You are not connected. Please login or register

Bolton Nuts » BWFC » Bolton Wanderers Banter » Ken Anderson - update.

Ken Anderson - update.

Go to page : Previous  1 ... 16 ... 28, 29, 30 ... 34  Next

Go down  Message [Page 29 of 34]

841Ken Anderson - update. - Page 29 Empty Re: Ken Anderson - update. on Thu Jan 17 2019, 15:20

Sluffy

Sluffy
Admin
[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.] wrote:
[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.] wrote:Thought I'd post this quote from tonight's Kangaroo Court.

Is Ken Anderson scaring investors off with his demands or behaviour?

[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]: “A lot of interested parties may be waiting for administration. Ken has never been in a position of power to demand anything and people may wait to pick it up for nothing.”

[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]


So there you have it - from the mouth of Iles who is banned by KA, at the forum totally made up of anti-Anderson's, and quoted and reported by one of the blogs calling for the protest on Monday against KA - yet Wanderlust has told us about a billion times how KA is deliberately preventing anyone (including Ron Billionaire!) from buying the club off him!!!

Rolling Eyes
The comment proves my point rather than anything. Anderson has indeed never been in a position of power to demand anything - but that didn't stop him from doing it - which is exactly why the investors walked.

Proves your point!!!

Hahaha!

Read the question that was put again.

All they had to do was say yes to it if they knew it to be true - but they didn't.

Your claim about this is as false and as made up as those assets KA's 'pawned' that you are still unable to tell us what these mythical things were despite being asked by me and others repeatedly now.



842Ken Anderson - update. - Page 29 Empty Re: Ken Anderson - update. on Thu Jan 17 2019, 15:27

wanderlust


Nat Lofthouse
Nat Lofthouse
[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.] wrote:
[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.] wrote:
[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.] wrote:Thought I'd post this quote from tonight's Kangaroo Court.

Is Ken Anderson scaring investors off with his demands or behaviour?

[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]: “A lot of interested parties may be waiting for administration. Ken has never been in a position of power to demand anything and people may wait to pick it up for nothing.”

[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]


So there you have it - from the mouth of Iles who is banned by KA, at the forum totally made up of anti-Anderson's, and quoted and reported by one of the blogs calling for the protest on Monday against KA - yet Wanderlust has told us about a billion times how KA is deliberately preventing anyone (including Ron Billionaire!) from buying the club off him!!!

Rolling Eyes
The comment proves my point rather than anything. Anderson has indeed never been in a position of power to demand anything - but that didn't stop him from doing it - which is exactly why the investors walked.

Proves your point!!!

Hahaha!

Read the question that was put again.

All they had to do was say yes to it if they knew it to be true - but they didn't.

Your claim about this is as false and as made up as those assets KA's 'pawned' that you are still unable to tell us what these mythical things were despite being asked by me and others repeatedly now.



You clearly have difficulty with comprehension so I won't waste any more time explaining what actually happened to you.

843Ken Anderson - update. - Page 29 Empty Re: Ken Anderson - update. on Thu Jan 17 2019, 15:53

Sluffy

Sluffy
Admin
[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.] wrote:
[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.] wrote:
[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.] wrote:
[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.] wrote:Thought I'd post this quote from tonight's Kangaroo Court.

Is Ken Anderson scaring investors off with his demands or behaviour?

[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]: “A lot of interested parties may be waiting for administration. Ken has never been in a position of power to demand anything and people may wait to pick it up for nothing.”

[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]


So there you have it - from the mouth of Iles who is banned by KA, at the forum totally made up of anti-Anderson's, and quoted and reported by one of the blogs calling for the protest on Monday against KA - yet Wanderlust has told us about a billion times how KA is deliberately preventing anyone (including Ron Billionaire!) from buying the club off him!!!

Rolling Eyes
The comment proves my point rather than anything. Anderson has indeed never been in a position of power to demand anything - but that didn't stop him from doing it - which is exactly why the investors walked.

Proves your point!!!

Hahaha!

Read the question that was put again.

All they had to do was say yes to it if they knew it to be true - but they didn't.

Your claim about this is as false and as made up as those assets KA's 'pawned' that you are still unable to tell us what these mythical things were despite being asked by me and others repeatedly now.



You clearly have difficulty with comprehension so I won't waste any more time explaining what actually happened to you.

The question was -

Is Ken Anderson scaring investors off with his demands or behaviour?

You are still claiming above - which I've highlighted - that his behaviour was such to "scare investors off" - which was what the questionnaire asked - and to which the panel answered that he hadn't.

One of us clearly has problems with their comprehension - but it certainly isn't me.

844Ken Anderson - update. - Page 29 Empty Re: Ken Anderson - update. on Thu Jan 17 2019, 16:09

Norpig

Norpig
Nat Lofthouse
Nat Lofthouse
I see Kenocchio is a little worried about Monday judging by this statement. I'm going to have to hide my banner and tennis balls in my undies i reckon  Very Happy

Banners need a fire certificate? Do me a favour  Laughing

[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

845Ken Anderson - update. - Page 29 Empty Re: Ken Anderson - update. on Thu Jan 17 2019, 16:17

wanderlust


Nat Lofthouse
Nat Lofthouse
[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.] wrote:
[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.] wrote:
[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.] wrote:
[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.] wrote:
[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.] wrote:Thought I'd post this quote from tonight's Kangaroo Court.

Is Ken Anderson scaring investors off with his demands or behaviour?

[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]: “A lot of interested parties may be waiting for administration. Ken has never been in a position of power to demand anything and people may wait to pick it up for nothing.”

[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]


So there you have it - from the mouth of Iles who is banned by KA, at the forum totally made up of anti-Anderson's, and quoted and reported by one of the blogs calling for the protest on Monday against KA - yet Wanderlust has told us about a billion times how KA is deliberately preventing anyone (including Ron Billionaire!) from buying the club off him!!!

Rolling Eyes
The comment proves my point rather than anything. Anderson has indeed never been in a position of power to demand anything - but that didn't stop him from doing it - which is exactly why the investors walked.

Proves your point!!!

Hahaha!

Read the question that was put again.

All they had to do was say yes to it if they knew it to be true - but they didn't.

Your claim about this is as false and as made up as those assets KA's 'pawned' that you are still unable to tell us what these mythical things were despite being asked by me and others repeatedly now.



You clearly have difficulty with comprehension so I won't waste any more time explaining what actually happened to you.

The question was -

Is Ken Anderson scaring investors off with his demands or behaviour?

You are still claiming above - which I've highlighted - that his behaviour was such to "scare investors off" - which was what the questionnaire asked - and to which the panel answered that he hadn't.

One of us clearly has problems with their comprehension - but it certainly isn't me.
Demands OR behaviour. Just because Iles chose to answer the question by focusing on the demands element of the question doesn't in any way suggest what you are erroneously claiming. Read the question yourself - only this time do it properly.
Anyhow, Iles wasn't the source of my information on how Anderson conducted himself and may have no knowledge of it.

846Ken Anderson - update. - Page 29 Empty Re: Ken Anderson - update. on Thu Jan 17 2019, 16:45

Sluffy

Sluffy
Admin
[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.] wrote:
[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.] wrote:
[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.] wrote:
[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.] wrote:
[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.] wrote:
[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.] wrote:Thought I'd post this quote from tonight's Kangaroo Court.

Is Ken Anderson scaring investors off with his demands or behaviour?

[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]: “A lot of interested parties may be waiting for administration. Ken has never been in a position of power to demand anything and people may wait to pick it up for nothing.”

[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]


So there you have it - from the mouth of Iles who is banned by KA, at the forum totally made up of anti-Anderson's, and quoted and reported by one of the blogs calling for the protest on Monday against KA - yet Wanderlust has told us about a billion times how KA is deliberately preventing anyone (including Ron Billionaire!) from buying the club off him!!!

Rolling Eyes
The comment proves my point rather than anything. Anderson has indeed never been in a position of power to demand anything - but that didn't stop him from doing it - which is exactly why the investors walked.

Proves your point!!!

Hahaha!

Read the question that was put again.

All they had to do was say yes to it if they knew it to be true - but they didn't.

Your claim about this is as false and as made up as those assets KA's 'pawned' that you are still unable to tell us what these mythical things were despite being asked by me and others repeatedly now.



You clearly have difficulty with comprehension so I won't waste any more time explaining what actually happened to you.

The question was -

Is Ken Anderson scaring investors off with his demands or behaviour?

You are still claiming above - which I've highlighted - that his behaviour was such to "scare investors off" - which was what the questionnaire asked - and to which the panel answered that he hadn't.

One of us clearly has problems with their comprehension - but it certainly isn't me.
Demands OR behaviour. Just because Iles chose to answer the question by focusing on the demands element of the question doesn't in any way suggest what you are erroneously claiming. Read the question yourself - only this time do it properly.
Anyhow, Iles wasn't the source of my information on how Anderson conducted himself and may have no knowledge of it.

It was abundantly clear to all that it wasn't asked as a two part question and it wasn't answered as a two part question.

You know that as well as everyone else does - you're not fooling anyone.

If you want to believe a man down at your local in Norfolk that is up to you but Iles, McGinlay and the ST all of whom are at or around the club to pick up rumours and scandal, than you in East Anglia - and any of them could have answered the question with a simple 'yes' - but not a single one of them did!

Fancy that, you sat in your armchair some 200 plus miles away from the club knowing more than KA's three main 'haters' namely Iles, the ST and the figurehead of the protest against him - all who are on the spot and all desperate to see the back of him!

Rolling Eyes

847Ken Anderson - update. - Page 29 Empty Re: Ken Anderson - update. on Fri Jan 18 2019, 01:00

wanderlust


Nat Lofthouse
Nat Lofthouse
[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.] wrote:
[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.] wrote:
[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.] wrote:
[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.] wrote:
[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.] wrote:
[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.] wrote:
[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.] wrote:Thought I'd post this quote from tonight's Kangaroo Court.

Is Ken Anderson scaring investors off with his demands or behaviour?

[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]: “A lot of interested parties may be waiting for administration. Ken has never been in a position of power to demand anything and people may wait to pick it up for nothing.”

[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]


So there you have it - from the mouth of Iles who is banned by KA, at the forum totally made up of anti-Anderson's, and quoted and reported by one of the blogs calling for the protest on Monday against KA - yet Wanderlust has told us about a billion times how KA is deliberately preventing anyone (including Ron Billionaire!) from buying the club off him!!!

Rolling Eyes
The comment proves my point rather than anything. Anderson has indeed never been in a position of power to demand anything - but that didn't stop him from doing it - which is exactly why the investors walked.

Proves your point!!!

Hahaha!

Read the question that was put again.

All they had to do was say yes to it if they knew it to be true - but they didn't.

Your claim about this is as false and as made up as those assets KA's 'pawned' that you are still unable to tell us what these mythical things were despite being asked by me and others repeatedly now.



You clearly have difficulty with comprehension so I won't waste any more time explaining what actually happened to you.

The question was -

Is Ken Anderson scaring investors off with his demands or behaviour?

You are still claiming above - which I've highlighted - that his behaviour was such to "scare investors off" - which was what the questionnaire asked - and to which the panel answered that he hadn't.

One of us clearly has problems with their comprehension - but it certainly isn't me.
Demands OR behaviour. Just because Iles chose to answer the question by focusing on the demands element of the question doesn't in any way suggest what you are erroneously claiming. Read the question yourself - only this time do it properly.
Anyhow, Iles wasn't the source of my information on how Anderson conducted himself and may have no knowledge of it.

It was abundantly clear to all that it wasn't asked as a two part question and it wasn't answered as a two part question.

You know that as well as everyone else does - you're not fooling anyone.

If you want to believe a man down at your local in Norfolk that is up to you but Iles, McGinlay and the ST all of whom are at or around the club to pick up rumours and scandal, than you in East Anglia - and any of them could have answered the question with a simple 'yes' - but not a single one of them did!

Fancy that, you sat in your armchair some 200 plus miles away from the club knowing more than KA's three main 'haters' namely Iles, the ST and the figurehead of the protest against him - all who are on the spot and all desperate to see the back of him!

Rolling Eyes
If you want to believe a keyboard warrior who never goes to any BWFC games and sits on his arse talking shite despite barely speaking English and not understanding the basics of logic or comprehension, yet supplementing his verbal diarrhoea and inability to see anything other than a single perspective with irrelevant pleas for understanding interspersed with abusive bollocks and emojis as a substitute for a life and a sense of humour....

[You must be registered and logged in to see this image.]

848Ken Anderson - update. - Page 29 Empty Re: Ken Anderson - update. on Fri Jan 18 2019, 13:28

Sluffy

Sluffy
Admin
[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.] wrote:If you want to believe a keyboard warrior who never goes to any BWFC games and sits on his arse talking shite despite barely speaking English and not understanding the basics of logic or comprehension, yet supplementing his verbal diarrhoea and inability to see anything other than a single perspective with irrelevant pleas for understanding interspersed with abusive bollocks and emojis as a substitute for a life and a sense of humour....

[You must be registered and logged in to see this image.]

Fine example of doing a 'Bonnar' - posting after the pubs have closed!

Turning into being a bit of a habit now Wanderlust.

I guess Dry January is long since over for you!


849Ken Anderson - update. - Page 29 Empty Re: Ken Anderson - update. on Fri Jan 18 2019, 15:41

wanderlust


Nat Lofthouse
Nat Lofthouse
[You must be registered and logged in to see this image.]

850Ken Anderson - update. - Page 29 Empty Re: Ken Anderson - update. on Fri Jan 18 2019, 16:01

karlypants

karlypants
Nat Lofthouse
Nat Lofthouse
[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.] wrote:[You must be registered and logged in to see this image.]

It's a wanker gif if anyone wanted to know what Wander posted! Rolling Eyes

851Ken Anderson - update. - Page 29 Empty Re: Ken Anderson - update. on Fri Jan 18 2019, 16:03

Norpig

Norpig
Nat Lofthouse
Nat Lofthouse
Whats wanking? Never heard of such a thing  Very Happy

852Ken Anderson - update. - Page 29 Empty Re: Ken Anderson - update. on Fri Jan 18 2019, 16:05

boltonbonce

boltonbonce
Nat Lofthouse
Nat Lofthouse
It's one of Norpig's technique tutorials. Very Happy

853Ken Anderson - update. - Page 29 Empty Re: Ken Anderson - update. on Fri Jan 18 2019, 16:06

Norpig

Norpig
Nat Lofthouse
Nat Lofthouse
That chap taught me everything  i know, a true expert on playing the pink oboe.

854Ken Anderson - update. - Page 29 Empty Re: Ken Anderson - update. on Fri Jan 18 2019, 16:07

boltonbonce

boltonbonce
Nat Lofthouse
Nat Lofthouse
[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.] wrote:That chap taught me everything  i know, a true expert on playing the pink oboe.
Those days are long gone for me.

I've got to prop it up on a bamboo stick just to have a pee.

855Ken Anderson - update. - Page 29 Empty Re: Ken Anderson - update. on Fri Jan 18 2019, 16:08

karlypants

karlypants
Nat Lofthouse
Nat Lofthouse
[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.] wrote:
[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.] wrote:That chap taught me everything  i know, a true expert on playing the pink oboe.
Those days are long gone for me.

I've got to prop it up on a bamboo stick just to have a pee.

A bit like your nose Boncey! Laughing

856Ken Anderson - update. - Page 29 Empty Re: Ken Anderson - update. on Fri Jan 18 2019, 16:21

boltonbonce

boltonbonce
Nat Lofthouse
Nat Lofthouse
That's Thomas Wedders. Born around 1720. Quite a hooter.

You wouldn't want to do a line of coke with him.

857Ken Anderson - update. - Page 29 Empty Re: Ken Anderson - update. on Fri Jan 18 2019, 17:02

wanderlust


Nat Lofthouse
Nat Lofthouse
[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.] wrote:
[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.] wrote:[You must be registered and logged in to see this image.]

It's a wanker gif if anyone wanted to know what Wander posted! Rolling Eyes
Is it? I thought it was a scientist who had developed a tic after being electrocuted.

858Ken Anderson - update. - Page 29 Empty Re: Ken Anderson - update. on Fri Jan 18 2019, 17:04

boltonbonce

boltonbonce
Nat Lofthouse
Nat Lofthouse
It's the brother Don King doesn't like to talk about.

859Ken Anderson - update. - Page 29 Empty Re: Ken Anderson - update. on Sat Jan 19 2019, 00:17

Sluffy

Sluffy
Admin
Hopefully many of our season ticket holders will take up the ‘bring a friend for free offer’ for our home game against West Brom on Monday and we’ll have a large crowd in front of the Sky Sports cameras to cheer the players on for what will be a tough test.
Season ticket holders have until 5pm on Saturday to redeem this offer and more information can be found here.

It seems such a long time ago since we started off the season with a memorable win against West Brom at the Hawthorns and I know that the players will give it their all to try and get a result on Monday evening, which could act as a springboard for us to go on a positive run of results.

The club is aware of planned action by some supporters ahead of the game. I really hope that common sense prevails and that these don’t take place as I certainly don’t think that they will be helpful for the club or the team as they prepare for the game. However, if they do, then I hope they are done as peacefully as possible and do not cause any disruption to the match itself as we certainly don’t want to face any punitive action by the football authorities. If you haven’t already seen it, here is a link to the article the club published yesterday.

It appears that the protest is being led by a very small minority of people, which is often the case and has clearly been seen at a number of other clubs. I do have to wonder what their ultimate aim is? History has clearly shown at these other clubs that nothing has been achieved.

Earlier this week, all monies owed to existing football creditors, the PFA and HMRC were paid.
To that end, I’m delighted that Gary O’Neil has signed a new short-term deal with us while Remi Matthews has returned to the club to complete his permanent transfer from Norwich City.

By the time the transfer window closes, I’m confident that we’ll have a squad capable of staying in this division and as always we need your continued 100% support to get behind the players to help achieve this.
We have ten games remaining at the University of Bolton Stadium and it’s imperative that you all show your continued support in each of the games. Every point is vital and we must battle as one to ensure we get them.

I’d also like to remind you about the IberCup which is taking place at the stadium and training ground in May. This is the first time that this prestigious youth football tournament has taken place in England and we are absolutely delighted and thrilled for it to be taking place in Bolton.
As well as hosting some of the top youth teams from all over the world, there is also the showcase tournament which is aimed at grassroots teams. This offers a once in a lifetime opportunity for some of the young players involved and I would urge that if you have any connection to local youth teams then why not consider registering and taking part. More information can be found by clicking here.

I was invited to take part in two radio interviews earlier this week with Five Live and also BBC Radio Manchester’s fans’ forum. Unfortunately, I was unable to attend them as I was overseas and I gave my apologies.
I have since heard the recordings of each show and I actually thought the Five Live broadcast was fair and balanced, and based on the information they had available.
I welcome and encourage these debates as I believe that football is all about opinions and thrives on the banter that emanates from the match itself, workplace or at pubs.
However, some of the conversations that took place at the fans’ forum were in my opinion well wide of the mark. I have no desire to repeat them all here as I think there is no point in trying to reignite a war of words which may prove distracting for the team.

But I did find one particular point somewhat surprising when unfavourable remarks were made about our Academy. I think the recent successes of the under 18s and under 23s do speak for themselves and the fact that a number of our younger players are out on loan with other clubs and performing really well suggest that the Academy is more than fit for purpose.
It wasn’t that long ago that the club proudly announced the Academy obtaining Category Two status. With the support from the Bolton Wanderers Development Association, we were able to build a dome up at the training ground which not only provides benefits for the club but is also widely used by the community.

Suffice to say, that through my series of webnotes published on the club’s official website, I have tried to make my stance and position very clear, and that everything I have written is based on fact and honesty, whereas a great deal of the comments made at the forum and regularly on social media are factually incorrect and at best misconstrued assumptions.

As they say, a little knowledge is a dangerous thing.

We do get inundated on a regular basis for confidential information and the reason we don’t comment or respond is that the information is confidential, and without speaking on their behalf the EFL I presume adopt a similar approach when dealing with enquiries of this nature.

Anything that we feel appropriate and can and or are able to say is usually published by the club through its existing channels.
My focus remains on doing what I believe is best for the club and I fully understand that the decisions I take are not always pleasant or welcome. At the present time I am fully concentrating on the club retaining our Championship status, trying to find a new investor and striving to make the club financially self-sufficient in the meantime.

Unfortunately, there has been a great deal of misinformed comment about the efforts being made to sell the club and even the price being asked and once again a lot of this is total nonsense and misconstrued assumptions and conclusions.

It is well documented that we are not the only club available to buy and, like us, a number of other clubs have had a number of false starts, such as Newcastle United, Hull City, Charlton Athletic, Notts County and Port Vale to name a few and l now understand Sheffield Wednesday is also available.
I have also noticed that several club owners who recently bought clubs have gone on record to say that with hindsight they wouldn’t do so again. 

I recently read an interesting article published by FourFourTwo which I believe perfectly encapsulates the problems facing Championship clubs without parachute payments - [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]
There have also been discussions about Championship attendances this season and I thought the following article would be of interest to you: [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

In spite, of the recent criticism I have read and been told about, I have been buoyed by the number of well wishes I have received from the club’s employees which is in total contrast to some of the negative comments about low staff morale made at the forum and in the media. Indeed, a senior manager recently wrote to me reminding me about the ‘high percentage of staff retention between the club, hotel and academy of circa 85% to 90% which to me speaks volumes about the support internally.’ I am also greatly encouraged by the comments and kind wishes I have received from many supporters and people involved with football at all levels.

Interestingly, I was told that over the last week or so the hits on my recent web notes were over 100,000 which is a huge increase on the usual number of hits on all subjects on the website. As they say, ‘all publicity is good publicity’, or to quote Oscar Wilde: ‘There is only one thing in life worse than being talked about, and that is not being talked about.’

In a perverse way I find that quite reassuring when I am told about the vile and hostile stuff on social media about me and my family, but unfortunately that seems to go with the territory these days.

Sadly, I know from my conversations with the late Ed Davies that it was this type of hostile comments and abuse in the media and social media that played a big part in his decision and finally prompted him to withdraw financial support and put the club up for sale.

Once again, I would ask everyone to please continue to get behind the players and the club, and be the twelfth man on Monday night against West Brom on Monday irrespective of everything else that is going on, as I am sure like me you will agree that the future of the club is far more important than anything else at this time.

Best wishes,

Ken

[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

860Ken Anderson - update. - Page 29 Empty Re: Ken Anderson - update. on Sat Jan 19 2019, 08:38

Kane57

Kane57
Tony Kelly
Tony Kelly
What a cunt

861Ken Anderson - update. - Page 29 Empty Re: Ken Anderson - update. on Sat Jan 19 2019, 10:09

wanderlust


Nat Lofthouse
Nat Lofthouse
Maybe a tenth of that press release was about the football and the rest was either a sales pitch or having a go at his detractors. Priorities are there for all to see.

862Ken Anderson - update. - Page 29 Empty Re: Ken Anderson - update. on Sat Jan 19 2019, 10:16

Kane57

Kane57
Tony Kelly
Tony Kelly
Don't forget an imaginary conversation with a now dead Eddie Davies which absolutely never happened.

863Ken Anderson - update. - Page 29 Empty Re: Ken Anderson - update. on Sat Jan 19 2019, 10:21

Growler


Tony Kelly
Tony Kelly
I think the parachute payments ending played a bigger part in Eddie Davies pulling the plug

864Ken Anderson - update. - Page 29 Empty Re: Ken Anderson - update. on Sat Jan 19 2019, 12:56

y2johnny


Tony Kelly
Tony Kelly
Norwich obviously happy with agreement we had in place. Not saying hes the honest john type still but players and clubs still want to do business with us.

865Ken Anderson - update. - Page 29 Empty Re: Ken Anderson - update. on Sat Jan 19 2019, 13:10

MartinBWFC

MartinBWFC
Frank Worthington
Frank Worthington
So Ken ha paid his debts now the EFL monies has arrived, what happens next when the ED loan needs repaying? when the wages need paying? indeed when is he going to pay the incompetent manager his bonus for fluking the stay of execution in the Championship? it's going to be a lot bumpier going forward.

866Ken Anderson - update. - Page 29 Empty Re: Ken Anderson - update. on Sat Jan 19 2019, 13:16

wanderlust


Nat Lofthouse
Nat Lofthouse
[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.] wrote:Norwich obviously happy with agreement we had in place. Not saying hes the honest john type still but players and clubs still want to do business with us.
He is surplus to requirements at Norwich as they are aiming for the Prem and have 3 good goalies. Now he's not their problem although Farke had thought they'd already sorted it out ages ago. More a case of offloading dead weight than wanting to do business. Not saying he's a crap goalie - he isn't, but they've got better. Didn't even get a paragraph about the transfer in the EDP and they have an 8 page pullout on NCFC every week!
As for the O'Neil deal, not sure he had any other options so it's not surprising that deal was finalised. Both deals were thought to have been concluded well before the EFL loan and Doidge issues. Before we can judge whether anyone of note wants to do business with us now, we'll have to see what happens going forward rather than look back at deals that were already in the pipeline.

867Ken Anderson - update. - Page 29 Empty Re: Ken Anderson - update. on Sat Jan 19 2019, 13:42

Kane57

Kane57
Tony Kelly
Tony Kelly
[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.] wrote:Norwich obviously happy with agreement we had in place. Not saying hes the honest john type still but players and clubs still want to do business with us.

Clubs want to do business with teams who have actual money, not magic beans like Ken

868Ken Anderson - update. - Page 29 Empty Re: Ken Anderson - update. on Sat Jan 19 2019, 22:49

y2johnny


Tony Kelly
Tony Kelly
Well they seemed to understand and didnt kick up a fuss one bit

869Ken Anderson - update. - Page 29 Empty Re: Ken Anderson - update. on Sat Jan 19 2019, 22:51

observer


Andy Walker
Andy Walker
[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.] wrote:Well they seemed to understand and didnt kick up a fuss one bit
As we say in the States, "money talks and nobody walks."  In this case, after money actually changes hands!

870Ken Anderson - update. - Page 29 Empty Re: Ken Anderson - update. on Sun Jan 20 2019, 00:03

y2johnny


Tony Kelly
Tony Kelly
Imo, i think ken found himself against a bit of an eccentric in the fgrfc chairman. And the fgrfc chairman jumped on the fact bwfc fans where turning against ken.  Norwich understood the situation and didnt make a meal of it,  so either the fgrfc chairman was being impatient or we decided doidge wasn't making the right progress and sacked him off in completely the wrong way. Either way it was handled piss poorly by both sides.

If this hadn't happened, it would of been business as usual. And by that i mean juggling the finances to make ends meet. 

The biggest problem is ken doesnt have the finances to run the club.  He was obviously hoping it would be a quick flip. It wasn't.  

He's not someone who should be the face of the club. He needs to let someone else takeover communications. He needs to employ someone who well tell him certain things shouldnt be done or said. 

Again, imo, the whole club is looking tinpot.  And i include the fans in that.  Piss poor attempts at organising protests will end up with a quick march round the ground with 30 to 40 people and two pissed up idiots running on the pitch or launching tennis balls.

You can probably tell, but I'm disillusioned with it all, and i mean football in general. Even if we got a mega rich chairman/owner, as soon as a story of how he made his money surfaces, we will be organising another tin pot protest.  Remember quick quid......turned down a 7 figure sponsorship deal and ended up with 150k from fibrelec.  And it was all downhill from there

Back to top  Message [Page 29 of 34]

Go to page : Previous  1 ... 16 ... 28, 29, 30 ... 34  Next

Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum