what is the point in zat knight?

Jamster26 wrote:It's amazing how poor Ream has looked in the Championship. He was quite decent in the Premier League, but he hasn't adjusted well to the Championship at all. Shame, because he's quick and he can read the game well.

Can't agree with you about "he can read the game well."

Hipster_Nebula wrote:Knight not only causes untold problems at the back. He's also a reason our attack is so poor.

any time he gets the ball he more often than not just pumps it out to touch or plays a terrible "long pass"

That can't be true otherwise our Manager would never pick him

waynagain wrote:

Hipster_Nebula wrote:Knight not only causes untold problems at the back. He's also a reason our attack is so poor.

any time he gets the ball he more often than not just pumps it out to touch or plays a terrible "long pass"

That can't be true otherwise our Manager would never pick him

You're right i was lying, he's brilliant.

Hipster_Nebula wrote:

waynagain wrote:

Hipster_Nebula wrote:Knight not only causes untold problems at the back. He's also a reason our attack is so poor.

any time he gets the ball he more often than not just pumps it out to touch or plays a terrible "long pass"

That can't be true otherwise our Manager would never pick him

You're right i was lying, he's brilliant.

Who, Freedman?

What is the point of Zat Knight? well for one he gives some of you something to moan about, Who will it be once he has been hounded out of the club?

The insane high back lob he did to Bogdan in the Burnley match said it all. Dawson sorted Knight out but now he's gone back to dog shit. For such a big defender he has no physical presence whatsoever. if he's not punting it out or up he's passing back and allowing strikers to have a field day.

Also, i'd rather see Ream at right back than Mears. Or could we get Nicky Hunt back on loan from Accrington?

On reading all this thread I don't think there is any point in Zat Knight.