First it was "Post Truth" and now this......

Natasha Whittam wrote:I can't believe he didn't mention his armchair.

It comes with the house.

Unlike the penis which comes with decreasing regularity.

okocha wrote:Lusty: your own words undermine your assertions and sweeping generalisations about the voting motives of over 17 million people.

" would seem to be a fair indicator of the more common motives"  Hardly convincing! Floundering convictions?


You're not in any position to presume to be able to judge everyone. Nor is anyone else. That's why there is still debate and uncertainty.......but this is boring now. Let's give it a rest!

It's not about judgement though is it? It's about statistical significance as you well know. 

What we can say for certain is that the figures are 100% accurate for those people in the sample. I do accept that there is a minute chance that the 40,000 people sampled could by some incredible twist of fate not be representative of the rest but the chances of that are about the same as BWFC winning the Premiership this year.