Lard Lad wrote: Boggersbelief wrote:Lard Lad is spot on. If the clique don't like you, you'll be forced to reign yourself in or face a ban for fuck all.
For example, sluffy banned me when I took a break from the site, no reason was given
Spot on you dare not dissagree with the clique or return their abuse because you get banned for abuse and they dont.
The Angry Dad account is a fake said sluffy, NO its not i have been AD ever since i joined , yes i came back with another name and so far i'm still here and they know i'm AD but like you say boggers i'm playing safe because just one retaliation to some posters abuse and i'll be gone and he wont because i'm not part of the clique.
Anyway this is stupid i'm AD the lard lad name should go and the other brought back unless i'm going to get banned for saying what you already know. How many fake accounts does nat have a shed load but it suits the god's because......
Nobody has ever been banned for being a fake account - not by me at least - but you were banned (several times) for persistent and never ending personal
abuse.
I've given you chance after chance on here and up until this account you have just thrown it back in my face and continued your personal agenda and abuse.
The site has suffered over quite a spell of time recently because of people with their own agendas, one side persistently trying to wind up/abuse specific posters, the other side trying to get them banned - for good.
Even though this has clearly and undoubtedly hurt the site - a number of posters have left because of the never ending shit between the two sides - they have shown NO consideration for the rest of us and just continued their little games for their own self satisfaction and haven't given a shit about the rest of us.
This had to stop and a line has now been drawn to show that we are serious about this.
Rightly or wrongly Scott has gone and Boggers was given an enforced month holiday from Nuts with a CLEAR warning that he will be following Scott out the door for good if he came back and carried on where he left off.
I'm aware that there are two sides to this little vendetta that has been played out amongst yourselves over the last several months and only one side has seemingly been punished which I accept is unfair but that's the way the cookie crumbled. I would have done things differently if I was about - but I wasn't - and there's now nothing to be gained by going back and rectifying things - I did that the last time and it didn't work because you couldn't keep away from each other and other mods than I, with their finger on the ban button had no hesitation in hitting it - and did!
A forum needs diverse characters views and opinions to be interesting - it needs arguments and disagreements to have an edge to it but it certainly doesn't need never-fucking-ending ganging up on each other on every thread, every single bloody day to either wind someone up or alternatively to get someone banned.
You've got to know where the line is and know when to let things go and move on.
As a forum we are obviously only as good as our posts and posters.
I don't want Nuts to be squeaky clean because that is as boring as hell to me.
I also don't want Nuts to be a clique of posters who all think the same way and post the same things - how one dimensional is that?
We need humour to get along, instead we've had agendas.
Well we got what we deserved.
Up to us all now to move on and start afresh or we might as well pack it all in.
Home
)
