Ched Evans

gloswhite wrote:

you are leaving yourself wide open to bellends like Evans.

Was this intentional Nat ?

Of course it was.

karlypants wrote:Will the woman now be named and shamed and do a 2.5 year stint in the clink to make things right?

Idiotic comment. How would that 'make things right'?

Evans being found not guilty doesn't automatically prove this woman invented the story or her version of events. She could easily believe her story as strongly as Evans believes his.

bwfc1874 wrote:

karlypants wrote:Will the woman now be named and shamed and do a 2.5 year stint in the clink to make things right?

Idiotic comment. How would that 'make things right'?

Evans being found not guilty doesn't automatically prove this woman invented the story or her version of events. She could easily believe her story as strongly as Evans believes his.

How is it an idiotic comment?

He has lost 2 and a half years of his life being banged up plus he has been named and shamed and almost lost his career and pretty much the whole of the UK know him as a rapist.

The woman's name hasn't been mentioned once at all.

My comment was in generalisation as perhaps something should happen to her now?

It is all too easy for the woman to cry rape though and at the end of the day, she went to his hotel room  with him.

What did she expect? Tea, biscuits and a chat?

So whenever there is a bit guilty verdict in a rape case you're suggesting the victim should be punished?

Him being not guilty doesn't prove that she is guilty.

bwfc1874 wrote:

karlypants wrote:Will the woman now be named and shamed and do a 2.5 year stint in the clink to make things right?

Idiotic comment. How would that 'make things right'?

Evans being found not guilty doesn't automatically prove this woman invented the story or her version of events. She could easily believe her story as strongly as Evans believes his.

With you on this BWFC all this will do is make it even more difficult for genuine women to come forward. to say she was not named is untrue she had to move away due to trolls.  Not saying she is a girl of great virtue but any decent bloke would not take advantage of a girl incapable of giving consent

So for me he need to take a long look in the mirror, plus he cheated on his girlfriend so all in all hes still a piece of shit.

Signing for Sheffield United for £500k.

Chesterfield must think it's Christmas. He's been out of the team for two months and before that he'd gone 11 games without scoring.

wessy wrote:

So for me he need to take a long look in the mirror, plus he cheated on his girlfriend so all in all hes still a piece of shit.

This

okocha wrote:Spoiler alert!!:- Did you watch National Treasure, recently concluded on Channel 4, where the jury found the Robbie Coltrane celebrity character not guilty of rape, just as the viewers (and his wife played by Julie Walters) discovered that he was actually guilty?

The play's author clearly wanted to show how difficult it is for female victims and their barristers to secure a conviction against ruthless defence teams who shred witnesses to pieces in the witness box.

I watched it and I agree. Just because someone is found Not Guilty at court doesn't mean that they didn't do it. OJ Simpson is a prime example.