Sylvan Ebanks-Blake - Worth a punt?

Wolves will not offer new deals to out-of-contract Sylvan Ebanks-Blake, Stephen Hunt and Christophe Berra following relegation to League One.

Striker Ebanks-Blake, 27, scored 64 goals in 193 games for Wolves and winger Hunt, 31, made 66 appearances.

Scotland defender Berra, 27, played six times under ex-boss Dean Saunders.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/0/football/22569949

I wouldn't take any of them. Ebanks-Blake should have had a good career, he had pace and strength, but it's never really happened for him in the top 2 divisions.

HELL no.

I'd have Christophe Berra, a good defender with lots of experience.

He won't be short on offers.

No he's shit.

There's a reason why wolves are in league one.

He reminds me of Nathan Blake for some reason.

scottjames30 wrote:He reminds me of Nathan Blake for some reason.

Is it because he is black?

Boggersbelief wrote:There's a reason why wolves are in league one.

There are many reasons why Wolves are in League one and Ebanks-Blake is well down the list.

Michael Bolton wrote:

scottjames30 wrote:He reminds me of Nathan Blake for some reason.

Is it because he is black?

I'm not sure.

Copper Dragon wrote:

Boggersbelief wrote:There's a reason why wolves are in league one.

There are many reasons why Wolves are in League one and Ebanks-Blake is well down the list.

Because there shit might be a good reason.

Copper Dragon wrote:

Boggersbelief wrote:There's a reason why wolves are in league one.

There are many reasons why Wolves are in League one and Ebanks-Blake is well down the list.

Oh ok. Well you wankers take him.

My team should be aiming higher, we want to win the league.

I personally would sign him, I think he is a half decent striker.

Michael Bolton wrote:I personally would sign him, I think he is a half decent striker.

Who for?

Chelsea.

scottjames30 wrote:

Michael Bolton wrote:I personally would sign him, I think he is a half decent striker.

Who for?

Chelsea.

No, I am saying for you lot he would be a good signing. My team Chelsea will be signing mouthwateringly good players.

Michael Bolton wrote:

scottjames30 wrote:

Michael Bolton wrote:I personally would sign him, I think he is a half decent striker.

Who for?

Chelsea.

No, I am saying for you lot he would be a good signing. My team Chelsea will be signing mouthwateringly good players.

Knob

Boggersbelief wrote:

Michael Bolton wrote:

scottjames30 wrote:

Michael Bolton wrote:I personally would sign him, I think he is a half decent striker.

Who for?

Chelsea.

No, I am saying for you lot he would be a good signing. My team Chelsea will be signing mouthwateringly good players.

Knob

Tosser

Knob tosser.

Boggersbelief wrote:

Copper Dragon wrote:

Boggersbelief wrote:There's a reason why wolves are in league one.

There are many reasons why Wolves are in League one and Ebanks-Blake is well down the list.

Oh ok. Well you wankers take him.

My team should be aiming higher, we want to win the league.

You daft lad.

Let's just remind ourselves where Bolton were in the league under your last manager. Yes that's right, Wolves have had two of them sorts this season.

It's going to be funny if Berra rolls up at the Reebok to work with his fellow Scotsman. then again at least you'll be getting a good defender.

Copper Dragon wrote:

Boggersbelief wrote:

Copper Dragon wrote:

Boggersbelief wrote:There's a reason why wolves are in league one.

There are many reasons why Wolves are in League one and Ebanks-Blake is well down the list.

Oh ok. Well you wankers take him.

My team should be aiming higher, we want to win the league.

You daft lad.

Let's just remind ourselves where Bolton were in the league under your last manager. Yes that's right, Wolves have had two of them sorts this season.

It's going to be funny if Berra rolls up at the Reebok to work with his fellow Scotsman. then again at least you'll be getting a good defender.

WUM