OFFICIAL - Bolton up for sale for £25 million

Bassini for sure.

What a bunch of negative bellends.

Shameful.

Natasha Whittam wrote:What a bunch of negative bellends.

Shameful.

I’ve tried to always be positive in my 7 years as a nut member.

[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

So Sammy saying at it is, and let's see if Sluffy can make Anderson look good again after reading it.

MartinBWFC wrote:[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

So Sammy saying at it is, and let's see if Sluffy can make Anderson look good again after reading it.

Prepare yourself for a 20 paragraph response Martin 

MartinBWFC wrote:[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

So Sammy saying at it is, and let's see if Sluffy can make Anderson look good again after reading it.

Martin.

I have stated numerous times that the Burnden Aces site is no more than a copy and paste site who basically changes a few words about and reposts the original article.  This is done to attract simpletons to their site, to click on to the link, which in turn is recorded as 'traffic' to the site.

Companies that seek to place advertisements look for sites like this and pay the owner a sum of money so the people can see the ads, and some even click on them and even spend their money at the ad site.

The article you from which this particular 'story' was taken was from Marc Iles and wrote TWO DAYS AGO and posted upon Nuts at the time!!!!

[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

At least we have the decency to clearly quote the source of every article we publish (it is there in the BA article if you know where to look) and most certainly don't attempt to leach off someone else's hard work to prostitute ourselves to earn money.

If you really are so keen to break a story - and clearly you are - then I suggest you do what BA and to a large extent LoV do by simply clicking on to the NewsNow Bolton website and finding the original articles and post them up on here and ww - but if you do, please do the decent thing for the person who did the hard work in writing the article in the first place by posting a link to the original article at the end of your post.

[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

MartinBWFC wrote:[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

So Sammy saying at it is, and let's see if Sluffy can make Anderson look good again after reading it.

The interviews with the players since admin came in have been good reads in general, and sum up what most of us thought. The off field shenanigans by Anderson drove the club into the ground. Say what you want about the players, but as in any work place motivation is vital.

The lack of communication and in some instances outright lies from Ken killed us.

T.R.O.Y wrote:

MartinBWFC wrote:[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

So Sammy saying at it is, and let's see if Sluffy can make Anderson look good again after reading it.

The interviews with the players since admin came in have been good reads in general, and sum up what most of us thought. The off field shenanigans by Anderson drove the club into the ground. Say what you want about the players, but as in any work place motivation is vital.

The lack of communication and in some instances outright lies from Ken killed us.

At the end of the day it was lack of money that killed us.

Do you really think the players would be at all interested in anything the Chairman/club owner had to say as long as everything was being paid and all in their world was comfortable?

Eddie Davies was virtually an anonymous, silent owner, who seldom if ever communicated with the players.  As long as the bills were paid nobody had any issues whatsoever.

It was only when the well started to run dry and Allardyce wasn't given the millions to buy star players that even was he even thought about by anyone!

Throw enough money at a problem and it tends to go away.

When the money is no longer there is when the problems really start.

Sluffy wrote:At the end of the day it was lack of money that killed us.

Do you really think the players would be at all interested in anything the Chairman/club owner had to say as long as everything was being paid and all in their world was comfortable?

Eddie Davies was virtually an anonymous, silent owner, who seldom if ever communicated with the players.  As long as the bills were paid nobody had any issues whatsoever.

It was only when the well started to run dry and Allardyce wasn't given the millions to buy star players that even was he even thought about by anyone!

Throw enough money at a problem and it tends to go away.

When the money is no longer there is when the problems really start.

So Ken is blameless?

I think if the lack of funds had been communicated better morale would have been maintained better. Evidence from the players supports that. But you’re only interested in excusing Anderson as you have for 3 years.

Natasha Whittam wrote:

Sluffy wrote:At the end of the day it was lack of money that killed us.

Do you really think the players would be at all interested in anything the Chairman/club owner had to say as long as everything was being paid and all in their world was comfortable?

Eddie Davies was virtually an anonymous, silent owner, who seldom if ever communicated with the players.  As long as the bills were paid nobody had any issues whatsoever.

It was only when the well started to run dry and Allardyce wasn't given the millions to buy star players that even was he even thought about by anyone!

Throw enough money at a problem and it tends to go away.

When the money is no longer there is when the problems really start.

So Ken is blameless?

Depends on if he acted illegally bringing the company's to insolvency, or acting illegally whilst the club/company's were insolvent.

T.R.O.Y wrote:I think if the lack of funds had been communicated better morale would have been maintained better. Evidence from the players supports that. But you’re only interested in excusing Anderson as you have for 3 years.

Are you honestly trying to tell me the players were unaware of the lack of funds and needed to be told about that?

Not condemning Anderson without proof is not the same as 'excusing' him.

We both know that.

Anderson promised payments then failed to deliver multiple times. As he has with various other creditors. Why do you insist on everything being spelt out to you all the time?

T.R.O.Y wrote:Anderson promised payments then failed to deliver multiple times. As he has with various other creditors. Why do you insist on everything being spelt out to you all the time?

If you haven't got the money to pay the bills and you carry on trading - that is breaking the law and makes the Directors of the company PERSONALLY liable for the debt - which of course is KA.

If all the stories we are told are true then no doubt Anderson will be up in court sooner or later as the Administrator and his ten accountants have been going through the books with a fine toothcomb.

I'll await for the facts rather than believe the hearsay that as yet hasn't been proven.

Is that so radical of me?

So are you saying as long as someone doesn't break the law they are blameless?

So the players are lying and were never made commitments over when they wound receive payment?

Natasha Whittam wrote:So are you saying as long as someone doesn't break the law they are blameless?

In law yes.

Morally maybe not - but sadly we don't live in a perfect world.

Sluffy wrote:

Natasha Whittam wrote:So are you saying as long as someone doesn't break the law they are blameless?

In law yes.

Morally maybe not - but sadly we don't live in a perfect world.

Weird that, as you’ve spent half the season blaming the players for not putting up with Anderson’s shenanigans.

T.R.O.Y wrote:So the players are lying and were never made commitments over when they wound receive payment?

I never accused them of telling any lies did I?

No doubt Anderson said things that didn't happen, I say things sometimes that don't happen too.

Does that make me a serial liar or someone whose intentions have been overtaken by events or possibly said something based on incorrect information?

Who knows, I wasn't there, were you?

And isn't there always two sides to any disagreement - have you heard Anderson's explanation of all these specific events, because I've not.

Please share with us all if you have.

T.R.O.Y wrote:

Sluffy wrote:

Natasha Whittam wrote:So are you saying as long as someone doesn't break the law they are blameless?

In law yes.

Morally maybe not - but sadly we don't live in a perfect world.

Weird that, as you’ve spent half the season blaming the players for not putting up with Anderson’s shenanigans.

Have I?

Thought I'd spent half last season asking to hear what Ken's side of the story was first before wanting to join the lynch mob.