What is your reaction to this?

Some sicko actually shagged that.

Leftie Corbyn obsessed "journalist" (see how it works yet) Kevin McGuire on the TV this morning supporting a terrorist over the the safety of the British people.

Not normally a left wing position that so I'm surprised.

Bangladesh doen't want her either: https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-47312207

Why? She seems lovely.

Hipster_Nebula wrote:Leftie Corbyn obsessed "journalist" (see how it works yet) Kevin McGuire on the TV this morning supporting a terrorist over the the safety of the British people.

Not normally a left wing position that so I'm surprised.

What are your thoughts on Jacob Rees Mogg’s position?

BREAKING: CORBYN "LET HER BACK IN AND SUPPORT HER"

T.R.O.Y wrote:

Hipster_Nebula wrote:Leftie Corbyn obsessed "journalist" (see how it works yet) Kevin McGuire on the TV this morning supporting a terrorist over the the safety of the British people.

Not normally a left wing position that so I'm surprised.

What are your thoughts on Jacob Rees Mogg’s position?

What did he say? If he suggests anything about her being allowed back to this country then obviously I disagree with him.

Correct. Question Time last week, we ‘should show conpassion’.

Well he's wrong. Treat people the way you would wish to be treated. The golden rule should be applied.

Hipster_Nebula wrote:BREAKING: CORBYN "LET HER BACK IN AND SUPPORT HER"

Corbyn has a real talent for losing potential voters. In fact it is probably his only talent.

Funny you say that when Corbyn increased Labour's vote share more than any of the party's leaders since 1945.

I think the argument is that we should work to reverse her radicalisation/brainwashing whilst charging her here as appropriate.....

T.R.O.Y wrote:Funny you say that when Corbyn increased Labour's vote share more than any of the party's leaders since 1945.

Less seats than Neil kinnock.

The point was about winning votes, not seats.

Oh.

It is usually seats that allow you to form a government.

T.R.O.Y wrote:Funny you say that when Corbyn increased Labour's vote share more than any of the party's leaders since 1945.

Not that it had anything to do with membership only costing £3.

And it has been losing members ever since due to Corbyn's incompetence and fondness for brexit.

Hipster_Nebula wrote:Oh.

It is usually seats that allow you to form a government.

That's why Shirley Porter was so adept at gerrymandering.

Hipster_Nebula wrote:Oh.

It is usually seats that allow you to form a government.

Again, the point was around votes not seats. Not sure why you’re struggling to grasp that.

xmiles wrote:

T.R.O.Y wrote:Funny you say that when Corbyn increased Labour's vote share more than any of the party's leaders since 1945.

Not that it had anything to do with membership only costing £3.

And it has been losing members ever since due to Corbyn's incompetence and fondness for brexit.

Im talking about the General election vote share not leadership election. Yet still the membership it at its highest ever level - so you’re proving my point.

T.R.O.Y wrote:

Hipster_Nebula wrote:Oh.

It is usually seats that allow you to form a government.

Again, the point was around votes not seats. Not sure why you’re struggling to grasp that.

That only happened because UKIP's voters from the previous General Election evaporated and were picked up by the other parties.

Did you know that May, who shot her foot off by calling the 2017 election which was wifely considered a disaster for her, increased her party's share by the sixth biggest increase since 1945!

Hardly a great achievement for Corbyn when you look at it in context to how his main rival did in the same election.

https://www.hitc.com/en-gb/2017/07/28/9-biggest-upward-election-swings-since-1945/