Bolton Wanderers Football Club Fan Forum for all BWFC Supporters.

You are not connected. Please login or register

Bolton Nuts » BWFC » Wandering Minds » Royal baby

Royal baby

Go down  Message [Page 1 of 1]

1Royal baby Empty Royal baby on Wed May 08 2019, 15:30

rammywhite

rammywhite
Frank Worthington
Frank Worthington
Harry and his missus have got themselves a baby- seventh in line to the throne.
Does anyone give a monkeys about these minor royals?
Personally speaking, its a matter to me of complete indifference

2Royal baby Empty Re: Royal baby on Wed May 08 2019, 15:33

boltonbonce

boltonbonce
Nat Lofthouse
Nat Lofthouse
I saw the baby on TV today. It looks like a baby.
Not a Royalist, so not really bothered. Had it been smoking a pipe I'd have taken some interest.

3Royal baby Empty Re: Royal baby on Wed May 08 2019, 15:36

Hipster_Nebula

Hipster_Nebula
Nat Lofthouse
Nat Lofthouse
Normally I would but markle and Harry appear to be of the liberal variety.

4Royal baby Empty Re: Royal baby on Wed May 08 2019, 15:37

Angry Dad

Angry Dad
Youri Djorkaeff
Youri Djorkaeff
Well it's obviously the first baby to ever have been born going by the television today.

5Royal baby Empty Re: Royal baby on Wed May 08 2019, 15:40

karlypants

karlypants
Nat Lofthouse
Nat Lofthouse
It’s just another mouth to feed for the taxpayer

6Royal baby Empty Re: Royal baby on Wed May 08 2019, 15:42

rammywhite

rammywhite
Frank Worthington
Frank Worthington
@boltonbonce wrote:I saw the baby on TV today. It looks like a baby.
Not a Royalist, so not really bothered. Had it been smoking a pipe I'd have taken some interest.

Have you sent them any slippers for their sprog?

7Royal baby Empty Re: Royal baby on Wed May 08 2019, 16:10

boltonbonce

boltonbonce
Nat Lofthouse
Nat Lofthouse
@rammywhite wrote:
@boltonbonce wrote:I saw the baby on TV today. It looks like a baby.
Not a Royalist, so not really bothered. Had it been smoking a pipe I'd have taken some interest.

Have you sent them any slippers for their sprog?
The boy is far too young for slippers. My Dad gave my brother and I some 'travelling slippers'. That's what he called them anyway. They were soft, and you could roll them up.
I was ten, my brother five. Years later we discovered the bastard had given us ballet shoes!

8Royal baby Empty Re: Royal baby on Wed May 08 2019, 16:50

rammywhite

rammywhite
Frank Worthington
Frank Worthington
They've called the little bugger Archie.
That's a f*cking dogs name

9Royal baby Empty Re: Royal baby on Wed May 08 2019, 18:33

Angry Dad

Angry Dad
Youri Djorkaeff
Youri Djorkaeff
It's short for Archibald.

10Royal baby Empty Re: Royal baby on Wed May 08 2019, 21:48

rammywhite

rammywhite
Frank Worthington
Frank Worthington
@Angry Dad wrote:It's short for Archibald.
But they've called him Archie- not Archibald. He'll be an Arch Prince!

11Royal baby Empty Re: Royal baby on Thu May 09 2019, 01:50

Sluffy

Sluffy
Admin

12Royal baby Empty Re: Royal baby on Thu May 09 2019, 11:17

Hipster_Nebula

Hipster_Nebula
Nat Lofthouse
Nat Lofthouse
Are the mods able to look into the term "monkeys" used in the thread title.

Bit racist. Maybe a more inclusive welcoming term could be used #jc4pm

13Royal baby Empty Re: Royal baby on Thu May 09 2019, 11:19

Norpig

Norpig
Nat Lofthouse
Nat Lofthouse
I'm not biting

14Royal baby Empty Re: Royal baby on Thu May 09 2019, 12:42

karlypants

karlypants
Nat Lofthouse
Nat Lofthouse
@Hipster_Nebula wrote:Are the mods able to look into the term "monkeys" used in the thread title.

Bit racist. Maybe a more inclusive welcoming term could be used #jc4pm
:facepalm:

15Royal baby Empty Re: Royal baby on Thu May 09 2019, 13:22

Angry Dad

Angry Dad
Youri Djorkaeff
Youri Djorkaeff
@karlypants wrote:
@Hipster_Nebula wrote:Are the mods able to look into the term "monkeys" used in the thread title.

Bit racist. Maybe a more inclusive welcoming term could be used #jc4pm
:facepalm:
I think he means it KP Laughing

16Royal baby Empty Re: Royal baby on Thu May 09 2019, 20:24

rammywhite

rammywhite
Frank Worthington
Frank Worthington
@Hipster_Nebula wrote:Are the mods able to look into the term "monkeys" used in the thread title.

Bit racist. Maybe a more inclusive welcoming term could be used #jc4pm
Hello HP,
There was nothing racist intended in the title. I was using the expression 'couldn't give a monkeys' in the colloquial sense where the etymological meaning is derived from  'couldn't give a monkeys toss' or 'couldn't give a monkeys shit'. That's my understanding unless you know a different etymological derivation. I think you might be influenced by Danny Baker's idiotic picture released today- and nothing could be further from my mind than a reference like that. It certainly wasn't a racist reference. If it offended, then I apologise.
If the mods wan to change it to 'toss' or 'damn' then I'm more than happy to agree. 

Rammy

17Royal baby Empty Re: Royal baby on Thu May 09 2019, 21:14

sunlight

sunlight
Nicolas Anelka
Nicolas Anelka
Wept tears of joy as if it were my own child and sent a formal letter of congratulations that went straight in the palace shredder.

18Royal baby Empty Re: Royal baby on Thu May 09 2019, 21:20

boltonbonce

boltonbonce
Nat Lofthouse
Nat Lofthouse
@sunlight wrote:Wept tears of joy as if it were my own child and sent a formal letter of congratulations that went straight in the palace shredder.
I'm knitting the boy a hat.

19Royal baby Empty Re: Royal baby on Thu May 09 2019, 21:23

sunlight

sunlight
Nicolas Anelka
Nicolas Anelka
@boltonbonce wrote:
@sunlight wrote:Wept tears of joy as if it were my own child and sent a formal letter of congratulations that went straight in the palace shredder.
I'm knitting the boy a hat.
Laughing

Back to top  Message [Page 1 of 1]

Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum