I've not understood what's been going on here so decided to try and find out because this thing isn't going away anytime soon and the more I can understand what's going on the better I feel (being one of those in the 'at risk' category).
In simple terms tests are being carried out and 'reported' but not in any meaningful way it seems - hence all this uncertainty about Leicester where the locals didn't seem to even know there was a problem?
The issue seems to stem from what exactly is reported from the testing.
In simple terms there are two major testing groups, those done by the hospitals (known as 'pillar 1' data) and those by commercial labs (pillar 2 data).
Both seem to be given added together at the daily national updates BUT only the pillar 1 details are given out to the public.
For instance if you click the link below you can see what the daily 'running' total is in your local area - for Leicester the area post code is LE2 -
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-51768274
Up to the 29th June it shows 1,056 confirmed cases.
However when the Tier 2 Lab tests are added - (and taken from the link to today's Daily Mail) -
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-8473769/The-36-areas-England-Covid-19-cases-RISING.html
"The massive disparity in figures is seen clearly in Leicester. Leicester City Council (LCC) claims there has been 3,216 laboratory-confirmed coronavirus cases across the city since Britain's outbreak began to spiral out of control in February".
It goes on to say -
"Local officials revealed 944 of those Covid-19 infections were diagnosed in the past fortnight — meaning the city's epidemic has grown by roughly 70.6 per cent since mid-June".
I assume therefore that the 3,216 total is therefore made up of 1,056 tier 1 positive tests, 1,216 tier 2 tests from Feb to mid June plus the 944 in the last two weeks - which I think is confimred in the tweet chart below.
To put it in to pictures which are easier to understand I've found this from a reporter from the FT -
What I can't understand is if the government had the details - and surely they must have had (they were talking about 11 days ago), why was nothing seemingly done much sooner?
Also begs the question why they are not adding tier 2 positive tests to the daily information they are already giving out on positive test reporting?
I know stats and figures can just about prove whatever you want but clearly somethings gone very awry here when a major city (350,000 population apparently) is seemingly completely unaware there is a major pandemic emergency growing quickly in its own community?
I guess rhetorically the question should also be asked, how did Leicester not know, surely they must have seen an increase in admissions to their local hospitals for instance?
Anybody with any views or thoughts on this?
Exactly the same things could happen/be happening were you live!
In simple terms tests are being carried out and 'reported' but not in any meaningful way it seems - hence all this uncertainty about Leicester where the locals didn't seem to even know there was a problem?
The issue seems to stem from what exactly is reported from the testing.
In simple terms there are two major testing groups, those done by the hospitals (known as 'pillar 1' data) and those by commercial labs (pillar 2 data).
Both seem to be given added together at the daily national updates BUT only the pillar 1 details are given out to the public.
For instance if you click the link below you can see what the daily 'running' total is in your local area - for Leicester the area post code is LE2 -
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-51768274
Up to the 29th June it shows 1,056 confirmed cases.
However when the Tier 2 Lab tests are added - (and taken from the link to today's Daily Mail) -
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-8473769/The-36-areas-England-Covid-19-cases-RISING.html
"The massive disparity in figures is seen clearly in Leicester. Leicester City Council (LCC) claims there has been 3,216 laboratory-confirmed coronavirus cases across the city since Britain's outbreak began to spiral out of control in February".
It goes on to say -
"Local officials revealed 944 of those Covid-19 infections were diagnosed in the past fortnight — meaning the city's epidemic has grown by roughly 70.6 per cent since mid-June".
I assume therefore that the 3,216 total is therefore made up of 1,056 tier 1 positive tests, 1,216 tier 2 tests from Feb to mid June plus the 944 in the last two weeks - which I think is confimred in the tweet chart below.
To put it in to pictures which are easier to understand I've found this from a reporter from the FT -
But the govt is sitting on a much more complete dataset including pillar 2, which tells a completely different story
— John Burn-Murdoch (@jburnmurdoch) June 30, 2020
More than 90% of new cases in Leicester are now under pillar 2, yet these numbers are not public. If you’re a local biz owner in Leicester, you only see the blue. pic.twitter.com/aZY20EuOGc
What I can't understand is if the government had the details - and surely they must have had (they were talking about 11 days ago), why was nothing seemingly done much sooner?
Also begs the question why they are not adding tier 2 positive tests to the daily information they are already giving out on positive test reporting?
I know stats and figures can just about prove whatever you want but clearly somethings gone very awry here when a major city (350,000 population apparently) is seemingly completely unaware there is a major pandemic emergency growing quickly in its own community?
I guess rhetorically the question should also be asked, how did Leicester not know, surely they must have seen an increase in admissions to their local hospitals for instance?
Anybody with any views or thoughts on this?
Exactly the same things could happen/be happening were you live!