The Glazers haven't spent any of their own money but yes Man Utd will probably have spent the 3rd most money in the transfer market after Chelsea and Man City in the last say 15 years.
The Glazers bought Man Utd to make money for themselves which they have been very successful at.Chelsea and Man City have both had owners prepared to donate billions of pounds to buy footballers.
The issue for Sky is that Man Utd are far better supported than both Chelsea and Man City, success for the latter two doesn't sell the volume of subscriptons that a successful Man Utd does.
The novelty of Man Utd being shite will sell subscriptions to some haters for a while but they will get bored.Towards the end of his career a declining Muhammad Ali fought for the money but people lost interest in paying to watch him get twatted
The Glazers bought Man Utd to make money for themselves which they have been very successful at.Chelsea and Man City have both had owners prepared to donate billions of pounds to buy footballers.
The issue for Sky is that Man Utd are far better supported than both Chelsea and Man City, success for the latter two doesn't sell the volume of subscriptons that a successful Man Utd does.
The novelty of Man Utd being shite will sell subscriptions to some haters for a while but they will get bored.Towards the end of his career a declining Muhammad Ali fought for the money but people lost interest in paying to watch him get twatted