Ken Anderson - update.

Norpig wrote:Toxic only between you and Lusty, no one else Sluffy 

This place is turning into a dictatorship, you'd rather have yes men agreeing with you and the site being deathly quiet as you put it than letting people have a healthy debate. 
It takes two to tango sluffy, you have been as bad as name calling (moonman etc) and throwing around insults as Lusty and BOTH of you are equally to blame for the tripe we all have to wade through on here because neither of you can let it drop and be seen as the one in the wrong.

Well I've put an end to it.

I'm the one that pays for the site and I've had enough of someone who tells me I'm a liar, locks and deletes threads, accuses me of having mental health issues and severe personality disorders and all because he clearly can't stand to admit he is wrong over something absolutely trivial and meaningless on an obscure footy forum and refuses to let things drop.

Christ is calling someone a 'moonman' even remotely comparable to being an insult when compared to all that?

I've/we've warned him about his personal abuse - and we've even had 'official' complaints from members in the past about it.  He's already had bans for abuse in relation to more than me and still he persists with it.

He's not willing to modify his behaviour one iota and after three years, several bans, and many, many warnings and I've just had enough of it now.

I even offered to draw a line under things and not be an 'I told you so' seeing that Anderson had gone and we now had a new owner.

I was even stupidly concerned enough to think he may have misunderstood stuff and tried to warn him that he might be embarrassing himself with his late night post on Wways - in order that he could amend or delete it - but instead the thanks I got for this concern was yet a further barrage of abuse greeting me when I logged in this morning.

I simply don't need to tolerate that anymore particularly as I'm paying for the privilege to give him and everybody else a forum to enjoy.

I've never abused my position on here ever and I think that three years is now a fair and reasonable amount of time to tolerate his abuse off him and for him to have a more meaningful rest from here.

I don't think that is at all unreasonable of me even if you or anyone else might.

HAPPY EASTER EVERYBODY!!![You must be registered and logged in to see this image.]

You’re a day early with the crucifixion

BoltonTillIDie wrote:You’re a day early with the crucifixion

Sluffy and Lusty have been practicing that for some time here.

observer wrote:

BoltonTillIDie wrote:You’re a day early with the crucifixion

Sluffy and Lusty have been practicing that for some time here.

Who is Lusty?

Bollotom2014 wrote:

observer wrote:

BoltonTillIDie wrote:You’re a day early with the crucifixion

Sluffy and Lusty have been practicing that for some time here.

Who is Lusty?

A banished prizefighter who sparred with Sluffy much to the bemusement of most of us. They could have made a reality show of their bickering fights.  The bottom line is we are relegated and have another iffy owner and Sluffy and Lusty will have their chance again to examine the books and the accounts if and when the new owner flies the coop.  Hopefully there will be some money behind the club to get us back to the second division.  If not, we will languish for years down in the abyss of the third tier.

Sluffy wrote:

Christ is calling someone a 'moonman' ......

Well, that's not very charitable of our lord, now is it? And just before Good Friday too!

But that's a pretty impressive contact you have there, Sluffy.... Moving in high-up circles these days, it seems...... in keeping with your godlike status here on Nuts

Personally, I thought the original jousting was quite informative, but it quickly degenerated into a (relatively) informed slanging match. Not very nice, and completely unnecessary. The only thing is that it took our minds off the absolutely crap season. Hopefully, like the season, we can see an end to Sluffy's despotism, and Wander's paranoia, (or maybe the other way around?) It'll be nice to start the season with a clean slate in all aspects and members. (Can I nominate XM for the next ban, as he's never agreed with me   )

[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

Who to believe huh.

The alternative options for him will be administration you can bet 

Norpig wrote:The alternative options for him will be administration you can bet 

It's the best we can hope for now.

I don't see any reason ken would lie at this point.

Bafooni is who we thought he was.

This has got BHS written all over it...

British Home Stores?





Never trust a man who turns up in blue slippers.


I think he bought that coat at an Oxfam shop too.

Let's face it, we all know Mr Bassini isn't exactly squeaky clean after the Watford business but for many of us (myself included) there was a feeling he's the best we're going to get as things stand. But if the club statement is accurate (and I see no real reason to believe otherwise) then he's already started the business of making promises then not living up to them.

If as Mr Bassini said he's already transferred a million quid into the club that would be simple to prove beyond doubt. His failure to do so and his statement about the share certificates strike me as bluster. Would you hand over an asset you haven't been paid for yet? I certainly wouldn't.

I also think it's clear Mr Anderson wants out of the club as soon as possible and wouldn't do anything that could hold up his exit. While I accept the possibility Mr Anderson is lying here I don't think it's the case, it's more likely Mr Bassini is attempting to wring something else, perhaps an even lower price for the club from the situation. For example if the players are not paid on time for April then they automatically become free agents at that point and therefore their 'value' as assets would be lost. Pehaps Mr Bassini believes if that happens he'll be able to buy the club for even less.

Cajunboy wrote:British Home Stores?





Never trust a man who turns up in blue slippers.


I think he bought that coat at an Oxfam shop too.

Can Sluffy tell us whether 'Howard' has made any further messages on wanderers ways. Nobody can look anymore, unless they're a member, which I'm not.

Cajunboy wrote:Howard hasn’t signed in for a month. If there was something going on with his group he’d have been active. Think his group are long gone.


Posted 2 hours ago on Wanderersways.

Thanks. Any idea who this new set up are, that Nixon refers to.

Sorry, I'm totally in the dark on that one.


It's all very frustrating.