You'd Have To Be Dim To Vote Anything But Tory

Now I'm not taking sides or anything but throughout this thread I have seen Breadman taking uneccessary, unprovoked digs at Jake. (And a few at scott on other threads)

You always pull people up for doing that, Bman. Jake is regularly made out to be the problem but I'm not so sure

Oh behave yourself Boggers!

Boggersbelief wrote:Now I'm not taking sides or anything but throughout this thread I have seen Breadman taking uneccessary, unprovoked digs at Jake. (And a few at scott on other threads)

You always pull people up for doing that, Bman. Jake is regularly made out to be the problem but I'm not so sure

I post all day.

AD waits in the wings and snipes when most of the Nutters have gone to bed.

Unprovoked digs.....?

Go back and do some proper research, Boggers.

AD and his chum have been trying to provoke a response for a few weeks now but I've not bitten.

His chum appears to have realised that the game's finally up and has actually been quite pleasant, bordering on almost friendly today.

It's the way forward.

Honestly.

I agree about scott trying to rile you, I've noticed it. But from what I've seen jake has tried to keep himself to himself. Maybe I've missed the times he's tried to wind you up

My bad

Boggersbelief wrote:Now I'm not taking sides or anything but throughout this thread I have seen Breadman taking uneccessary, unprovoked digs at Jake. (And a few at scott on other threads)

You always pull people up for doing that, Bman. Jake is regularly made out to be the problem but I'm not so sure

At last someone can see through him,it's there for all to see every time it's him starting it but me that gets the bollocking from Sluffy, he calls me a dullard twice with no provocation from me, I retaliate and get threatened with a ban by sluffy. I have never instigated a spat with breadman its always him that starts it then just as he has now makes out its not him, he has been out to get me and scott banned from day one he joined then there's the pm's telling us he will get us banned eventually, but he's sluffy and KP's darling and continues to get away with it.

Boggersbelief wrote:I agree about scott trying to rile you, I've noticed it. But from what I've seen jake has tried to keep himself to himself. Maybe I've missed the times he's tried to wind you up

My bad

No you have not missed any because there are none bloggers .

Another lie as well ,I post more during the day, you just can't stop it can you breadman.

Jake wrote:He's sluffy and kps darling

Agree 100%. He is the golden child

Breadman wrote:

Boggersbelief wrote:Now I'm not taking sides or anything but throughout this thread I have seen Breadman taking uneccessary, unprovoked digs at Jake. (And a few at scott on other threads)

You always pull people up for doing that, Bman. Jake is regularly made out to be the problem but I'm not so sure

I post all day.

AD waits in the wings and snipes when most of the Nutters have gone to bed.

Unprovoked digs.....?

Go back and do some proper research, Boggers.

AD and his chum have been trying to provoke a response for a few weeks now but I've not bitten.

His chum appears to have realised that the game's finally up and has actually been quite pleasant, bordering on almost friendly today.

It's the way forward.

Honestly.

Boggers is right I have ignored your attempts at digging away at me until recently when I had enough and you are gleefully going for it now that sluffy has totally ignored what you do and has come out in favour of you, you are a very snidey conman bread.

We don't have 'darling's' on here - that's why you and Scott got banned at the same time Bread took a time out from here - we simply got on without you all.

Between the lot of you, you hurt the forum quite badly - and all though the forum isn't anything important in the scheme of things, a great many people have worked their bollocks off - for free - in their own time, to make this place what it is - and we don't want to get shat on again with all your personal agendas and point scorings.

The bottom line was whether you liked it or not, this forum survived with out you all and it was you that came back to us - not the other way around - and don't forget that!

Yes, it was inevitable that 'digs' would be made from all sides but theres simply no comparison being called a 'dullard' and your response! -

Jake McHale wrote:

Breadman wrote:

Jake McHale wrote:Show me which labour govt in their whole history left power leaving a good economy.

You can argue the same about the tories, you dullard.

That's why they get voted out...

Wrong you fat turd sucker they get voted out by shit eaters like you with their brains in their arses.

If you don't like the way we mod, or you think we have 'darlings' then don't bother with us.

Simple.

Otherwise grow up, the lot of you.

It's a fecking internet footy forum - not real life!

Nobody got anybody banned - you are all still here - so move on.

If you can't then just say and we'll delete your account/s for good.

Problem solved.

Thank you.

I say this to every one go back and check these spats and I gaurantee I never started one of them, but I do have a breaking point and when I go I don't hold back. I'm not letting him get away with it, he also gets other posters like Kp,SK RT etc having goes as well and most of all sluffy they all love him and stick together. I don't want him banned I just would like to have nothing to do with him but he would love to get me banned and scott ,what scott does is his affair but I can see how he has got Scott's back up if he has had the sort of threatening pm's I have had from him.

I think these pms should be aired then we can all see the real story

Sluffy wrote:We don't have 'darling's' on here - that's why you and Scott got banned at the same time Bread took a time out from here - we simply got on without you all.

Between the lot of you, you hurt the forum quite badly - and all though the forum isn't anything important in the scheme of things, a great many people have worked their bollocks off - for free - in their own time, to make this place what it is - and we don't want to get shat on again with all your personal agendas and point scorings.

The bottom line was whether you liked it or not, this forum survived with out you all and it was you that came back to us - not the other way around - and don't forget that!

Yes, it was inevitable that 'digs' would be made from all sides but theres simply no comparison being called a 'dullard' and your response! -

Jake McHale wrote:

Breadman wrote:

Jake McHale wrote:Show me which labour govt in their whole history left power leaving a good economy.

You can argue the same about the tories, you dullard.

That's why they get voted out...

Wrong you fat turd sucker they get voted out by shit eaters like you with their brains in their arses.

If you don't like the way we mod, or you think we have 'darlings' then don't bother with us.

Simple.

Otherwise grow up, the lot of you.

It's a fecking internet footy forum - not real life!

Nobody got anybody banned - you are all still here - so move on.

If you can't then just say and we'll delete your account/s for good.

Problem solved.

Thank you.

Here we go again,there is no call for him to call me a dullard but you come down on his side again, no bollocking for him is there sluffy only me.

You mean of course deleting scott and my accounts and not breads that right?

I call things as I see them I don't creep and I don't snide a nd I certainly don't try to get anyone banned breads poison has spread to others now so now I have KP and SK taking sides with bread and taking shots at me and you sluffy have made it quite clear you have a low tolerance level of me which just encourages bread and his chums to step up the snide remarks.

Boggersbelief wrote:I think these pms should be aired then we can all see the real story

We did that and he talked his way out of it, he is a tricky sort.

Jake McHale wrote:I say this to every one go back and check these spats and I gaurantee I never started one of them, but I do have a breaking point and when I go I don't hold back. I'm not letting him get away with it, he also gets other posters like Kp,SK RT etc having goes as well and most of all sluffy they all love him and stick together. I don't want him banned I just would like to have nothing to do with him but he would love to get me banned and scott ,what scott does is his affair but I can see how he has got Scott's back up if he has had the sort of threatening pm's I have had from him.

This is anything new - each and everyone of you KNOW about the sites 'ignore' function. It must be getting on to what, 18 months, 2 years ago when I first told you about it - so don't come with this bollocks that you can't avoid 'reacting' to his little digs.

What gets me is that you're grown men ffs!

Have a laugh by all means, wind each other up, pull each others plonkers - but stop taking this shit SO seriously that you start to have your own agendas on here.

As I've said we are honestly the best site around - most of the others apart from ww and tw are dead - check them out if you don't believe me - and we are constantly now even out posting tw - fact.

We simply aren't putting all our energy and a bit of actual money, to keep growing Nuts to watch some bitter old blokes who should know better, dump on each other - all over the site!

It pissed loads of people off last time - not just me - and we aren't going to go down that road again.

You used to be funny.

Not any more, not for a long while.

You're just bitter now with a clear agenda.

We might be soft but we aren't stupid.

Use the Foes list, or don't react, just turn the other cheek, be the better man, whatever - but if you want to be personal, vile and abusive - then there's only going to be one loser because we are absolutely sick and tired of this carrying on.

It's not healthy.

It's not funny.

It's pathetic.

I blame Ringo Starr, shyte drummer!!

I'm pretty sure I'm the site darling.

Boggersbelief wrote:Now I'm not taking sides or anything but throughout this thread I have seen Breadman taking uneccessary, unprovoked digs at Jake. (And a few at scott on other threads)

You always pull people up for doing that, Bman. Jake is regularly made out to be the problem but I'm not so sure

Hahahahahaha so good