My Palace mate says something very similar although he also contextualises it by saying that Freedman did good work with a limited budget, especially in terms of sorting out the youth system and bringing players like Bolassie and Zaha through and dumping a lot of no-hopers.doffcocker wrote:Interesting post from a Crystal Palace fan who oddly went to the game.Palace fan wrote:Just got in from the game, fine day up London Bridge with a few beers but the Football itself was dire.
I said to so many Bolton around me it was like watching Palace from a few years ago under Freedman. He was so unbelievably negative it was painful viewing. Despite the early goal Bolton were shocking, couldn't keep the ball, couldn't even play it into the channels without it going to a Millwall full back or Dartford locals sitting in the Dockers stand. The Polish Forward looked lively for Bolton but again like two years ago with Murray in his first season he had no support whatsoever so he was limited in what he could do. They played so deep and gave Millwall so much time on the ball, I mean 39% possession against Millwall is embarrassing to say the least.
But in all credit to Holloway he has tried to get Millwall knocking the ball about, the holding midfielder they signed from MK Dons looks a good player, Williams. But all in all they just didn't have no real spark or quality to really hurt Bolton.
Today made me realize how much of a gap in quality there is between the championship and premier league. Two very poor teams who might be lucky there is teams even worse than them who will go down. If Charlton manage to win their games in hand though Millwall could be in deep trouble. The game between each other coming up at the den could be vital.
Something's however never change with Millwall's pond life support. The real Millwall support must be ashamed to see kids of 15 year old kids from Kent giving it the large. The word for them isn't even intimidating, more like cringeworthy.
A massive cry of Freedman out in the Bolton end as well, when Freedman came over to applaud the support all he got was boo's and abuse.
He totally understands why Freedman was appointed as he will eventually produce and play youth team products and manage on a shoestring.
That's all well and good, but he correctly predicted that Freedman will stick to a system that only works with better players than he has - which is unrealistic, inflexible and very frustrating for everyone involved.
System looked fine last season when we were solid at the back and Eagles and Lee looked a real threat, but sticking with it this year just looks naive. His prediction for us this year is that we'll just survive - and that's based on the premise that there are 4 teams worse than we are.