Wigan 3-2 Bolton

I'm suggesting you are Duggy you slow cnut!

If you actually went to the match and came up from Birmingham and find solace in the fact we didn't get battered then I would give up going if I was in your position. You display less passion than the players!!

Where did I say I was satisfied with the result? You're obsessed with me and trying to twist my words SK, it's embarrassing. Instead of making failed attempts to get 1 up on me add me to your foes list if I get to you that much, get a grip.

Fighting back from 2 goals down is a positive, the final result is clearly not. We should have come away with at least a point and shouldn't have conceded some sloppy goals caused by shit defending. We dominated the game for a large period (between their second and third). The fightback should be expected but the fact is for much of this season we haven't managed to carry any sort of attacking threat, so 5 goals in 2 games is a positive for me (albeit a very minor one).

Nonsense being talked about Dougie when the game plan was OK and we'd have won but for player error, a harsh penalty (IMO) and missed chances.

How people keep defending the players just so they can have a go at the manager is beyond me.

At least Natasha is consistent (if boringly repetitive) - she slags off the players AND the manager.

Jury's out on Dougie for me, but if we'd defended properly and taken our chances we'd have won so if anyone is to blame for this one it's the players.

I agree with 1874

Piss poor.

The result was shite and for 70 minutes the players were also shite. How can freedman be blamed?

He can't change it as that was our best side.

Too negative boggers , we could never defend a Wigan onslaught like that for long, you can make all the excuses you want , if this happened if that happened, at the end of the day the table doesn't lie and the buck stops with Freedman.

We saw what happened when we eventually attacked, we still lost

Does anybody else read Boggers' comments in their head in Ron Burgundy's voice?

It adds a real sense of gravitas, in my opinion.

wanderlust wrote:Nonsense being talked about Dougie when the game plan was OK and we'd have won but for player error, a harsh penalty (IMO) and missed chances.

How people keep defending the players just so they can have a go at the manager is beyond me.

At least Natasha is consistent (if boringly repetitive) - she slags off the players AND the manager.

Jury's out on Dougie for me, but if we'd defended properly and taken our chances we'd have won so if anyone is to blame for this one it's the players.

No... we didn't start playing until two goals down....it took that much to wake us up. We probably would have lost 2-1

I like breadman

bwfc1874 wrote:Where did I say I was satisfied with the result? You're obsessed with me and trying to twist my words SK, it's embarrassing. Instead of making failed attempts to get 1 up on me add me to your foes list if I get to you that much, get a grip.

Fighting back from 2 goals down is a positive, the final result is clearly not. We should have come away with at least a point and shouldn't have conceded some sloppy goals caused by shit defending. We dominated the game for a large period (between their second and third). The fightback should be expected but the fact is for much of this season we haven't managed to carry any sort of attacking threat, so 5 goals in 2 games is a positive for me (albeit a very minor one).

Obsessed with you, don't flatter yourself!
A loss is a fucking loss, how can you draw a positive from that? They pulled it back to 2-2 then went on a usual walkabout. Your talking what you smoke, shit!!

Boggersbelief wrote:I like breadman

Me too.

Funnily enough he reminds me of a poster that used to be on Burnden Aces a couple of years ago called Archie, who had a picture of Ron Burgundy as his avatar!

Are you implying that I am Archie?

No.

Mr Breadman reminds me of Archie and he just happened to mention Ron Burgundy which was Archie's avatar.

Small world and all that.

Anyone else noticed that Freedmans subs are always reactive never proactive ?? He never changes personnel or tactics until the opposition manager has made changes ? It happens in every game !!

In football you always need to be proactive rather than reactive. This philosophy pretty much applies to all walks of life unless you a Fireman.

[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

Shows a few more of our chances in this video

My mistake sluffy