is this is what you mean , but if true not sure what to think my self

Diadora wrote:How do you know for sure or can't you disclose ?

Diadora wrote:How do you know for sure or can't you disclose ?

Breadman wrote:Sorry mate, no can do.

Breadman wrote:Yeah, you're right.

Forget I said anything.