Norpig wrote: Sluffy wrote: Norpig wrote:i was on the chatbox and saw Lusty's comment, if people wanted the link then ask for it! Bit too much Lusty bashing on here at the moment in my opinion.
You're missing the point pig.
How does Karly, or anyone else, even know to ask for a link to something they didn't even knows existed at the time?
And when someone did suspect Wanderlust WAS watching a link and asked him - he didn't even bother to reply!
I know you are sticking up for Wanderlust but people aren't mind readers and be honest, how hard would it have been for him to mention there was a stream going at least an hour before he did eventually did so?
I'm sure you would have done it, I've certainly posted links to streams up several times in the past and Karly does it all the time!
My point is Sluffy,that you jump on anything Lusty says on any topic and automatically accuse of him making stuff up and of talking rubbish.
I get that you two have different opinions on a lot of things but this constant baiting of Lusty gets on my nerves.
It's not about opinions though - he like everybody else are entitled to hold those, it's more to do that he's factually incorrect more often than not.
Take the Chatbox where he told us Davies would have sat back and waited for a better offer if Holdsworth purchase of the club had fallen through.
That simply couldn't have happened as we were in court facing a petition from HMRC to shut us down, and which had been adjourned twice previously and the court had made it abundantly clear that it would not do again.
Davies had as a precaution for Holdsworth pulling out had already lodged papers to enter Administration - which would have been the default position if all else failed in the last minutes before entering into court.
It's not my opinion of things, it is what actually occurred.
I'm sorry if you don't agree with me correcting 'made up stuff' and replacing them with actual facts and figures wherever I can - and maybe I should now stop doing it and let the more easily led amongst us to be taken in by such 'fake news' if they want to be, perhaps?
Nuts may only be a small forum (it is though the second busiest of all BWFC forums in terms of daily posts made, behind only Wways) but in my way I've tried to keep threads within the realms of accuracy and reality were I could rather than allow them to go hurtling down the paths of pure fantasy and ludicrousness and at times even unwarranted animosity/hatred towards our clubs owner and/or manager - based on the rantings of one or two posters in particular.
Clearly I take it that you at least would rather I stopped this so I'll abstain from doing so for a period of time and see how things go.
I hope that this course of action will make you, and no doubt others, happy - although I would caution people to take some of the assertions made by certain folk with a huge pinch of salt during this time.
I trust that seems fair and reasonable to everyone?
Home
