wanderlust wrote:Megson spent a fortune on average signings thereby accelerating our financial decline so that Coyle and now Freedman had to rebuild an unsustainable and failing team with no budget. If Coyle had half the nett spend that Megson had he would have kept us up, but he was forced into letting decent players go in order to spend anything.
Didn't help himself by adopting a long-term strategy based on survival whilst the youth players came through as the stopgap players he brought in were crap and we didn't survive albeit narrowly.
Megson kept us up by throwing money at the problem. Coyle took us down by releasing expensive players and not replacing them. Both seemed to work at ideological extremes, but of the two I'd say Coyle was marginally better as with a bit of good luck and a lot less bad luck (especially with injuries to key players) we would have survived long enough to get back on an even keel.
Wanderlust, this idea that Mugson kept us up by throwing money at the problem is slightly flawed. Mugson spent £36m in his time at the club but he did sell Anelka for £15m, Diouf £3m, Nolan £4m, Faye £2m, Michalik £500k, Speed £250k and Meite £2m. Total net spend approx £9.5m over 2 and a bit seasons. Is that really throwing money at it?
Mugson was a far better manager than Coyle. I just don't think he was very likeable.