Gays Win Compensation

Palace win compensation...

The owners of this guesthouse, who were ordered to pay damages for turning away a gay couple, have lost their UK Supreme Court fight.

I am fucking outraged. What is the world coming to when a man or woman can't decide who sleeps in their guesthouse?

If I was running a guesthouse I wouldn't want an unmarried couple in my bedrooms putting their bodily fluids all over the place.

I am seriously thinking of opening "Whittam Grove", a guesthouse that DOES NOT cater for unmarried couples, gays, lesbians, blacks, whites, men, women or dogs.

Twats.

Natasha Whittam wrote:

Hipster_Nebula wrote:

Obviously I'm against these bigots who run that hotel using their religion as a mask to preach and practice homophobia.

I don't see them as bigots, they had exactly the same rules for unmarried straight people. If anything they are being 100% honest and true to themselves - they should be applauded.

I think if they're worried about who is shagging who, then they shouldn't be running a B&B. The fact is they discriminated against people because they are gay. It's no better than the places that used to have a sign in the window saying 'No Blacks. No Irish'.

Dinae Moe Humm wrote:It's no better than the places that used to have a sign in the window saying 'No Blacks. No Irish'.

Not true.

They wouldn't let the gays share a room on religious grounds, not because they were homophobes. As the guy pointed out, he once stood behind a homo in the till queue at Morrisons.

Religion should always trump the law.

All religions are complete bollocks. I don't give any of them a second thought.

As the guy pointed out, he once stood behind a homo in the till queue at Morrisons.

He's not the only one.

Reebok Trotter wrote:As the guy pointed out, he once stood behind a homo in the till queue at Morrisons.

He's not the only one.

Was it your boyfriend RT?