Should we be fighting in Syria?

bwfc1874 wrote:Basically, Nat can't come up with a reasoned response to the arguments against trident.

wanderlust wrote:
How is preferring British construction and British site management with British security forces guarding the biggest British security threats anti-UK? 
You are an idiot who can't see how much this Government is undermining our national security.
I don't want the greatest nation in the world reduced to rubble because of the actions of our weak and stupid government. Or do you support the idea of the Chinese controlling our nuclear power stations?

Or do you just swallow the newspaper propaganda hook, line and sinker like the gullible twat you are?

Natasha Whittam wrote:

wanderlust wrote:
How is preferring British construction and British site management with British security forces guarding the biggest British security threats anti-UK? 
You are an idiot who can't see how much this Government is undermining our national security.
I don't want the greatest nation in the world reduced to rubble because of the actions of our weak and stupid government. Or do you support the idea of the Chinese controlling our nuclear power stations?

Or do you just swallow the newspaper propaganda hook, line and sinker like the gullible twat you are?

Wanderlust, you're just some twat from deepest darkest Norfolk who thinks he knows it all. I have no problem with any opinion you have, but it's the way you present them - like you're the only one who knows anything.

This government is far from perfect, but many of the problems it inherited from the last Labour lot.

If Labour were running things we'd probably all be dead already. Jeremy would be inviting terrorists into the UK.

bwfc1874 wrote:

The question of trident is nothing to do with party politics. I can't believe that you've read through all the posts on here and that bollocks is the best you could come up with, have you got any actual points or what?

Natasha Whittam wrote:Wanderlust, you are a fucking scumbag. Sick and tired of your anti-UK bullshit.

We are the greatest nation in the world, if you don't like it fuck off elsewhere.

Natasha Whittam wrote:

bwfc1874 wrote:

The question of trident is nothing to do with party politics. I can't believe that you've read through all the posts on here and that bollocks is the best you could come up with, have you got any actual points or what?

I made my point earlier in the thread: blow these twats to oblivion.

Mr Magoo wrote:

Natasha Whittam wrote:

bwfc1874 wrote:

The question of trident is nothing to do with party politics. I can't believe that you've read through all the posts on here and that bollocks is the best you could come up with, have you got any actual points or what?

I made my point earlier in the thread: blow these twats to oblivion.

Disgusting language from a lady, you should know better after your tw"t was set on fire once.

Reebok Trotter wrote: ISIS is a bug and bugs must be squished.

wanderlust wrote:
Agreed RT. I just don't think the nuke is the most appropriate weapon for the job.

Hipster_Nebula wrote:Tactical nuke incoming.

Breadman wrote:Scott?

Boggers, surely.....?

I appreciate that it's an easy mistake to make though.